Grayman
Soul Shade
Re: Thread derail by whom?
If I, whom, put a horse inside thou, how efficient would thouest horse mincing be, Mr mincer of words. Neh, the horse doth protest!
For we know not that the phenomenon exist in the current discussion, tis silly it tis, to argue thus. To do so is tis to risk out of topic of what hath actually occurred thus.
Tis, and I in whom shows such magnificence is one of such preferable abomination. It is thus that one such as thou can see thy true intelligence as great is it resides in whom but I...thus!
What sort of mincer are we talking about here? I do own a mincer. I also mince about when I walk. I sorta mince when I talk as well, but in a pretty blunt way so I don't think it counts.
And about generalizing.. yeah tis a dangerous thing but come on if Thurlor just so happened to show a symptom of a phenomenon without himself partaking in said phenomenon, then I should think that it be more sensible to focus on said phenomenon rather than he who erroneously deemed the agent of the symptom one of the phenomenon.
T'was a small misstake after all, and let's not forget those who would if in place in the accused have been found guilty on both charges. For they do exist, and they are an abomination after all.
All in all, ya'll.
If I, whom, put a horse inside thou, how efficient would thouest horse mincing be, Mr mincer of words. Neh, the horse doth protest!
For we know not that the phenomenon exist in the current discussion, tis silly it tis, to argue thus. To do so is tis to risk out of topic of what hath actually occurred thus.
Tis, and I in whom shows such magnificence is one of such preferable abomination. It is thus that one such as thou can see thy true intelligence as great is it resides in whom but I...thus!