Jordan~
Prolific Member
Existential crisis can develop into dysthymia and depression. Intelligent people are more likely to go through an existential crisis. So in that respect I suppose the intelligent have a vulnerability to depression; whether or not it's a significant enough vulnerability to make them more prone than everyone else, I'm not sure.
I didn't think myself into depression, but I think I did think myself into the mental state that made me vulnerable to depression - I'd philosophically eroded reality to the point that nothing seemed tangibly real and I felt that there was no point in doing anything, it was all meaningless, and life was just what you were forced to do while you were waiting to die.
Then along came something in which I could have unquestioning faith, unburdened by the uncomfortable revelations of reason, that gave my life meaning and purpose and made me feel that there was a point to it all. When it was withdrawn, the reason was gone, too, and I had nothing - hence depression.
As has been said, intelligence can mean a lot of different things, though. Honestly, I think it's more likely to be the case that people who are prone to depression are more likely to be intelligent, but the two aren't related. Many of the types most often described as 'smart' also have difficulty with emotion - either because they don't know how to handle it or they're extremely sensitive to it.
If you go with the idea that mental illness forms to escape a double bind - an inescapable situation in which no course of action is acceptable - by creating a state of mind in which absurdities are conceivable, conflicting positions can be held simultaneously, the ultimate escape seems desirable, etc., then you can imagine that introverts, rather than the intelligent, who are more likely to notice (or invent) a double bind during their introspection, are more prone to depression.
Here's a thought: 'Intelligence' usually means a particular mental 'gift', doesn't it? To have such a 'gift' one must have one function, in Myers-Briggs terms, on which one focuses intensely at the expense of the others. When that function isn't capable of dealing with something it leaves one crippled, with only the disproportionately less used and underdeveloped functions to depend on. For example, a very Ti-focused INTP experiencing an intense emotion that can't be rationalised, incapable of retreating from it into logic, has to resort to their scorned feeling function to deal with it, and being incapable of adequately processing it may become depressed.
I didn't think myself into depression, but I think I did think myself into the mental state that made me vulnerable to depression - I'd philosophically eroded reality to the point that nothing seemed tangibly real and I felt that there was no point in doing anything, it was all meaningless, and life was just what you were forced to do while you were waiting to die.
Then along came something in which I could have unquestioning faith, unburdened by the uncomfortable revelations of reason, that gave my life meaning and purpose and made me feel that there was a point to it all. When it was withdrawn, the reason was gone, too, and I had nothing - hence depression.
As has been said, intelligence can mean a lot of different things, though. Honestly, I think it's more likely to be the case that people who are prone to depression are more likely to be intelligent, but the two aren't related. Many of the types most often described as 'smart' also have difficulty with emotion - either because they don't know how to handle it or they're extremely sensitive to it.
If you go with the idea that mental illness forms to escape a double bind - an inescapable situation in which no course of action is acceptable - by creating a state of mind in which absurdities are conceivable, conflicting positions can be held simultaneously, the ultimate escape seems desirable, etc., then you can imagine that introverts, rather than the intelligent, who are more likely to notice (or invent) a double bind during their introspection, are more prone to depression.
Here's a thought: 'Intelligence' usually means a particular mental 'gift', doesn't it? To have such a 'gift' one must have one function, in Myers-Briggs terms, on which one focuses intensely at the expense of the others. When that function isn't capable of dealing with something it leaves one crippled, with only the disproportionately less used and underdeveloped functions to depend on. For example, a very Ti-focused INTP experiencing an intense emotion that can't be rationalised, incapable of retreating from it into logic, has to resort to their scorned feeling function to deal with it, and being incapable of adequately processing it may become depressed.