Search results

Internet Marketing

Scarface - The Diary

Yeah I agree with bold part. Being spontaneous and direct is something a lot of entrepreneurs are. I find myself second guessing decisions based on my "functional interplay."

I would say INFP. Dude was brilliant and very abstract minded. He was passionate about mathematics and applying philosophical ideals in the defense of science. He also had a life long struggle with religion and theology. Both are part of Fi-Te dynamics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvgN5gCuLac

I see what your saying. I know isfjs pretty well and your right about them needing to feel needed. Maybe my list is not fair but basically I was saying since isfjs have si/Fe they have less of a problem assimilating and accepting social norms. Even though they might want to be more like entps...

lol hardest of the SJs I would say. Even though they are the most understanding, they can always fall back on traditions and rules if needed.

I would rank in order of most difficult to be, especially when younger: INFP INTP ISFP ISTP INFJ ENTP INTJ ESTP ENFJ ENFP ENTJ ESFP ISFJ ESFJ ISTJ ESTJ *Notice how I think being ESTJ is the easiest and their "opposite" is the INFP which has the most trouble. *In general IPs have it hardest...

Make a blog, website and start writing. Show prospective employers your skills, there's lots of need for content writers, technical writers.

So Se is more narrow in a sense than Ne when taking in more information. It is more concerned with the immediate possibilities. While in another sense Se could be more encompassing of the "relevant" details due to this. Dom/aux Ne users can be said to seem aloof or pulling random connections...

Allied or Soviet?

I generally agree with this. Is this a feature of Ti or Se though? If I am focused on certain subject, I can get annoyed if someone tries to deviate or change the conversation. I am capable of doing it, but I find this can be distracting as I want to analyze thoroughly first. Economics...

How would you describe this difference between Ti-Se and Ti-Ne? I also enjoy taking apart systems in the "real" world mainly social sciences, economics in particular.

Command & Conquer

Nihilism is based on contractions in itself.

Paul Krugman

Originally thought ISTP. "Post-Snowden world"

Pilot(aircraft) - xSTP President - ExTJ

Feminism(and its influence direct or indirect) in general has been huge in the last 50+ years or so. Men are irreplaceable, prone to violence while woman are special and need to be considered so. Look at recent Hollywood movies for evidence.

http://insightsintoamodernworld.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/apps-what-web-30-looks-like.html

Just to get a student to as much as debt as possible? Yes

We use language systems to communicate with each other.

I wonder if this seems more realistic.

According to Wikipedia: From this definition it seems as this study is based on empirical evidence or experimentation. The epistemology or defining the actual knowledge of what actually is the mind is pure philosophy though. Certain philosophers have dealt with the mind-body problem and have...

http://www.seasteading.org/

Humans/Society

Ne heavy INTPs might possibly be more of the Sexual/Social or Social/Sexual instinctual variant and also more of 5w6 than 5w4. See this for more information: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/content.php/133-Instinctual-Stackings

Superior Intellect & Rational

What is a key difference between 5w4 and 5w6? I am for sure a 5, but go back and forth between the wings. I have a feeling 5w6 are more concerned with "social" issues rather than natural or mathematical problems unlike the 5w4.

Hilarious picture.

Good for times when you can't read like driving a car or boat.

Who makes up this government? Government(and their workers) are funded by private persons. Your comparing a private system - Land lords and renters, with citizens and the State. One is done voluntarily, other is done through coercion.

Rothbard on the fiction of the State:

ENTPs.... I am quite familiar with their approach

Whose house is it?

What is? LOL, Me too!

If I do not want to be forced to pay taxes, then I am ultimately forced to leave. Taxation is force, it is theft. Yes and that is what the State does. Go try to in the private sector, see how it turns out. Not sure what I meant but property rights specifically individual "ownership" is...

Maybe.

I am forced If an entity such as the State claims to protect property rights of individuals by expropriation(taxation, eminent domain) they are going against what they are claiming to do(protect property). Why cant all contracts be social contracts? Can only governments be capable of that?

Exactly so you are engaging in argumentation. What is the point of discourse if you are not trying to assert a statement? To just say things for no reason, or to just project sounds or type commands in a keyboard? Argumentation ethics presupposes you have control over your own body.

There is none. "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else" - Frederic Bastiat What if the law is not legitimate? How can an expropriator be a property protector?

No it is not metaphysics, that's always the biggest scapegoat when discussing philosophy. By you denying property rights your enter into a perfomative contradiction as your presupposing the right to assert your own belief using your own body(vocal cords, brain) to try to justify that property...

They also have the ability to create their own laws in accordance to their property rights. Yes which is why it is dangerous. You keep ignoring the legitimacy of the State. I already gave an example of how implicitly agreeing to the rules only applies if there exists a legitimate...

The state is made up of people, but that doesn't mean everyone is part of it. If you are part of the government you have different privileges than non-members. So you can say by voting we are part of the government but since it's a 'public' form of government, minority opinion is excluded which...

Kind of. This argument implies the State has prior claim to the land in the country. Taxpayers are technically the owners of the land. There might be other reasons why I might want to stay in a geographical region that is not necessarily related to it's laws as well. Also, I am still obligated...

Social contract is an illusion and can't be justified because if an individual does not agree to enter into it, he will be forced by the State. A contract requires voluntary agreement with the parties at hand without coercion. If this is done through force, it is not a legitimate contract...

Theory: I never agreed to the terms, simple as that. Practice: Article 1 Section 8 is violated constantly - One example: How are these taxes uniform?

The Constitution doesn't have any legal standing as well, in theory and in practice.

Equality has no unified meaning, so as an idea it is understood as a social justice issue not as a principle. In this case equality is a revolt against nature, as it goes against property rights. Property rights are inherit or natural and imply inequality.

Can't be free if there is scarcity of materials and goods.