Search results

smh my head i just facepalmed my way through this entire thread

i was invited to a meeting for one of these once, and they took me to a nice hotel where i ordered the most expensive things on the menu since it was on them halfway through the cobference i stood up and started telling the 'success story' on the stage that it was an obvious scam and berated...

0.042% the moon is 238, 900mi / 384, 400km away on average, so a difference of 100mi/161km is less than 1% it takes about 150million years for the distance to change 1% of this current amount at its current rate, but it's important to note that it moved away from earth faster when it first...

though i used the term 'spacedust', it covers all debris, meteorites etc. - so no change the late heavy bombardment was as you say, about 4 billion years ago and ended approx. 3.8 billion years ago - after which accumulation of debris would be limited, and would continue to become more and more...

Considering that the Earth's gravity is greater than the moon, and it therefore attracts more spacedust than the moon does - and that the amount of weight gained by earth is about 40,000 tonnes per year, or equivalent to 0.0000000000000000001% of mass per year (er, it's meant to be 19 0's but I...

do you have a source for the moon being smaller in the past? can you demonstrate how the size of the moon would shift? do you have any factors other than an apparent size similarity that demonstrate significance?

can you provide a source for circadian rhythms being tied to the moon? and when you say 'tied to the moon', are you saying that the moon is the only factor, the main factor, or one of several factors affecting circadian rhythm?

yeh no infjs allowed @higs ur banned

the moon's distance from Earth isn't static and neither is the distance from the sun. their apparent 'same size' varies is never actually the same the moon's apparent size would have once been much larger than the sun, and in the future it will be much smaller. not sure why significance needs...

seems like you have to ignore all the examples of times where things don't line up into threes to paint this as poetic. you can do things like this with almost any number and these ideas nearly always seem like the result of confirmation bias more-so than any meaningful concept if you're...

when i said its not bannable i did say as long as it doesn't "escalate to a certain point" bringing up that you are admittedly not neurotypical and that the way you view things and process the world is likely something that makes what you're saying here not something with universality, albeit...

both are aspects of me, but i think online is much more limited being confined to text in any interaction is frustrating and i tend to just get bored and not bother putting nearly as much effort into what i say as i should, so i come across as a lot more dismissive than i actually am in real...

that lady who orders a 1/8 strength extra hot almond cappucino with extra froth and just a little bit of chocolate who says, "im a barista"

@lightfire @Emmanuele @CatGoddess you shouldn't be getting marked as spam anymore, let me know if you do.

*turns to face cog, arms bent at approximately 20 degree angle with palms facing towards him*

okay but it won't make your idea any less ridiculous

not an attack if it's true, or maybe it's just a true attack either way, it's a valid point in the same way as saying the catholic church are paedophile enablers. it's an attack to most people, but that doesn't make it any less true or pertinent to say

wats a goon to a goblin

this idea is doubleplusgood and those who duckspeak against it are guilty of crimethink. failure to adhere to these ideals demonstrates a doubleplusungood association with ownlife.

also remove adjectives and have people use only the words "good" and "ungood" if something is exceedingly good or bad, they can say "doubleplusgood" or "doubleplusungood"

https://www.intpforum.com/threads/faq-why-are-my-messages-being-marked-as-spam.27607/ will fix for you now, sorry :(

With the migration of the forum platform to XenForo over the old and defunct VBulletin, there's an in-built spam filter that will often flag messages from new users as spam. Unfortunately we get quite a few spam-bots wanting to spam advertisements which often contain links to weird parts of the...

i think society sux

i used to i do it less now, but instead i've just come to realise there's benefits to being different or having different perspectives. as long as you're meeting objective measures, the things in between shouldn't really matter that much. so i just strive to be good at whatever i'm doing, then...

banned

2020

organic is orgasmic also this kind of interpretation of what constitutes a flaw and what the video author meant belong in the bin

yeah but the point is that he's wrong there's nothing stopping white billionaire businessmen from being accepted and even popular superheroes because it matters more that the superhero is just good. and yeah, rageclick channels are bad when the 'rage' they're peddling is wrong at best and...

my avatar is a picture of me

must be this year's new trendy

wow i love this forum sometimes

there's two options: 1. she isn't interested - leave it alone. if she becomes interested and lets you know, great. if not, leave it. 2. she's playing hard to get. people that do this are annoying and you shouldn't enable them. the best thing to do is again, leave it alone

people with watermelons for heads

"im not paranoid i just believe in synchronous events with mystical significance" wow so true imo

1. furries are the future 2. agreed 3. mostly agreed also people who are demonstrably incompetent in multiple ways, i'm unlikely to have much faith that they're competent in another way. most people probably have some strengths and weaknesses and i'm forgiving of outliers, but if incompetence...

it's not that it's a juvenile teleology, just that your conception of it is

wow so true imo i believed i was the authority, and now i really am if you can believe, you can achieve

wow so high iq imo if you act like a dickhead, people treat you like a dickhead law of attraction just can't stop winning

at least you're aware of your problem, that's the first step to becoming a better person i believe you can do it

wow do ur homework or ill ban u imo

i wished for breakfast cereal i took actions to obtain breakfast cereal i got breakfast cereal law of attraction: 1 science: 0

your post is now surrounded by my posts it worked! law of attraction confirmed

wow stop wishing for me to post a lot in this thread

i didn't actually i guess i just didn't wish hard enough

so i'm imagining this thing in my mind's eye, where i make a post on a forum now i take action by typing words into the box and when i press the post reply button, this happens checkmate scientists

if you think of stuff, and then you do that stuff, that stuff happens wow so complex imo.. science low iq concept for smoothbrain normies, law of attraction for galaxy brain high iq people with dense cortical folds

so just to be clear, you're asking me why i 'assume' that a system of producing replicable results across numerous contexts produces more reliable information than the law of attraction?