=o
I think I am INFp and you are INFp and there really is a j/p switch except there wouldn't be if MBTI hadn't screwed everything up.
I assume that you, like I often do, have interpreted EII and delta quadra to fit how you see yourself, and defined the other stuff as how you're not, when really you are an INFp.
Ni-Fe is what it meant in MBTI still, just has IJ said. However, I still feel that the approach we were using has some kind of validity, but it makes everything more complicated (like I have been saying - it implies a second function model, a second quadra grouping, a dichotomy that can divide the population into two, 16 different IEs, etc.
That's why we seem P-like despite being Js. We actually are perceiver types, because we are dominant perceivers. We are Ps. "INTP" in the sense of Jim Parsons/Sheldon are actually Js.
=o
That means the true custodians of this forum are what we had thought of as INTJ, who are actually INTp. This should be a Nai'Zyy forum, not Zai'Nyy.