• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

The "official" troll thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Coolydudey

You could say that.
Local time
Today 6:20 AM
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
1,039
---
Location
Pensive-land.....
On here, feel free to go off on any amount of tangents about trolls and trolling, but preferably mostly related to this forum.

I was thinking, you can have good trolls and bad trolls. Wtf? Well, while someone can be a troll, if they only keep it up for a brief amount of time, causing you to re-examine some assumptions (which can be useful), and/or say something funny (not your average troll), then they can actually be considered as an asset to the discussion, in small quantities. So for example, I consider DeadOnDreaming to be an ok (towards good) troll.

I was also thinking, all INTPs (in the slightly stereotypical sense) must have something of a troll inside them, given their nature.

I definitely LOVE annoying people in a troll-like sense, but trolling online provides nothing like the satisfaction of seeing people's faces and reactions, so I have not so far even tried. I'm sure I'll grow out of it soon. :evil:
 
Local time
Today 3:20 AM
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
705
---
I don't try to annoy people, I simply try to see the results of posting something that I predict will get an unintended result. Its like a science experiment, throwing a stone into a pond to see the ripples. If we were completely enlightened beings, this would be thought little more than writing a scandalous, though legitimate, article is, though people emotionally lash out much more than they think they do. Even those that think they're being completely logical, lets remember there are three layers to every person's brain, and even the pursuit of knowledge isn't as pure as people would like to believe.

Last night was a good example of this. On Facebook, everyone was up in arms about their proposition not going the way they wanted (even if every other proposition they voted for went how they wished). I was surprised to see rational people, especially those who went on and on about peace and love, the brotherhood of mankind, vehemently lashing out at the "idiots" who voted against their stance. Even to just post legitimate arguments against their proposition was an invitation to be lashed out at. Where happened to the docile creatures that only weeks ago were posting pictures of Jerry Garcia, talking about taking it easy (I live in California, where long hair bearded creature inhabit many towns and forests, smelling of skunks and unwashed bodies. I have nothing against long hair and beards, but it seems those two things cause a shift of personality to that of a nature-worshiping zealot)

I enjoy quoting nazis to hippies, and watching as they embrace the quote wholeheartedly, unaware of who uttered it.

"It is an assumption brought forth countless of times in various contexts that the world would be better, drifting slower towards the ruin, if women had the "power"; if political leadership, decision making, government and economic life was in the hands of women. I think reality, the observation material, supports the assumption." Linkola

"When man tries to rebel against the iron logic of Nature, he comes into conflict with principles to which he himself owes his existence as man. And so his action against Nature must lead to his own downfall." (Adolf Hitler)

I believe this illustrates a link between national socialist thought, and the general views of hippies in general. More study is needed in a controlled environment, though I think the book "The True Believer" by Eric Hoffer made a good argument about the link between them that may be as close as we get to such a thing (philosophy is not science, so the closeness is not as close as we like, yes?) I like to think I'm getting new knowledge in a novel way.
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Yesterday 4:20 PM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,393
---
Lol, to be clear I don't think trolling is the same as troll-like behaviour, persistant and unconstructive goading is what I consider actual trolling, whereas upsetting people as a means to an end (such as in the example above of quoting Nazies to Hippies) is troll-like but not actually trolling because upsetting them wasn't the end in of itself, as enjoyable as it may have been.

I suppose that's what I take issue with, when someone is "merely trolling", whereas I can appreciate it when someone is using trolling tactics as a constructive form of debate, indeed I do it myself, as some of you may well know :p
 
Local time
Today 3:20 AM
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
705
---
Cultivating unpleasant mental states in other people is like the heat of a gun being fired; an unwanted but necessary side effect, that if it becomes too great makes it impossible to operate any longer.
 

NinjaSurfer

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
730
---
^how come Cognisant is not banned for admitting to troll this forum-- when fukyo made it clear that a self admission to trolling is worthy of a perma ban?

^thats a rhetorical question which I'll answer

It's because "troll" and "trolling" have merely become synonymous with "annoying to a moderator" and an overused label which nobody (including Wikipedia) can really define

Trolling fits into the porn category-- I know it when I see it.

However, no two definitions are alike nor will any single definition capture trolling's full capacity

By most definitions, everyone is a troll. This is because the root intent of any one's action is attention-seeking behavior. Find one post that does not seek attention and you'll find the only non-troll on the internet.

In a forum full of "openminded" personalities, I expect that most "trolls" will be accommodated;

What else is a troll if not just a misunderstood character within society, outcast, attempting to emotionally connect with others, albeit in a rare fashion? And when their form of communication encroaches upon your boundaries of acceptability, setting off your annoyance alarms, the troll bell rings strong and the ban hammer falls hard.
 
Local time
Today 3:20 AM
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
705
---
Yes. I admitted to trolling before, as Cog just admitted right now. This was the primary reason that I considered Cat's banning a joke, the secondary being that she really was a virgin who had strong views against sex. It wasn't an act, though she found it funny that other people were offended by it, along with her using it to manipulate men that found her attractive. She played "The Virgin Queen", as Elizabeth I did, using her non-committal status to get what she desired.
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Yesterday 4:20 PM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,393
---
Didn't she brag about being a troll?

That's different, irl I'm as patient as a stone, unless someone's trying to annoy me, the difference being that I take offence to their intent and feel that I absolutely mustn't tolerate such behaviour as a matter of principle. Likewise I believe she was banned as a matter of principle, it's one thing to be troll-like, quite another to troll for it's own sake, and several magnitudes worse to troll and brag about it elsewhere.

Her abstinence has no relevance whatsoever, and believe me if the mods were banning people based upon beliefs/personalities they would have far bigger fish to fry.
 

NinjaSurfer

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
730
---
Lol bragging is ban-able?

All people here do is brag about themselves

I don't see how her (Cat's) behavior is unique
 

NinjaSurfer

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
730
---
Cognisant-- you seem to be an introverted feeler with these deeply held beliefs and values based out of thin air. You semantically confuse yourself, evaluating the nuances between "trolling" and "troll-like" behavior.

Slut vs slut-like behavior. It's all the same
 

pernoctator

a bearded robocop
Local time
Today 12:20 AM
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
444
---
Cognisant-- you seem to be an introverted feeler with these deeply held beliefs and values based out of thin air. You semantically confuse yourself, evaluating the nuances between "trolling" and "troll-like" behavior.

Slut vs slut-like behavior. It's all the same

I didn't find it confusing. Cognisant was saying it's the intent that makes the difference.
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Yesterday 4:20 PM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,393
---
Cognisant-- you seem to be an introverted feeler with these deeply held beliefs and values based out of thin air.
Lol, no I'm an existentialist, try finding me beliefs/values that aren't baseless :twisteddevil:

You semantically confuse yourself, evaluating the nuances between "trolling" and "troll-like" behavior.

Slut vs slut-like behavior. It's all the same
A semantic argument, about semantics... Was that a joke?
 

NinjaSurfer

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
730
---
I didn't find it confusing. Cognisant was saying it's the intent that makes the difference.

Good thing we've got psychics monitoring each of our deepest intents and motivations
 

NinjaSurfer

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
730
---
Lol, no I'm an existentialist, try finding me beliefs/values that aren't baseless :twisteddevil:


A semantic argument, about semantics... Was that a joke?


I'll be more specific
There is no difference between your behavior and catatonic's
Or mine for that matter
We are expressing opinions and evoking emotions

I don't quite understand people getting worked up over one's intent when the forum is full of objective thinkers

Like oh Mai gosh she intended to troll now this changes everything

How bout let's save intent for the courtrooms and deciding the difference between manslaughter and 1st degree murder?
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Yesterday 4:20 PM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,393
---
Where's the fun in that? :confused:

Y'know if she didn't get banned we couldn't have had this conversation.
 

NinjaSurfer

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
730
---
Where's the fun in that? :confused:

Y'know if she didn't get banned we couldn't have had this conversation.

Although I share your lighthearted attitude;
It's still kind of fucked up when someone gets banned for retarded reasons

"she said she was a troll, therefore she is, therefore deserves a ban"

^that was the "logic" used

Retarded.
 

pernoctator

a bearded robocop
Local time
Today 12:20 AM
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
444
---
I don't quite understand people getting worked up over one's intent when the forum is full of objective thinkers

Like oh Mai gosh she intended to troll now this changes everything

How bout let's save intent for the courtrooms and deciding the difference between manslaughter and 1st degree murder?

Wait a minute... so what if the courtroom is full of objective thinkers? Does intent matter or doesn't it? The principle should always be the same.
 

NinjaSurfer

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
730
---
Wait a minute... so what if the courtroom is full of objective thinkers? Does intent matter or doesn't it? The principle should always be the same.

I'm suggesting that objectively, no harm done. So what is the big deal over?

Proving that someone is a troll based on her self assertion that she is a troll is circular and hearsay. If she maliciously insulted someone that would be a tangible offense.

Catatonic's designation as a troll seems to be one person's subjective opinion.

Unfortunately that person wield's the ban hammer and we must live by the rules as this is not a democracy.

And, obviously, there is no freedom of speech.
 

Coolydudey

You could say that.
Local time
Today 6:20 AM
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
1,039
---
Location
Pensive-land.....
Wow, this exploded!
My opinion is that, even if you do distinguish trolls' intent as being "for the sake of it" or for some other reason, they should still both be labeled trolls (even though one is a troll, and the other exhibits troll-like behaviour), since the experience of a third person is the same for both people.

On the other hand, someone who trolls (mildly) for some other purpose, as noted in my OP, can be quite beneficial to a discussion.

@DeadonDreaming sorry for my loose usage of the word troll to describe you. I use to have a mindset very similar to yours, but eventually grew out of it.
 

NinjaSurfer

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
730
---
Wow, this exploded!
My opinion is that, even if you do distinguish trolls' intent as being "for the sake of it" or for some other reason, they should still both be labeled trolls (even though one is a troll, and the other exhibits troll-like behaviour), since the experience of a third person is the same for both people.

On the other hand, someone who trolls (mildly) for some other purpose, as noted in my OP, can be quite beneficial to a discussion.

@DeadonDreaming sorry for my loose usage of the word troll to describe you. I use to have a mindset very similar to yours, but eventually grew out of it.

Lol
You gonna apologize for calling him immature too?
You def need to work on your Fe
 

Coolydudey

You could say that.
Local time
Today 6:20 AM
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
1,039
---
Location
Pensive-land.....
Nah, just thought I'd be professional about it. On the other hand, when did I ever say he was immature (different than implying it).

Also, forgot to say that someone can not be a troll and exhibit troll-like behaviour. They just happen to be behaving like a troll.
 
Local time
Today 3:20 AM
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
705
---

pernoctator

a bearded robocop
Local time
Today 12:20 AM
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
444
---
I'm suggesting that objectively, no harm done. So what is the big deal over?

Proving that someone is a troll based on her self assertion that she is a troll is circular and hearsay. If she maliciously insulted someone that would be a tangible offense.

Everything you just said there is totally subjective, though. Throwing in objectively and tangible doesn't make it so. How do you measure "malicious insulting"? What is it; how is it more legitimate an offense than "trying to annoy"?

By the way, I'm only talking concepts here, not particulars. I don't know anything about this Catatonic incident. I'm just commenting on your misunderstanding of Cognisant's perspective. I don't see how anyone has suggested that admitting to being a troll is an offense in and of itself.
 

NinjaSurfer

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
730
---
Everything you just said there is totally subjective, though. Throwing in objectively and tangible doesn't make it so. How do you measure "malicious insulting"? What is it; how is it more legitimate an offense than "trying to annoy"?

By the way, I'm only talking concepts here, not particulars. I don't know anything about this Catatonic incident. I'm just commenting on your misunderstanding of Cognisant's perspective. I don't see how anyone has suggested that admitting to being a troll is an offense in and of itself.


I'm mostly annoyed when otherwise interesting people get banned

I probably did misunderstand cognisant's intent since the backdrop of catatonic's banning somewhat overshadows this conversation as well

The reason Fukyo banned her is only because she said she was "trolling"
 

kora

Omg wow imo
Local time
Today 4:20 AM
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Messages
2,275
---
Location
Armchair
I'm mostly annoyed when otherwise interesting people get banned

I probably did misunderstand cognisant's intent since the backdrop of catatonic's banning somewhat overshadows this conversation as well

The reason Fukyo banned her is only because she said she was "trolling"

I don't think it was just the fact she said she was trolling, it was the "tone" of her post on the other forum where she said she was (my Fe is coming along well). There was something sort of malicious, like "haha all the dumbasses on this other forum". It just didn't make it look like she was interested in this place other than for trolling the people who had opposite views to her own (religious fundamentalist). As for the other more "acceptable" trolls here...Keep up the good work.
 

Hadoblado

think again losers
Local time
Today 12:50 PM
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
7,590
---
I would posit that a troll is someone who's worth as a member is entirely canceled out by their trolling disposition. Anyone who is displays troll like behaviour but is still considered a valuable member, is not a troll, just someone that troll on occasion.

Of course, member worth is entirely subjective, so perhaps that should be determined democratically?
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Yesterday 4:20 PM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,393
---
Unfortunately that person wield's the ban hammer and we must live by the rules as this is not a democracy.
Thank fuck for that, I'd hate to see this place become democratically corrupt.
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 11:20 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
Unfortunately that person wield's the ban hammer and we must live by the rules as this is not a democracy.
There is a fortune in that. Most posters I imagine are interested in their posting. Moderators have the interest of the Forum in mind, I hope.

Are self-confessed "trolls" bad for the Forum? What about the accused or suspected who deny it?

To paraphrase President Nixon, "I am not a troll."
 

NinjaSurfer

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
730
---
To paraphrase Jerry Sandusky

"I did not have sexual relations with that boy. Nor that boy. Nor that one, that one that one that one..."
 

NinjaSurfer

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
730
---
Trolls should be revered and not hunted!!!

220px-TrollHunter.jpg
 

Fukyo

blurb blurb
Local time
Today 5:20 AM
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
4,289
---
People just love bitching about everything, don't they...Was one thread not enough for complaints about catatonic?


It's because "troll" and "trolling" have merely become synonymous with "annoying to a moderator" and an overused label which nobody (including Wikipedia) can really define

lol

If I banned everyone who annoyed me here at some point, boy they'd be dropping like flies. :D

Cognisant, whom you mentioned has annoyed me on multiple occasions and as you can see he hasn't been banned, and he's not my friend, just an acquaintance. (we're still okay though, right coggy? :yaoi: xoxo)

It's funny you accuse me of bias when you and Dod are certainly fond of catatonic.



By most definitions, everyone is a troll. This is because the root intent of any one's action is attention-seeking behavior.

There is no difference between your behavior and catatonic's
Or mine for that matter
We are expressing opinions and evoking emotions

No. You are reducing the definition to the point where it becomes meaningless and ignoring all nuance to justify how it's ok and even desirable. Yes, differences certainly do exist.

Your understanding of why catatonic was banned is narrow, literal and doesn't take the context, nor implications in account, either because you are facetious on purpose, or just don't get it. higs on the other hand, noticed the reasoning.

Cog might have admitted to 'trolling', but he's a long standing member (which demonstrates investment, not a privileged status), who cares about what he puts out, about what he's saying, in other words he respects this space and the people. catatonic didn't. The timing of her post demonstrates she pretty much came here to troll.

Much like her "troll friend" (her words) DeadonDreaming who also openly stated that he's a troll and told her she can write whatever the hell she wants like he does. See, this is disrespect. It's comparable to people who mess up public restrooms and throw their old sofa out on someone's lawn, because who the fuck cares someone else is using this space? I'm just gonna dump my trash indiscriminately wherever the hell I want.

To put it metaphorically, if someone is constantly shitting in a park multiple people congregate in I'm going to remove the shitter before their shit piles up, stinks the place up and attracts flies. You can call if censorship if you'd like; freedom of speech is an increasingly misused concept used to justify various things.


What else is a troll if not just a misunderstood character within society, outcast, attempting to emotionally connect with others, albeit in a rare fashion? And when their form of communication encroaches upon your boundaries of acceptability, setting off your annoyance alarms, the troll bell rings strong and the ban hammer falls hard.

That might be your own motivation, but don't assume it applies to everyone. Pardon me if I'm stepping over some personal boundary; but I get the sense you have a personal gripe with "trolls" as you define them above being banned and in the light of that are seeing catatonic's banning as more tragic than it is. (need I remind you she very likely doesn't even care?)

The person who harasses others for entertainment, and hacks into a forum to fuck it up, who turns members of a board against each other, sows paranoia and discord is destructive with varying degrees of malice, and is not excusable.

Also, while you might not be aware administration has had patience for posters considered to be trolling who tried to connect in convoluted ways in the past...

Catatronic didn't try anything of the sort and I don't see how she would be excused on grounds of somehow being misunderstood; her sexuality was never a factor in banning her, and I honestly have no problem with other people's sexuality.

Questioning things, devil's advocacy, parody, making people reassess their views, are not trolling. They are distinct behaviors that can be combined with trolling but do not constitute trolling on their own. As Hadoblado mentioned there are degrees of "trolishness" that are permissible, but cease being so when they outweigh the other things a poster is bringing to the table.

Proving that someone is a troll based on her self assertion that she is a troll is circular and hearsay.

It's not hearsay, uncle G.I. I know you administrate the forum I referenced. We could, as you say in absence of hard proof compare IPs of catatonic's suspected accounts but I'm not going to trivialize and expose a member's privacy, even a banned one for the sake of proving something to you.

I am also aware of your own admission of having been banned from here in 2010, y'know, and even though we have a general policy of not allowing ban evasion I didn't ban you the moment I saw it, because your behavior wasn't so bad, and I gave you a second chance.


Trolling fits into the porn category-- I know it when I see it.

You, catatonic and DeadonDreaming were all noticed as potential trolls by the administration from the start. We didn't ban anyone for months because we're more lenient that you think. Catatonic's smug bragging, which demonstrates a lack of respect and the intent to rile people up for entertainment was the last drop, in a manner of speaking, and a confirmation of our instincts.

DeadonDreaming is increasingly teetering towards the edge, and I have a feeling he's daring us to ban him; if he cares at all he can take this as a warning.

If he doesn't well....that's his own right.
 

EyeSeeCold

lust for life
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
7,828
---
Location
California, USA
Are self-confessed "trolls" bad for the Forum? What about the accused or suspected who deny it?

To paraphrase President Nixon, "I am not a troll."

"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'troll' is". :p

Fukyo said:
I am also aware of your own admission of having been banned from here in 2010, y'know, and even though we have a general policy of not allowing ban evasion I didn't ban you the moment I saw it, because your behavior wasn't so bad, and I gave you a second chance.
@NinjaSurfer

DesertSmeagle or MunkySpanker?
 
Local time
Today 3:20 AM
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
705
---
People just love bitching about everything, don't they...Was one thread not enough for complaints about catatonic?

Calm down broseph. I don't care, you ban whoever you want. If you interpret my behavior as trollish, fine, no one else here seems to care, just like no one cared about Cat.
 

EyeSeeCold

lust for life
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
7,828
---
Location
California, USA
DesertSmeagle coincides with the time frame, but really if it's him...it's a huge change. I was really surprised, personally. :confused:

Nah, I forgot DesertSmeagle said he lives in NY, so it couldn't be him.


A 2010 reunion would be nice though.
 
Local time
Today 3:20 AM
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
705
---
Lol
You gonna apologize for calling him immature too?
You def need to work on your Fe

It doesn't matter, we all grow in different directions, go to different areas. I'm not offended. I've always liked figuring what makes people tick, or animals in general, hence why I'd light ant colonies on fire to get to see the queen come out. Considering this is a public internet board, which really should be a place where we can express things of a much wider nature than is allowed in meatspace (something Fukyo seems to disagree with, considering his disrespect analogy), it allows more freedom to hear how people really think without transgressing social rules. Maybe one day I'll think differently. Maybe one day Fukyo will think differently, considering he is all of 22 years young, yet seems to be so defensive about being right. He'll "grow" into my way of thinking.
 

EyeSeeCold

lust for life
Local time
Yesterday 8:20 PM
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
7,828
---
Location
California, USA
Not like changing the place of residence is impossible.

Well, that's true but including other factors that I won't get into publicly, I'm pretty sure it's not him.
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 11:20 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'troll' is". :p
We can all come up with our own definitions and then combine them in a cooperative effort rejecting harmful, superfluous and unnecessary traits.
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Yesterday 11:20 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
I thought you said all of you were trolls? Well you aren't. I am not either no matter how much it looks like it.:slashnew:
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Yesterday 4:20 PM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,393
---
Cog might have admitted to 'trolling', but he's a long standing member (which demonstrates investment, not a privileged status), who cares about what he puts out, about what he's saying, in other words he respects this space and the people.
ROFL XD

Cognisant, whom you mentioned has annoyed me on multiple occasions and as you can see he hasn't been banned, and he's not my friend, just an acquaintance. (we're still okay though, right coggy? xoxo)
Of course darling, of course.
ed5d7fb0d364b3487dce33962d55243dbadb570d.jpg

You're not biased, I'm just special :D
 

Kuu

>>Loading
Local time
Yesterday 9:20 PM
Joined
Jun 7, 2008
Messages
3,459
---
Location
The wired
Considering this is a public internet board, which really should be a place where we can express things of a much wider nature than is allowed in meatspace (something Fukyo seems to disagree with, considering his disrespect analogy), it allows more freedom to hear how people really think without transgressing social rules.

Except there are social rules on internet boards. And it's considerably hard to see how people really think when everyone is drowning in a flood of inanity and hardly any thinking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom