BurnedOut
Your friendly neighborhood asshole
Apathy. I consider authority as a tool to get shit done. I usually don't adhere to the established rules and sometimes am lucky enough to be granted that leeway.
In general, I detest authority and have had some problems with it but usually I am too absent-mindedness or occupied in my work to pay attention to anything but the deadline. Other than that, I don't care if somebody is elder to me or more accomplished or popular. These things don't matter to me. As a result, I have no problem with being blunt to authority when I am pissed but I also ensure that I victimize myself appropriately to prevent the authority from further abusing their power because most commonly most leaders hate to be socially accountable to somebody. If you portray them as a dictator, they quickly get in line. This is because 9/10, the said leader does make the rules and is too high in the sky to even think about these 'rules'. They dream of becoming popular more than getting work done efficiently. If the said leader proceeds to debate with me, I have zero trouble proving their (fictional or real) guilt in the situation which makes them leave me alone.
The disadvantage of this is that I have to be as self-sufficient as possible in all aspects and furthermore ensure that I come off as being altruistic to seal my deal in a group setting.
In general, I detest authority and have had some problems with it but usually I am too absent-mindedness or occupied in my work to pay attention to anything but the deadline. Other than that, I don't care if somebody is elder to me or more accomplished or popular. These things don't matter to me. As a result, I have no problem with being blunt to authority when I am pissed but I also ensure that I victimize myself appropriately to prevent the authority from further abusing their power because most commonly most leaders hate to be socially accountable to somebody. If you portray them as a dictator, they quickly get in line. This is because 9/10, the said leader does make the rules and is too high in the sky to even think about these 'rules'. They dream of becoming popular more than getting work done efficiently. If the said leader proceeds to debate with me, I have zero trouble proving their (fictional or real) guilt in the situation which makes them leave me alone.
The disadvantage of this is that I have to be as self-sufficient as possible in all aspects and furthermore ensure that I come off as being altruistic to seal my deal in a group setting.
I lead a single life on most part. Close ones, I can be myself with. In unfamiliar settings, I have no choice but to engage in reciprocating behaviours. This is generally not a big enough problem because unlike most other people who are active on social media, I don't have to consider the effect of my decisions on my social media persona which is also tied to my social persona. By being relatively successful at detaching from my super ego when necessary, I am free to work on my abilities for as long as I am interested. I have calculated the trade-off between autodidactic behaviour and social engagement. So far, I have been pretty happy about it. By not having to give too many shits about super-ego, it is surprising for many people (but not for me) to see me jump leaps and bounds in something I am investing my time in. This protects me from being vulnerable to external social factors to a good degree. Perhaps that is why I was able to get out of my major depression phase in just a year in comparison to the general cases wherein the time taken is a lot more than this.