Where did the electron come from ?

[s0cratus]

Where did the electron come from ?
From vacuum of course
Why?
Because according to QED electron disappears
in vacuum having infinite parameters. And because
“ The law of conservation and transformation
energy/mass” doesn’t give him to die there –
he must appear again according to " a method
of renormalization " and the law of ‘reincarnation’
==.
socratus

 

[sachin]

Think outside the box u may get it

 

[s0cratus]

Think outside the box u may get it

The question is:
in which reference frame this box is hidden ?

 

[s0cratus]

In 1928 Dirac said that not only electron can exist
but also antielectron must exist.

But much more before in 1916 the same was said
by A. Sommerfeld : e = +ah*c and e = -ah*c.


Why do we never talk about this fact ?

==.

 

[s0cratus]

I think that it is interesting to understand the Sommerfeld
formula e^2=hca.
Why?
Because until now nobody explained what ( a ) -
( fine structure constant ) is.
And on Feynman’s expression (a ) quantity is
‘ by the god given damnation to all physicists ‘.
==.
Therefore in the internet is possible to find 100 models of electron.
For example.
The book "What is the Electron?"
Volodimir Simulik
Montreal, Canada. 2005. /
http://redshift.vif.com/BookBlurbs/Electron.htm

More than ten different models of the electron are presented here. (!!!)
More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!)
Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical
thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.

But no one of these models is recognized as right.
==.

 

[Iximi]

Seeing as an electron appears to have some mass- this question would be more easily answered if the Higgs boson is confirmed to exist. Being able to fully understand the mechanisms that facilitated the emergence of the electron (and positron) is exactly the realm modern particle physicists operate in. A new periodic table of sorts is being organized as we speak, one in which the electron is just one of many.

To me, it seems as if the electron is nothing more than a manifestation of a more fundamental force hidden away from view; something that is almost impossible to observe given that we can only operate within the parameters of our own vacua. There is no doubt in my mind that we will discover that all these sub- atomic particles we observe will turn out to have a common parameter that is simply adjusted differently between them.

 

[DetachedRetina]

"From vacuum of course." Hahahahahaha. Yes the origins of things are quite obvious.

Socrates: the original troll.

 

[s0cratus]

"From vacuum of course." Hahahahahaha.
Yes the origins of things are quite obvious.

Socrates: the original troll.

#
" The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? "
/ Paul Dirac ./
#
The most fundamental question facing 21st century physics will be:
What is the vacuum? As quantum mechanics teaches us, with
its zero point energy this vacuum is not empty and the word
vacuum is a gross misnomer!
/ Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg /
#
Wikipedia :
“ Unfortunately neither the concept of space nor of time is well defined,
resulting in a dilemma. If we don't know the character of time nor of space,
how can we characterize either? “
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
#
"Now we know that the vacuum can have all sorts of wonderful effects
over an enormous range of scales, from the microscopic to the cosmic,"
said Peter Milonni
from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
#
Although we are used to thinking of empty space as containing
nothing at all, and therefore having zero energy, the quantum
rules say that there is some uncertainty about this. Perhaps each
tiny bit of the vacuum actually contains rather a lot of energy.
If the vacuum contained enough energy, it could convert this
into particles, in line with E-Mc^2.
/ Book: Stephen Hawking. Pages 147-148.
By Michael White and John Gribbin. /
#
Somehow, the energy is extracted from the vacuum and turned into
particles...Don't try it in your basement, but you can do it.
/ University of Chicago cosmologist Rocky Kolb./
#
Vacuum -- the very name suggests emptiness and nothingness –
is actually a realm rife with potentiality, courtesy of the laws
of quantum electrodynamics (QED). According to QED,
additional, albeit virtual, particles can be created in the vacuum,
allowing light-light interactions.
http://www.aip.org/pnu/2006/768.html
#
Dark energy may be vacuum
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-01/uoc-dem011607.php
#
When the next revolution rocks physics,
chances are it will be about nothing—the vacuum,
that endless infinite void.
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/aug/18-nothingness-of-space-theory-of-everything

!
==========.

 

[s0cratus]

"From vacuum of course." Hahahahahaha.
Yes the origins of things are quite obvious.

Socrates: the original troll.

Book : A Universe from Nothing?
by Sean Carroll

http://networkedblogs.com/x0svI


April 28th, 2012 2:55 PM
in Philosophy, Science, Top Posts | 86 comments I

You can take part in this discussion and continue to laugh.
===.

 

[A22]

Electrons are being formed as I pack my snacks with my vacuum sealer. Awesome.

 

[Pizzabeak]

Book : A Universe from Nothing?
by Sean Carroll

http://networkedblogs.com/x0svI


April 28th, 2012 2:55 PM
in Philosophy, Science, Top Posts | 86 comments I

You can take part in this discussion and continue to laugh.
===.

Who is that man in your avatar?