But 2, 3, 4...also implies existence.B| Opposite of one is nothing - 1 implies existence, 0/null/nothing implies non-existence. Presence vs. absence.
I get "easily grasped" but smallest? what about .000000...1?C} Opposite of one is infinity - The smallest and the largest. Condensed, dispersed. Easily grasped or unfathomable.
Ooh, interesting. I like to think of the relationship between 1 and 2 as Objective and Subjective. 1 exists on its own empirically(the universe). 2 and everything else requires a subject.D| Opposite of one is two - This is the most blatantly human-in-3-dimensions interpretation, I think. It is somehow attractive. 1 is unity, 2 is polarity. Cohesion vs. conflict.
I'm not sure what it would be in that context - It's easier to imagine a system of actions instead of quantities, where 0 is baseline, 1 is addition and -1 is subtraction. It's a debt more than just an absence, anyways.If 1 represents presence and 0 represents absence, what does -1 represent? A presumed presence but an actual absence?
Yeah... 1 is the purest, though, and every otherBut 2, 3, 4...also implies existence.
I was working on the assumption that we mainly understand quantities as integers, one in this case being an undefined unit, just the smallest number of thing.I get "easily grasped" but smallest? what about .000000...1?
Cool! Was also thinking, in terms of counting and order,Ooh, interesting. I like to think of the relationship between 1 and 2 as Objective and Subjective. 1 exists on its own empirically(the universe). 2 and everything else requires a subject.
The opposite of 1 is humans.[or human constructs or the constructs of any sentient life form capable of counting.]
What if you multiply them?
What's the opposite of 0, or 3.5, or 1/3, or any other number that exists in the real number line? There is no 'general' answer, it all depends on how you define it. It's a ridiculous and meaningless question without any context.
Well?
Perhaps.. the opposite of 1 is i. Since 1 is a real number, and i imaginary o.o
I can understand this well enough, but in that case I would like to pick at word choice a bit and say that 'negation' is a much better and more exact word than 'opposite'.The opposite of a number is defined as how I stated it.
Therefore:
-0 (it's its own opposite)
-3.5
-1/3
Using 1 as an on state and 0 as an off state does not make 0 the opposite of 1.
I could use 57 as the on state and 84,520 as the off state. They are merely opposite states, not numbers.
(Technically it'd be E in hexadecimal, 14 is the decimal equivalent of that hex number)Hexadecimal: 14 (since one is the second number after zero and 15 is the second last before 15)
Agreed.What's the opposite of 0, or 3.5, or 1/3, or any other number that exists in the real number line? There is no 'general' answer, it all depends on how you define it. It's a ridiculous and meaningless question without any context.
nil said:I can understand this well enough, but in that case I would like to pick at word choice a bit and say that 'negation' is a much better and more exact word than 'opposite'.
What is the opposite of a house? ^^
Prison
Interesting.
Apparently, office is an antonym of house. Some say a hotel could qualify as an opposite of a house.
What is the opposite of a potato?![]()
The hole in the ground left when you remove the potato? Be careful to remove the potato carefully to achieve this effect.What is the opposite of a potato?![]()
The hole in the ground left when you remove the potato? Be careful to remove the potato carefully to achieve this effect.
Extra careful? What is careful of carefully? Appears legis.
Meta-careful.
What is the opposite of "to cleave"?
This should have been named: Answer the question above and pose a new
(question which has the same pattern).
That shouldn't in the future be unamed; Question an answer below or unpose many old )answers which had a different choatic structure(?