-
OK, it's on.
what happened to the human relationships board
- Thread starter LAM
- Start date
Anthile
Steel marks flesh
- Local time
- Today 8:07 PM
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 3,987
LAM
Active Member
- Local time
- Tomorrow 6:07 AM
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Messages
- 345
I can't find it/see it on my http://intpforum.com/ page. How do you get to it?
Edit: I seem to be missing some other boards as well.
Edit: I seem to be missing some other boards as well.
Claverhouse
Royalist Freicorps Feldgendarme
- Local time
- Today 7:07 PM
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2007
- Messages
- 1,159
- Location
- Between the Harz and Carpathians
I can't guess why you're not seeing several sub-forums; yet it's possible that as Human Relationships was moved to the Inner Sanctum --- to prevent the profane from viewing intp intimacies --- when you are not seeing it, it's because you aren't logged in ( occasionally, generally through hitting an internal ink within a post, I've been sent to an unlogged-in page in the next tab --- whether this is a Fx thing or a VB thing belongs to a theoretical physics aka 'How Many Angels Can Dance On The Point Of A Needle' school of enquiry ).
Claverhouse
Claverhouse
Jesin
Prolific Member
- Local time
- Today 2:07 PM
- Joined
- May 2, 2008
- Messages
- 2,036
Yes, apparently http://intpforum.com/ and http://www.intpforum.com/ count as different domain names when storing login cookies.
LAM
Active Member
- Local time
- Tomorrow 6:07 AM
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Messages
- 345
Ah so thats whats been happening. Thats why I also keep having to login <_<
Claverhouse
Royalist Freicorps Feldgendarme
- Local time
- Today 7:07 PM
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2007
- Messages
- 1,159
- Location
- Between the Harz and Carpathians
Unfortunately, post the move to URLJet, the default appeared to change to the morose and depressing, minimalist post-modern inferior uncanonical of no-www. In VB it is set as http://intpforum.com/ and to change it now would have consequences; partly for reasons you may surmise from Jesin's post.
It's a pity. A more elastic cookie tolerance would be nice; however the real shame is that in the interests of eliminating 3 euphonious characters from addresses which commonly run from 50 - 100 characters the meddling puritans did not leave well enough alone and permit only ://www.
Actually... that shouldn't happen that often: I should suggest you look at the cookie-handling and cookie-storage of your Fx. Firefox has this habit of suddenly developing a fault for no easily apparent reason. ( At this moment my own beast has separately started whining about a corrupted toolbar and --- over the last two days --- begun not stopping increasing both memory and cpu usage until it hits the max... )
Claverhouse
It's a pity. A more elastic cookie tolerance would be nice; however the real shame is that in the interests of eliminating 3 euphonious characters from addresses which commonly run from 50 - 100 characters the meddling puritans did not leave well enough alone and permit only ://www.
LAM said:
Actually... that shouldn't happen that often: I should suggest you look at the cookie-handling and cookie-storage of your Fx. Firefox has this habit of suddenly developing a fault for no easily apparent reason. ( At this moment my own beast has separately started whining about a corrupted toolbar and --- over the last two days --- begun not stopping increasing both memory and cpu usage until it hits the max... )
Claverhouse