nanook
a scream in a vortex
I believe that most of my intelligence is based on a form of visualisation. Not with colorful imagination or anything visible (don't panic, AK!), but in the sense that i have a map of the organic functional structures of reality, such as of the functionalities of the human psyche, in the same way you have an idea about how a cap needs to be turned left to open and right to close.
When i say that typology is a tool for psychoanalysis, what i really mean is that it's helping me to become aware of the different organs and their activity, so that i can build up a memory map of their common phenomena.
Then, when i seem to "analyse" a written paragraph for which cognitive functions must have been involved in the making of that paragraph, i am just comparing pseudo visual ideas in very much the same way, i do, when i literally draw an image on paper and compare the pencil stoke with my inner image, judging whether it's accurate or needs slight correction .....
As a child, everyone complimented on my abilities to draw. I was always one of the two best students in art class. No one ever commented positively on any other aspect of me, most certainly no teacher, until i discovered the internet and began to share my psychological insights ....
So it's probably accurate, that all of the insights i share on this message board are not truly an achievement of thinking, of judgement?
I still find it hard to become conscious of what exactly (my) thinking does and contributes, during the act. Perhaps a hint towards me being INFP.
I know that the world analysis is often used to mean something different: a process of poking the real world, so that it spits out data, that was entirely hidden before, much like hacking software perhaps (i don't know what i am talking about). much like playing chess perhaps. much like an inspector who provokes a person to accidentally reveal a secret, by saying certain things.
I don't know if i am any good at analysis, in this sense of the word.
Okay, that means i am not, obviously.
I seem intuitive or perceptive, according to common sense definition of these words. in that i "just know" what i know. Which is the instant result of comparing patterns.
To some of you, i probably sound like a broken record, because you have seen me illustrate most of my understanding twice.
When i don't know something, i don't necessarily come up with a strategy about how to find it out. When i deal with a mechanical situation, i will probably be able to play around randomly, then comparison allows me to figure it out. This way i can solve a rubics cube in very little time. (I have had one in my hands only once and solved it in a few moments - the smartass who had it before me might have helped).
But there seems little conscious far sighted strategy about how i can "analyse a problem". I wouldn't describe myself as a problem solver anyway.
I just see problems everywhere, lol. Shit going out of hand, because our actions aren't aligned with the organic nature of things. I might prevent those problems from happening ...
However i am extremely hypothesis forming, and the mechanism behind that is in deed visual creativity again. I just imagine functional organs, that might be the actors behind the data, that i know.
When i say that typology is a tool for psychoanalysis, what i really mean is that it's helping me to become aware of the different organs and their activity, so that i can build up a memory map of their common phenomena.
Then, when i seem to "analyse" a written paragraph for which cognitive functions must have been involved in the making of that paragraph, i am just comparing pseudo visual ideas in very much the same way, i do, when i literally draw an image on paper and compare the pencil stoke with my inner image, judging whether it's accurate or needs slight correction .....
As a child, everyone complimented on my abilities to draw. I was always one of the two best students in art class. No one ever commented positively on any other aspect of me, most certainly no teacher, until i discovered the internet and began to share my psychological insights ....
So it's probably accurate, that all of the insights i share on this message board are not truly an achievement of thinking, of judgement?
I still find it hard to become conscious of what exactly (my) thinking does and contributes, during the act. Perhaps a hint towards me being INFP.
I know that the world analysis is often used to mean something different: a process of poking the real world, so that it spits out data, that was entirely hidden before, much like hacking software perhaps (i don't know what i am talking about). much like playing chess perhaps. much like an inspector who provokes a person to accidentally reveal a secret, by saying certain things.
I don't know if i am any good at analysis, in this sense of the word.
Okay, that means i am not, obviously.
I seem intuitive or perceptive, according to common sense definition of these words. in that i "just know" what i know. Which is the instant result of comparing patterns.
To some of you, i probably sound like a broken record, because you have seen me illustrate most of my understanding twice.
When i don't know something, i don't necessarily come up with a strategy about how to find it out. When i deal with a mechanical situation, i will probably be able to play around randomly, then comparison allows me to figure it out. This way i can solve a rubics cube in very little time. (I have had one in my hands only once and solved it in a few moments - the smartass who had it before me might have helped).
But there seems little conscious far sighted strategy about how i can "analyse a problem". I wouldn't describe myself as a problem solver anyway.
I just see problems everywhere, lol. Shit going out of hand, because our actions aren't aligned with the organic nature of things. I might prevent those problems from happening ...
However i am extremely hypothesis forming, and the mechanism behind that is in deed visual creativity again. I just imagine functional organs, that might be the actors behind the data, that i know.
