Artsu Tharaz
The Lamb
- Local time
- Today 10:12 PM
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2010
- Messages
- 3,134
Typing should hypothetically be doable to a quite accurate degree by analysing a typical sample of text created by someone. This is assuming language production comes from extroverted judgement.
Is the language
- qualitative/summarising or quantitative/descriptive (P vs J)
- flowing/inconclusive or rigid/conclusive (p vs j)
- figurative/abstract or literal/straightforward (Ni vs Si)
- absolute/factual or relative/opinionated (Te vs Fe)
[not to say for example that the Te expression isn't opinion loaded, but the expression is as though it were factual]
(note: difference between say, INTJ and ESFP is that one is quantitative and the other is qualitative, leading to possible total backwards interpretation of information if you get this bit confused)
Does this sound about right?
I'll try some examples or someone else can.
Is the language
- qualitative/summarising or quantitative/descriptive (P vs J)
- flowing/inconclusive or rigid/conclusive (p vs j)
- figurative/abstract or literal/straightforward (Ni vs Si)
- absolute/factual or relative/opinionated (Te vs Fe)
[not to say for example that the Te expression isn't opinion loaded, but the expression is as though it were factual]
(note: difference between say, INTJ and ESFP is that one is quantitative and the other is qualitative, leading to possible total backwards interpretation of information if you get this bit confused)
Does this sound about right?
I'll try some examples or someone else can.