type preference and attraction

[loveofreason]

I found this http://similarminds.com/pref_jung.html posted on the INTJ Forum and thought it was worth sharing.

This similarminds test gives you three results: your actualised type, your preferred type (how you'd like to be) and the type you're attracted to.

I was hoping it would come up with something bizarre and unexpected, but nope. I scored INTP/INTP/INTP.

 

[Vrecknidj]

Interesting.

INFJ/INFJ/ISFJ

I'm not an INFJ, I'm an INTP. The first time I took the test (15+ years ago), I tested as an IXTX. In other words, My N/S axis was split evenly and my P/J axis was split evenly. Over time, however, it's become clear that I think like, behave like, and feel like an INTP more than I do any of the other types. I have quite a bit of the pragmatism of an INTJ, and I have a lot more of the practical functioning of an S type than most N types I know (but I know that's a result of my father's influence--he was such an ISFJ that I had no choice--I was squeezed into an SJ's costume despite it not fitting).

And, my wife is an INFP who grew up as an ENFP. We're married 19 years and so, despite what the test says I'm attracted to, I'm not convinced people should try to hard to stick with what it suggests.

Thank you for the link though, it's a nice test (a bit on the long side though).

Dave

 

[Ermine]

INTJ (close tie between P and J)/ENTP/ENTP

Interesting. I'm most attracted to what I want to be. I guess I'm more like an INTJ when I rely on the skills that I have learned as opposed to my more innate traits, but I'm an all around INTP.

great test, but it was really long and repetitive. I could have sworn I answered some of the same questions 5 or 6 times.

 

[loveofreason]

I wouldn't take any of these kinds of tests too seriously, because they rely on truthfulness and self-knowledge and cannot account for all of human complexity, but they can be fun.

The repetition in this one is actually its strength - a tool for fine-tuning the response and drawing attention to the subtleties of meaning that can be overlooked... great for fuzzy minds like mine

 

[Zeke Johnson]

I'm only interested in the dreaded ESFJ. But there is a very important logical reason behind this. There can only be two types of relationship, your compliment, INTP and your opposite ESFJ. But the rub is whats the point in going out with someone similar or exactly like you?.

The Heroic thing to do is to attempt ( Hard to achieve by any means ) a relationship with an ESFJ. Namely the energy between the two is very powerful, as with any opposites, but the point is, a path to the middle ground is through your opposite or shadow (ESFJ).

Through a relationship with an ESFJ, creating a total personality is possible. Coupled with the transcendent relationship proto-type, it can create a starting point to connecting with the world itself.

Do you really want to go out with someone just like you?

Zeke Johnson ( Ex-Captain )

 

[mm1991]

INTP/INTP/ENFP

 

[loveofreason]

I'm only interested in the dreaded ESFJ. But there is a very important logical reason behind this. There can only be two types of relationship, your compliment, INTP and your opposite ESFJ. But the rub is whats the point in going out with someone similar or exactly like you?.

The Heroic thing to do is to attempt ( Hard to achieve by any means ) a relationship with an ESFJ. Namely the energy between the two is very powerful, as with any opposites, but the point is, a path to the middle ground is through your opposite or shadow (ESFJ).

Through a relationship with an ESFJ, creating a total personality is possible. Coupled with the transcendent relationship proto-type, it can create a starting point to connecting with the world itself.

Do you really want to go out with someone just like you?*

Zeke Johnson ( Ex-Captain )

I like your theory, but what is the object of a relationship?

Wait! Don't answer here, I'll go give that a thread of it's own.

*Go out with someone just like me? And never get a straight answer? That'd be cosmic justice

 

[Wisp]

Hmmm... I think Zeke may be mis-informed about the role of the shadow function... The role of the shadow function, if used properly, is as a way of softening your typological edges. However, trying to embody the shadow function will only result in stress. Embodying parts, for a short time, fine. But embodying the whole thing is impossible (typologically) and will, as weasel stated, result in breakdown state. Personally I believe that the optimal pair has 1-2 different letters, so they have differences to spice things up, but have similarities to find common ground....

Oh, BTW I got...

INTP/INTP/INTP

Oh, and all the letters were over 70%.... @_@

 

[farlda]

Interesting, I got INFP/INFP/ENTP
Though for the first it was literally 50.27% F and 49.73% T, and the second 52.55% F and 47.45% T

I'm like hairlessbluetick in how I find no one attractive until I know their personality, which has had some unfortunate consequences. Usually by the time I find them attractive, they've already found someone else. Not that I'm all that bothered at the moment, I'm only 15, but it doesn't half annoy me when my friends are waffling on about their respective girl/boyfriends.

 

[tesseracter]

As for the test - I didn't take it. But, I'm pretty sure I married an INTJ - basically, someone pretty similar to myself. We get along great! We are not touchy/feely - we are not exhibitionists - we don't fret over remembering birthdays and stuff. We basically tell each other - hey, buy yourself something for your birthday! Neither of us are offended. We have the same mind when it comes to budgets.

The way that we are different are: my husband tends to be a leader and has more confidence in his abilities. I tend to research and think a LOT more about stuff. I give him the info he wants so that he can take the info and make the wisest decision (I waffle too much). It's a pretty good way to live.

 

[farlda]

I love slang, so many possibilities!

I came across this chart comparing the relationships between personality types. I thought it could be interesting in this context:
http://socionics.com/rel/relcht.htm

 

[Wisp]

Sounds like a healthy INTP / INTJ relationship to me. =)

 

[Yozuki]

Yozuki is the IXXX, too much the fluctuation. Base the INTP, then the INTJ, then finally the Introvert, the Intuition, the fluctuation of the thinking, the main difference the feeling, and mainly the scoundrel switching of perceiving and judgemental.

Yozuki is the laughing and the scratching the head.

 

[Death]

INTP / INTP / INTP

..but my personal choice is an INTJ.Someone who can get things done..

 

[loveofreason]

I came across this chart comparing the relationships between personality types. I thought it could be interesting in this context:
http://socionics.com/rel/relcht.htm

I haven't looked into the socionics types before, but the MBTI type needs to be converted to its socionics correlation before the chart can be used accurately.

Though I/E, S/N and T/F are equivalent, j/p is not the same as the Myers-Briggs J/P

A Myers-Briggs INTP = socionics INTj. But all this is explained on their website.


Yozuki, have you tracked the manifestations of your fluctuating types? Is there a pattern? The bottom line is MBTI is a sometimes useful tool and a fun toy, but not the absolute final word on who we are.

 

[Yozuki]

I haven't looked into the socionics types before, but the MBTI type needs to be converted to its socionics correlation before the chart can be used accurately.

Though I/E, S/N and T/F are equivalent, j/p is not the same as the Myers-Briggs J/P

A Myers-Briggs INTP = socionics INTj. But all this is explained on their website.


Yozuki, have you tracked the manifestations of your fluctuating types? Is there a pattern? The bottom line is MBTI is a sometimes useful tool and a fun toy, but not the absolute final word on who we are.

This cannot be easily answered in my current style of speaking (DAMN YOU!), so a more down to earth and technical approach is required.

My base is an INFP, I've been that since a kid. I believe highly in chivalry, treating people with respect, avoiding eye contact, being warm and compassionate to other humans, and otherwise giving them the benefit of the doubt. I believe I can reason with my enemy and make them my friend. Romance is the one thing I pursue to the highest. Romance is an ideal, not an act of sex. Sex is something weak and irrelavent to what I want.

Now enter the real world and change of the Internet from my sheltered life around 2003. Something was wrong. I had a mental disorder, I didn't feel whole, I felt like I was constantly being abused for my principles and goals in life, I lost all trust for humans as I see the worst in them. I had to stop and view OCD for what it is, something irrational and fleeting. I had to see things in the third person. I had to rip apart my personality, subject myself to things I didn't find fun at all, and otherwise give myself cognitive behavior therapy.

OCD itself is background noise and anxiety. It is an obsession that compels the sufferer. It feels very much like INTP in its purity.

I still believe in my INFP principles, but I've forgotton how good it feels to show them until recently. Normally I let my jaded personality go into analyze mode. When I've finally made up my mind, I normally exhibit high pretencious beliefs and remain unwaivering. It's either me or them, and I choose me. Emotions have been hurt too much in the past, so I normally try to shut them off with CBT.

By and large, I'll always have an obsessive INTP in the background. It kicks in the minute I have something I want to research. Most tests online say I'm an INTP, but I'm unlike most INTPs and act more like an INFP.

I am sort of an IXXX personality trait. Most of the tests show me split very close down the center. Anymore I'm on a quest to become whole, regardless of my personality type. Really, the only thing I need to learn is to be an extrovert. Something, I have never looked forward to and refuse to do.

 

[loveofreason]

This cannot be easily answered in my current style of speaking (DAMN YOU!), so a more down to earth and technical approach is required.

You're welcome

My base is an INFP, I've been that since a kid. I believe highly in chivalry, treating people with respect, avoiding eye contact, being warm and compassionate to other humans, and otherwise giving them the benefit of the doubt. I believe I can reason with my enemy and make them my friend. Romance is the one thing I pursue to the highest. Romance is an ideal, not an act of sex. Sex is something weak and irrelavent to what I want.

Hmm, sounds familiar. From childhood I tried reasoning with those around me, and expected people to automatically respect my boundaries and emotional privacy. But the world is hard, irrational and hungry, no?

Now enter the real world and change of the Internet from my sheltered life around 2003. Something was wrong. I had a mental disorder, I didn't feel whole, I felt like I was constantly being abused for my principles and goals in life, I lost all trust for humans as I see the worst in them. I had to stop and view OCD for what it is, something irrational and fleeting. I had to see things in the third person. I had to rip apart my personality, subject myself to things I didn't find fun at all, and otherwise give myself cognitive behavior therapy.

OCD itself is background noise and anxiety. It is an obsession that compels the sufferer. It feels very much like INTP in its purity.

I still believe in my INFP principles, but I've forgotton how good it feels to show them until recently. Normally I let my jaded personality go into analyze mode. When I've finally made up my mind, I normally exhibit high pretencious beliefs and remain unwaivering. It's either me or them, and I choose me. Emotions have been hurt too much in the past, so I normally try to shut them off with CBT.

By and large, I'll always have an obsessive INTP in the background. It kicks in the minute I have something I want to research. Most tests online say I'm an INTP, but I'm unlike most INTPs and act more like an INFP.

I am sort of an IXXX personality trait. Most of the tests show me split very close down the center. Anymore I'm on a quest to become whole, regardless of my personality type. Really, the only thing I need to learn is to be an extrovert. Something, I have never looked forward to and refuse to do.

I suspect you're not alone in some of the courageous personal actions you have taken. We (humans) are capable of being the masters of our own minds; of achieving and maintaining personal sovereignity. And some of us are born assuming this, yet find the world is not ready to recognise us. Some of us forget this in our battle for psychological survival. Some of us give up. Sometimes we need to explore helplessness and varying degrees of assistance. Some of us take the long road. Some explore the wilderness. Some of us just need reminding.

Thanks for sharing.

 

[Wisp]

I don't know about you, but I tend to be as flexible as possible to ensure harmony with myself and others, however I WILL NOT cross those boundaries so others will be happy. I'm a very strong T type, but I have have an F side as well, which tends to manifest through specific activities (music). Some may read the desire for harmony as F-ness, but I think it's imprtant to maintain an effective personality. As for OCD, OCD is the INTP at his worst, no, worse than that, because a INTP is by nature at least flexible in his own way.

(No offense intended by using male pronouns)

 

[Ermine]

Yeah, same here. I'm pretty flexible and easy going, until someone crosses the line. Then I'm aggressively stubborn in enforcing whatever principle has been violated.

 

[Wisp]

That's the "true" J side coming out, due to the way the INTP works, what with P being external, J being internal...

 

[Zero]

I've tried the test on Similarminds a few times. Getting different INXX personalities. In the same day I tested INTP on the individual one, I got INFP/INTP/INTJ on the preference attraction and type one.

 

[Cabbo Pearimo]

Actualized type: [SIZE=+2]INTP[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you are)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 64% Extroverted (E) 36%
Intuitive (N) 52.38% Sensing (S) 47.62%
Thinking (T) 66.67% Feeling (F) 33.33%
Perceiving (P) 61.29% Judging (J) 38.71%

INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population. [SIZE=+0]​

[/SIZE]

*The current algorithm breaks the tie randomly so refresh the page to see alternate results​

Preferred type: [SIZE=+2]ENTP[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you prefer to be)[/SIZE]

Extroverted (E) 50% Introverted (I) 50%
Intuitive (N) 51.28% Sensing (S) 48.72%
Thinking (T) 60.53% Feeling (F) 39.47%
Perceiving (P) 71.43% Judging (J) 28.57%

ENTP - "Inventor". Enthusiastic interest in everything and always sensitive to possibilities. Non-conformist and innovative. 3.2% of the total population.
*The current algorithm breaks the tie randomly so refresh the page to see alternate results​

​

Attraction type: [SIZE=+2]INTP[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you are attracted to)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 56.41% Extroverted (E) 43.59%
Intuitive (N) 59.52% Sensing (S) 40.48%
Thinking (T) 61.54% Feeling (F) 38.46%
Perceiving (P) 69.7% Judging (J) 30.3%

INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population.
*The current algorithm breaks the tie randomly so refresh the page to see alternate results​

In other words I'm a stably introverted INTP who prefers INTPs. I love you guys.

 

[Wisp]

Good to be here... I'm INTP/INTP/INTP... I love us more!

 

[Cabbo Pearimo]

Well, technically I'm INTP E/INTP INTP because the ENTP/INTP divide on the second bit was 50%

 

[Jimbo2047]

I got this.

Actualized type: [SIZE=+2]ISTP[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you are)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 80% Extroverted (E) 20%
Sensing (S) 51.22% Intuitive (N) 48.78%
Thinking (T) 64.86% Feeling (F) 35.14%
Perceiving (P) 63.41% Judging (J) 36.59%
​

ISTP - "Engineer". Values freedom of action and following interests and impulses. Independent, concise in speech, master of tools. 5.4% of total population

Preferred type: [SIZE=+2]ISTP[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you prefer to be)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 71.88% Extroverted (E) 28.13%
Sensing (S) 53.49% Intuitive (N) 46.51%
Thinking (T) 62.86% Feeling (F) 37.14%
Perceiving (P) 65% Judging (J) 35%
​

ISTP - "Engineer". Values freedom of action and following interests and impulses. Independent, concise in speech, master of tools. 5.4% of total population.

Attraction type: [SIZE=+2]INTP[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you are attracted to)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 55.17% Extroverted (E) 44.83%
Intuitive (N) 57.89% Sensing (S) 42.11%
Thinking (T) 56.1% Feeling (F) 43.9%
Perceiving (P) 63.64% Judging (J) 36.36%
​

INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population.

 

[Cabbo Pearimo]

GET OUT!


Not really.


Still, do.


Nope.

 

[Wisp]

At least he likes us...

 

[Cabbo Pearimo]

Yippie.

 

[SlerdNut]

INTP/INTJ and (INFJ) but the F was on a random tie-breaker (F-T was 50-50). While I <3 NFs, it's better when they're borderline Ts.

 

[Shadow]

Jung Explorer Test

Actualized type: [SIZE=+2]INTP[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you are)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 67.65% Extroverted (E) 32.35%
Intuitive (N) 62.16% Sensing (S) 37.84%
Thinking (T) 51.52% Feeling (F) 48.48%
Perceiving (P) 88.46% Judging (J) 11.54%
​

INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population. ​

Preferred type: [SIZE=+2]INFP[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you prefer to be)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 54.84% Extroverted (E) 45.16%
Intuitive (N) 60.53% Sensing (S) 39.47%
Feeling (F) 51.28% Thinking (T) 48.72%
Perceiving (P) 77.78% Judging (J) 22.22%
​

INFP - "Questor". High capacity for caring. Emotional face to the world. High sense of honor derived from internal values. 4.4% of total population. ​

​

Attraction type: [SIZE=+2]ESTP[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you are attracted to)[/SIZE]

Extroverted (E) 52% Introverted (I) 48%
Sensing (S) 56.67% Intuitive (N) 43.33%
Thinking (T) 51.35% Feeling (F) 48.65%
Perceiving (P) 54.17% Judging (J) 45.83%
​

ESTP - "Promotor". Action! When present, things begin to happen. Fiercely competitive. Entrepreneur. Often uses shock effect to get attention. Negotiator par excellence. 4.3% of total population. ​

​

umm, im pretty noobish at this stuff, but i think its quite strange to be 88% percieving, is it?

 

[Linsejko]

Hey, I missed out on this one.

Actualized type: INTP
[SIZE=-1](who you are)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 63.64% Extroverted (E) 36.36%
Intuitive (N) 58.54% Sensing (S) 41.46%
Thinking (T) 53.85% Feeling (F) 46.15%
Perceiving (P) 62.16% Judging (J) 37.84%
​

INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population. ​

Preferred type: INFP
[SIZE=-1](who you prefer to be)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 63.33% Extroverted (E) 36.67%
Intuitive (N) 62.5% Sensing (S) 37.5%
Feeling (F) 53.49% Thinking (T) 46.51%
Perceiving (P) 54.55% Judging (J) 45.45%
​

INFP - "Questor". High capacity for caring. Emotional face to the world. High sense of honor derived from internal values. 4.4% of total population. ​

​

Attraction type: INFP
[SIZE=-1](who you are attracted to)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 63.16% Extroverted (E) 36.84%
Intuitive (N) 65.79% Sensing (S) 34.21%
Feeling (F) 52.94% Thinking (T) 47.06%
Perceiving (P) 61.54% Judging (J) 38.46%
​

INFP - "Questor".

Well that's pretty darn accurate. Notice in my attraction, the INP is all pretty definite, but the F is just enough to displace the T; that is exactly how I would have described my ideal woman.

Meanwhile, my personal results show some interesting things... I want to become an INXP, ideally, and the test reflects this pretty well. However, I feel my desired traits (as well as test error margin) reflected on my assumed actualized traits- on the Actual Myers-Briggs test, administered by a Ph.D who specialized in this test exactly, I was 95+% on everything but T, which was around 65-75% (don't remember which).

Not a bad test, though.

.L

 

[Dissident]

I got this:
Actualized type: INTP

Introverted (I) 83.87% Extroverted (E) 16.13% (Pretty big I)
Intuitive (N) 56.25% Sensing (S) 43.75%
Thinking (T) 61.11% Feeling (F) 38.89%
Perceiving (P) 88.46% Judging (J) 11.54%

Preferred type: INTP (Everything seems a little more balanced here)
Introverted (I) 76.92% Extroverted (E) 23.08%
Intuitive (N) 51.43% Sensing (S) 48.57%
Thinking (T) 59.46% Feeling (F) 40.54%
Perceiving (P) 68.97% Judging (J) 31.03%

Attraction type: INFP
Introverted (I) 59.38% Extroverted (E) 40.63%
Intuitive (N) 62.16% Sensing (S) 37.84%
Feeling (F) 51.11% Thinking (T) 48.89%
Perceiving (P) 67.74% Judging (J) 32.26%

I dont know how accurate is this though, i almost didnt finish the test, was too long with similar questions over and over.

 

[CowSavior]

I got INFP/ENTJ/ENTJ...

I didn't think it was very accurate...
I dont like judging people (My brother really annoys me sometimes because he is an INTJ), and I am not really a feeling person.
Maybe a little inwardly, but not at all outwardly.

I'm not really all that attracted to extroverts, either, but the NT part is perfect.
I'm highly attracted to intuitive thinkers.

I'd say I'm more attracted to INFP's than anything...
Actually, I think my girlfreind IS an INFP...

 

[QueenHera]

INTP/ISTJ/ENTJ for me.

now to make my partner take the test to see if he adds up.

hee hee hee.

 

[Oblivious]

Actualized type: [SIZE=+2]INTP[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1] (who you are)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 75% Extroverted (E) 25%
Intuitive (N) 58.54% Sensing (S) 41.46%
Thinking (T) 56.41% Feeling (F) 43.59%
Perceiving (P) 54.05% Judging (J) 45.95%

INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population. ​

Preferred type: [SIZE=+2]ISTJ[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you prefer to be)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 63.64% Extroverted (E) 36.36%
Sensing (S) 51.16% Intuitive (N) 48.84%
Thinking (T) 52.63% Feeling (F) 47.37%
Judging (J) 54.05% Perceiving (P) 45.95%

ISTJ - "Trustee". Decisiveness in practical affairs. Guardian of time- honored institutions. Dependable. 11.6% of total population. ​

Attraction type: [SIZE=+2]INTP[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you are attracted to)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 62.5% Extroverted (E) 37.5%
Intuitive (N) 60.53% Sensing (S) 39.47%
Thinking (T) 58.33% Feeling (F) 41.67%
Perceiving (P) 54.55% Judging (J) 45.45% ​

INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population.

I hope all this fence sitting has not perforated my colon.

 

[Aphasia]

I got INTJ/INTX/ENTP. Am I really that confident? I do know that I'm too lazy to take the test again, though.

@Oblivious: Get off quick if you don't want surgery and a rational fear of using the toilet.

 

[Wisp]

Eww... That could be messy... I feel like a psychological narcissist with my strong INTP/INTP/INTP score....

 

[BulimicMind]

Jung Explorer Test

Actualized type: [SIZE=+2]INTP[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you are)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 83.87% Extroverted (E) 16.13%
Intuitive (N) 67.74% Sensing (S) 32.26%
Thinking (T) 60.61% Feeling (F) 39.39%
Perceiving (P) 57.14% Judging (J) 42.86%
​

INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population. ​

Preferred type: [SIZE=+2]INTJ[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you prefer to be)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 61.11% Extroverted (E) 38.89%
Intuitive (N) 64.71% Sensing (S) 35.29%
Thinking (T) 53.85% Feeling (F) 46.15%
Judging (J) 53.33% Perceiving (P) 46.67%
​

INTJ - "Mastermind". Introverted intellectual with a preference for finding certainty. A builder of systems and the applier of theoretical models. 2.1% of total population. ​

​

Attraction type: [SIZE=+2]INTP[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](who you are attracted to)[/SIZE]

Introverted (I) 72.73% Extroverted (E) 27.27%
Intuitive (N) 71.88% Sensing (S) 28.13%
Thinking (T) 56.76% Feeling (F) 43.24%
Perceiving (P) 62.5% Judging (J) 37.5%
​

INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population.

Wow, apparently I'm pretty introverted. I just wish I was more sure of myself.
Now to find a real life version of The Breakfast Club's Allison...

 

[Wisp]

Haha, the Breakfast club... That was a good movie...

 

[Linsejko]

err.....

....?

o.O

.L

 

[Wisp]

I... take it you've never seen that movie.

 

[Olba]

Actualized type: INTP (who you are) Introverted (I) 71.43% Extroverted (E) 28.57% Intuitive (N) 60.53% Sensing (S) 39.47% Thinking (T) 87.5% Feeling (F) 12.5% Perceiving (P) 81.82% Judging (J) 18.18% Preferred type: INTP (who you prefer to be) Introverted (I) 73.33% Extroverted (E) 26.67% Intuitive (N) 51.28% Sensing (S) 48.72% Thinking (T) 86.96% Feeling (F) 13.04% Perceiving (P) 86.36% Judging (J) 13.64% Attraction type: INTP (who you are attracted to) Introverted (I) 62.5% Extroverted (E) 37.5% Intuitive (N) 61.9% Sensing (S) 38.1% Thinking (T) 73.08% Feeling (F) 26.92% Perceiving (P) 50% Judging (J) 50%

That is a nice INTP/INTP/INTP. What's more, all of the percentages are pretty close, with the greatest variation being in the P/J axis between attraction and the others. Also, you were briefly discussing INTPxESFJ relations, right? Well, my sister is an ESFJ. Most of the time she sees me as an intelligent and effortless person. Actually, it's quite funny, in a way. She's three years my senior, so she's already graduated. Well, in the past, I remember at least two instances where she asked me to write an essay or a review for her since she couldn't do it herself for one reason or another. Once she claimed she couldn't get any kind of an idea and the other time she was scared of her cover being blown. In the former, I wrote a fictional story of my sister spending a really strange day that started with her not being able to use her voice and in the latter, I wrote a review on the first Harry Potter book, since she had only seen the movie and was afraid that it could be too apparent. And what's more, both of the texts seem to have scored rather high grades from her teachers. And no, they weren't just rough outlines or mindmaps, I actually wrote the whole thing, word for word and she submit my work to her teachers. Well, not like I mind. Damn, again I jumped on the sidetracks.