YOLOisonlyprinciple
Active Member
- Local time
- Today 11:59 AM
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 322
1. So, if i am a free willed person, then my body moves the way i tell it to. My arm cannot have a seperate goals and ambitions different from me.
It cannot be that my arm has a "free will" to write while my body/me is exerting its "free will" to play games.
A sperm and an egg are both parts of your body, they were created by your body. Then when they unite an embryo and a baby forms which grows up to be a different human.
Now your child was a part of you, but now it does things which are different from what you want it to do. It has a different set of thoughts and actions.
How is that possible? If by definition a part of you cannot have a set of thoughts different from you because it will break the logic of free will and only chaos will remain.
Does this leads to the conclusion that the concept of free will might be wrong?
2. The fact that a part of you can evidently show a set of thoughts different from you suggests that every part of you may have be an independent sentient being. Your arm might have a set of "thoughts" which are different from the person who is typing, but HOWEVER the arm's thoughts and your thoughts result in the same physical activity.
The arm's thoughts might be very primitive/drastically different than the person typing, but both result in the end real-world action of typing
So, this results in my concept of "free thought" but not "free will". I believe everyone can think freely but they cant act freely. Our thoughts and actions are independent of each other and exist on seperate planes, but they however seem to correlate to each other.
This leads to the concept of sentience in not only your arm but also a rock, and also a part of a rock.
Your thoughts?
Note, if you feel that the mixing of the sperm and the egg leads to some magic which allows an exception which creates sentience. The fact that cloning is possible from a single individual makes that a moot argument
It cannot be that my arm has a "free will" to write while my body/me is exerting its "free will" to play games.
A sperm and an egg are both parts of your body, they were created by your body. Then when they unite an embryo and a baby forms which grows up to be a different human.
Now your child was a part of you, but now it does things which are different from what you want it to do. It has a different set of thoughts and actions.
How is that possible? If by definition a part of you cannot have a set of thoughts different from you because it will break the logic of free will and only chaos will remain.
Does this leads to the conclusion that the concept of free will might be wrong?
2. The fact that a part of you can evidently show a set of thoughts different from you suggests that every part of you may have be an independent sentient being. Your arm might have a set of "thoughts" which are different from the person who is typing, but HOWEVER the arm's thoughts and your thoughts result in the same physical activity.
The arm's thoughts might be very primitive/drastically different than the person typing, but both result in the end real-world action of typing
So, this results in my concept of "free thought" but not "free will". I believe everyone can think freely but they cant act freely. Our thoughts and actions are independent of each other and exist on seperate planes, but they however seem to correlate to each other.
This leads to the concept of sentience in not only your arm but also a rock, and also a part of a rock.
Your thoughts?
Note, if you feel that the mixing of the sperm and the egg leads to some magic which allows an exception which creates sentience. The fact that cloning is possible from a single individual makes that a moot argument