sushi
Prolific Member
- Local time
- Today 10:32 PM
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2013
- Messages
- 1,841
the scientific definition of weight comes from the attraction between an object and the earth. Meaning the attraction between two objects cause gravity and fall , which cause weight effect.
An object alone cannot have weight, it can only have mass. But this definition is newton era and past.
Einstein redefine gravity as curvature of spacetime, rather just attraction between two objects.
this could imply that an simgle object could inherently have weight if it sits on space time. (maybe some field cause it) It does not take two objects and its attraction to create wieght.
To be completely weightless (absolute 0 weight) imply true nothingness, which is impossible.
is there any flaw on that kind of reasoning?
An object alone cannot have weight, it can only have mass. But this definition is newton era and past.
Einstein redefine gravity as curvature of spacetime, rather just attraction between two objects.
this could imply that an simgle object could inherently have weight if it sits on space time. (maybe some field cause it) It does not take two objects and its attraction to create wieght.
To be completely weightless (absolute 0 weight) imply true nothingness, which is impossible.
is there any flaw on that kind of reasoning?