thank you everybody for the responses.
I may sound completely crazy too, but I will give you my rather out-there view upon this matter.
It sounds like you have hit a new level of consciousness. It is a blank page you may want to be open to and accept as part of your personal development. It makes sense to me as I have experienced a similar thing. I don't know if I am making any sense to you at all, either...... But I do understand. You are not crazy, just looking at yourself, or your
old self, from the outside. The person looking is the real you, stripped back to your essence.
Then I may be completely wrong. I don't know what you have been through, or anything about you. I can only read between the lines and this is my interpretation. I hope I didn't sound too pompous, but I probably did, argh........
don't worry, you make sense
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bf43/6bf43403f77fe449d3bb3e8da02a78b75110e755" alt=":) :) :)"
though, in case it wasn't clear, I have accepted it as part of my development. In an ideal world, I would be able to fully withdraw while I contemplate this and decide how I am going to proceed with my life. the procession is the decision of direction, essentially. of course until then, I'm going nowhere, which causes problems with others, which cause problems for me.
Inappropriate Behavior said:
Yes you are a little crazy. Join the club. It's membership stands at somewhere around 8 billion or so and we gain more than we lose every day. But that has nothing to do with what you said in your post.
So you are turning from a (???) into a nihilist? That would be a rather sane thing to do. So would turning into something else. Who you are, what you feel and what you believe are not meant to remain static. What you are now is not what you will be in the future unless of course you die now. What you are when you die is what you will be forever. Dead.
I guess this is my dickish way of saying relax, whatever you are/think now isn't going to last. Unfortunately that also applies for when you find yourself happy.
I suppose this raises another issue (maybe it's the same? it's more concrete though). if we already know the destination, and know it is absolute and unavoidable, then why does anything along the way matter? you don't need to answer, I'm just musing.
this made me smile (in the good way
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bf43/6bf43403f77fe449d3bb3e8da02a78b75110e755" alt=":) :) :)"
). You might be right that it shouldn't concern me what others think. maybe it's just how I am affected by what I think people think. I don't find this disturbing at all, but I think myself from a few months ago might, and I know my family definitely would, so I just assume that nobody should know. Maybe it's also because I shared this with one of my teachers, and their response wasn't exactly understanding.
anyways, I'm glad that others
have gone/are going through this too. I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't losing my mind or anything
Some good points. I think the main problem is the loss of inherent reason, so theres no more
reason to find reason. of course, i guess that can be taken two ways, to say that there is nothing stopping you from doing something percieved irrational? added with chasing your interests, I think I can see what you are getting at. but then looking at the other meaning of the phrase, which is saying that nothing could rationally be pursued (which follows with: and therefore shouldn't), allows the whole thing to collapse again
melody said:
I went through something like that three years ago... I questioned everything I was doing, and I found that it wasn't anything I could stand on. I could no longer defend what I was, and so I stopped trying. So I believed almost nothing for a while, questioning even the things that I had been so sure about before, and then started to build a foundation I could really stand on. I also had counseling for a while because after about a year of this, I did get depressed. But if you pull out of the questioning with answers, all the questioning is really worth it.
yeah, I figure as much.
loveofreason said:
Other People may be the only reason to leave the the state you describe. It does shift in its own course, but the 'desire' for it to shift (for me) only came from the fact that I indeed had folk whose well-being I was accountable for.
And desire is the wrong word, there is no desire for anything from within that nothingness. The needs of others were unwelcome rain on the windowpane, demanding focus; demanding commitment to a point of view. I couldn't actually be touched by those needs but was aware that, from the outside, I was answerable....
That from an external point of view certain actions/performances were required of me, even though they fundamentally meant nothing. I did worry at the time (and the eye of it lasted several months) that I would be forcibly hospitalised, which is an outcome worth moving to avoid if the long-term outcome for other people relies on one's 'freedom'.
Still... can the desire to "reach for the light" come from within? I'd like to have been there long enough to know that... to watch my own responses unfold, not just my reactions to the demands of the world.
Wait... maybe a desire for connection with others was close to it's own expression. I would have to dwell more deeply than I have time for now, in order to thoroughly recreate that time.
Basically, becoming reactive. I hope this doesn't sound offensive, but basically reverting to the naturalism of an animal. whether or not our minds
desire life, our bodies still do, so I guess nature is the basis that cannot be avoided? basic desires come from nature, while the more 'lofty' ones stem from another kind of nature, one more relative and tempestuous than the base. Sometimes I think sentience is a curse. we build our own natures, whose upkeep comes from our own minds. when the upkeep fails, we fall to the base, and those desires are the only ones left. though I guess if the upkeep can be maintained, then constructed nature can succeed. When it's sustained by others (along with yourself), perhaps it becomes easier. for some reason I view basic nature as 'true' and the synthetic as 'false'. maybe this is my real dilemna, because I want to find the nature that's on the same level as our synthetic ones, but that I can still call 'true'.
looking back, I don't think this relates much to what you were saying, but that's what I got out of it, somehow.