That was an interesting if long way of looking at things. I hope I can say more succinctly: I have noticed that a lot of human beings approach "life / action / judgment" through emotionalism and/or inertia. This is touched on at the end of the video, about the espouser of a world view feeling "it's too high an emotional price to pay" to be wrong about something in their lens.
I think inertia is worth mentioning as well though - the claim that because something was already done some way, it should continue to be done that way. This shows a failure of imagination. I have wondered if it's indicative of low creativity, a certain dullness in how one uses one's brain. Is a plodding obstreperous bureaucrat born dull and then seeks a job that fits how their brain works? Or does a person become dulled by the institutions surrounding them? Especially if they have no drive, reason, or stake to oppose such systems and just "go with the flow".
Emotionalism and inertia are the key factors of human behavior that I find myself considering, when trying to enlarge the reach of secular groups such as the Western North Carolina Humanists. Let's face it, the crowd I'm in is small, and likes to argue and debate about stuff in a rational manner. This kind of orientation clearly isn't interesting to many people in the general populace, and we don't have any inherent "entertainment factor" to offer the masses when we engage our peers this way. It works for us but we're clearly a minority. We don't have the easy social fabric of the churches, where everyone's hanging out in proximity to the cultural concept of "God". Hey, whatever you're doing, it's about God somehow. We don't have the feel-good stuff or what the Skeptics call "woo", the buoyancy of invisible friends holding your emotional hand. And so, we are faced with some puzzles regarding human needs, because by default, we fail to answer a lot of them.
I think the problem is surmountable, but trying to enlarge the reach of a secular organization, requires stepping outside the box of our default comforts. What does an atheist do in a secularist organization, who doesn't particularly believe in a God, but doesn't particularly care to discuss or argue about such a thing either?