• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Specific Examples of Cognitive Functions?

shrub77

Member
Local time
Today 11:26 PM
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
54
---
I'm trying to confirm my type(again) and it's becoming rather redundant and frustrating. When I read the profile of the INFJ it reminds of how I was when I was younger (ages 3-12, albeit some of the traits from the INTP profile also fit..). I know many of you mention to study the functions, but I really don't know what the functions mean from the descriptions

Can anyone post examples(personal or fictional) of the all the cognitive functions?
 

Architect

Professional INTP
Local time
Today 4:26 PM
Joined
Dec 25, 2010
Messages
6,691
---
There are developmental behaviors that kids display when young. In other words, using specific periods of behavior when you were young can be unreliable.
 

snafupants

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 5:26 PM
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
5,007
---
I'm trying to confirm my type(again) and it's becoming rather redundant and frustrating. When I read the profile of the INFJ it reminds of how I was when I was younger (ages 3-12, albeit some of the traits from the INTP profile also fit..). I know many of you mention to study the functions, but I really don't know what the functions mean from the descriptions

Can anyone post examples(personal or fictional) of the all the cognitive functions?

Post some videos of yourself on this forum.
 

shrub77

Member
Local time
Today 11:26 PM
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
54
---

shrub77

Member
Local time
Today 11:26 PM
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
54
---

shrub77

Member
Local time
Today 11:26 PM
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
54
---

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 6:26 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
No Specific Examples of Cognitive Functions?

Here is an except from something I am writing called, "Hierarchical Temperament Theory" which I may or may not post. It's meant to be foundational and accurate, but not very practical.

There are no examples. Examples can illustrate but you can't use them to deduce.

"Behavior can be divided up in various ways. -(Analysis is a subset of one of the six ways of understanding.)- Let's look at some, lifting generously from MBTI theory. I will use analysis and provide dichotomies.

1. self related vs outside world related. (i vs e)*
This assumes there is a dividing line between where the self ends and outside the self begins. What the self experiences internally is quite different from what one believes the outside world is like. (edit)
* One cannot focus on two things at once so one excludes the other.

2. reasoning vs evaluating. (T vs F)**
Reasoning refers to where we place things; evaluating to whether we want to place them.
** We can't place things and evaluate them at the same time. If we place things, it's too late to evaluate them. If we value something, we've already placed them.

3. generalizing vs specifying. (N vs S)***
Generalizing refers to combining abstractions from things; specifying to directly relating to things.
*** Can't be done simultaneously. Specifying refers to particulars; generalizing to multiples of particulars.

4. scanning/openness vs choosing/closure. (P vs J)****
Scanning refers to moving freely among things without qualification; choosing to selecting one thing excluding others.
**** Scanning means not stopping to choose; choosing means stopping.

There are any number of other dichotomies for behaving but more than 2x2x2x2 = 16 is unwieldy. One through four hopefully correspond highly to the sixteen MBTI temperaments."
 

snafupants

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 5:26 PM
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
5,007
---
Se: Referencing of external experience (present reality)
Si: Referencing of internal experience (past reality and internal sensations)
Ne: Referencing of external patterns (alternate reality of possibilities and conceptualizations)
Ni: Referencing of internal patterns (future reality foreseen by implications)
Te: Decides based on technical validity from external standard
Ti: Decides based on technical validity from internal standard
Fe: Decides based on humane value from external standard
Fi: Decides based on humane value from internal standard

Ne: There are always other perspectives and new meanings to discover
Ni: There is always a future to realize and a significance to be revealed.



http://www.erictb.info/temperament2.html
 
Top Bottom