Socionics test.

[QuickTwist]

Test: http://www.sociotype.com/tests/

Result: http://www.sociotype.com/tests/result/est/100541

[Edit] Can someone explain this shit. I took a look at the bottom where all the function stuff is and I can't figure out what it means.

 

[QuickTwist]

C'mon people, this is a really good test. Can't someone post their results/tell me what mine means/ridicule me for being dumb?

 

[nanook]

Your Sociotype: EII-2Ne (INFj)

1. LII (INTj): 85% as likely as EII.
2. IEI (INFp): 61% as likely as EII.
3. IEE (ENFp): 59% as likely as EII.

details : http://www.sociotype.com/tests/result/est/100755

I don't really know how to interpret the percentages that are listed there.


Relative Strength
Fi Ne Ti Se 31% 44% 19% 6% Leading Creative Role Vulnerable
Te Si Fe Ni 19% 6% 31% 44% Suggestive Mobilizing Ignoring Demonstrative
Relative Value:
Fi Ne Ti Se 31% 44% 19% 6%
Te Si Fe Ni 31% 44% 19% 6%

didn't like some of those questions. perhaps i'll comment on them later.
didn't make a lot of friends in the foto section either. forever alone.

 

[QuickTwist]

You just need a little more enneagram 4w3 in ya..

 

[TheManBeyond]

Your Sociotype: EII-0 (INFj)

Other Possible Types

IEE (ENFp): 85% as likely as EII.
ESI (ISFj): 57% as likely as EII.
LII (INTj): 56% as likely as EII.

 

[TheManBeyond]

Does anyone know what does that 0 next to EII means?
@nanook, that photo section sucked so much, i didn't like anyone. almost.

 

[QuickTwist]

0 means you are weak sauce in the N department.

 

[TheManBeyond]

0 means you are weak sauce in the N department.

source?

 

[QuickTwist]

I forgot...

 

[EyeSeeCold]

If I recall correctly:
0 = no subtype distinction, or balanced type
1 = Base subtype (e.g. EII-Fi)
2 = Creative subtype (e.g. EII-Ne)

I didn't like the photo section either, seems premature.

I recommend these tests:
http://sociotest.narod.ru/info.htm (google translate link)
http://www.socionictest.net/Test.aspx
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/83597775/Brilliand-hugotest-77c7c100fce6/ptest_intro2.htm

 

[QuickTwist]

Thanks Eyes,

I took the second one, got:

ESTJ(Stirlitz) - 210
ENFP(Huxley) - 210
ENTP(Don Quixote) - 200

ESFJ(Hugo) - 200
ENFJ(Hamlet) - 185
ESFP(Napoleon) - 185
ENTJ(Jack London) - 175
INTP(Balzac) - 175
ISFP(Dumas) - 175
INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 170
ISFJ(Dreiser) - 165
ISTP(Gabin) - 150
ESTP(Zhukov) - 150
INFP(Yesenin) - 140
INTJ(Robespierre) - 125
ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 100

Interesting.

 

[JansenDowel]

INTJ 87%
ENTJ 56%

Can anyone tell me what this means?

 

[nanook]

@JansenDowel

which test did you take, the one from the first post?
that was not your result, was it? the percentage is given for the next best results only.

see

my result: Your Sociotype: EII-2Ne (INFj) -

1. LII (INTj): 85% as likely as EII.

>INTJ 87%

it's spelled INTj, lower case J and means TiNe or upper case INTP.
socionics has different names for introverts, i can't be bothered to explain ...
but ENTj means ENTJ.

 

[QuickTwist]

E=same
I=opposite

I understand.

 

[computerhxr]

Quiz results #1:

Your Sociotype: ILI-1Te (INTp)

Other Possible Types

ILE (ENTp): 96% as likely as ILI.
SLI (ISTp): 92% as likely as ILI.
LII (INTj): 91% as likely as ILI.

details: http://www.sociotype.com/tests/result/est/100855

The descriptions are very accurate to my personality. A few things aren't very accurate but would have been accurate to my personality when I was a child.

"ILIs are often able to understand formal logical systems without difficulty. Nonetheless, most ILIs are often not interested in interpreting overly systematic or deterministic models of reality."

Pretty much sums up my view of rationality vs. irrational models of thought.

 

[computerhxr]

Quiz results #2:

ENTP(Don Quixote) - 245
INTJ(Robespierre) - 220
INTP(Balzac) - 220 (hehehe ball-sack )

ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 205
INFP(Yesenin) - 200
ESFP(Napoleon) - 195
ESTP(Zhukov) - 190
ENTJ(Jack London) - 180
ENFP(Huxley) - 180
ISFP(Dumas) - 175
ESFJ(Hugo) - 170
ISTP(Gabin) - 165
ESTJ(Stirlitz) - 165
INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 160
ENFJ(Hamlet) - 155
ISFJ(Dreiser) - 135

 

[computerhxr]

I'm curious to see how Architect scores on the test from the OP. Where are you at?

 

[QuickTwist]

I'm curious to see how Architect scores on the test from the OP. Where are you at?

I totally agree with your sentiment but he will never post his results of these tests... sadly.

 

[computerhxr]

I totally agree with your sentiment but he will never post his results of these tests... sadly.

I just thought this one was interesting and it expands on the MBTI a little bit. He posted the results of the nerd test so it's not unheard of.

Our personalities are conflicting and there is so much overlap. I'm curious to find out where the conflict comes from and figured that this may shed some light. The MBTI is a limited generalization of personality. Having more data is always better IMO, even if it's irrelevant or absurd.

Architect has one of the stronger personalities in the forum. He is true to himself which I respect. It's a rare quality and I want to have a better understanding of how he thinks.

I have a couple of friends who are the same way, but it was so much of a struggle to even get them to take the MBTI. Strong personalities are not a foreign concept to me, but I would like to understand more about them so that I could understand myself better.

I can't really think of anyone else in the forum who fits in this category. Can you?

 

[QuickTwist]

No worries mon, You found your nitch, no worries mon.