• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Seems to me the algorithm does not work on INTPs

ummidk

Active Member
Local time
Today 8:17 AM
Joined
May 4, 2011
Messages
375
---
This forum's activity suggests otherwise
 

Black Rose

An unbreakable bond
Local time
Today 7:17 AM
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
11,431
---
Location
with mama
algorithm models a person's views and categorizes them based on comparing them to others. it is limited ai but it is about predicting INTPs.
 

Black Rose

An unbreakable bond
Local time
Today 7:17 AM
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
11,431
---
Location
with mama
What is it about INTP that makes them unpredictable?

Each person has a signature unique to them. This is distanced from what others do.
 

Daddy

Making the Frogs Gay
Local time
Today 9:17 AM
Joined
Sep 1, 2019
Messages
462
---
What is it about INTP that makes them unpredictable?

Each person has a signature unique to them. This is distanced from what others do.

How would you model an outlier? Are they a model of their own? In theory, the more you deviate from accepted norms of thinking and being, the harder it is to compare and contrast with other things. Wouldn't this be a problem for AI? Would it make AI biased by not seeing people for what they are, but how they compare to everyone else?
 

Black Rose

An unbreakable bond
Local time
Today 7:17 AM
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
11,431
---
Location
with mama
What is it about INTP that makes them unpredictable?

Each person has a signature unique to them. This is distanced from what others do.

How would you model an outlier? Are they a model of their own? In theory, the more you deviate from accepted norms of thinking and being, the harder it is to compare and contrast with other things. Wouldn't this be a problem for AI? Would it make AI biased by not seeing people for what they are, but how they compare to everyone else?

If all INTP are outliers then the category INTP cannot even be registered in a model so models of other types become flaky as well.

IBM had an MBTI text detector. It looked for patterns in text. With enough data, it could give a detailed analysis.
 

scorpiomover

The little professor
Local time
Today 2:17 PM
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
3,383
---
Didn't Deep Thought already say the answer was 42?
 

ZenRaiden

One atom of me
Local time
Today 2:17 PM
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
5,262
---
Location
Between concrete walls
What is it about INTP that makes them unpredictable?

Each person has a signature unique to them. This is distanced from what others do.

How would you model an outlier? Are they a model of their own? In theory, the more you deviate from accepted norms of thinking and being, the harder it is to compare and contrast with other things. Wouldn't this be a problem for AI? Would it make AI biased by not seeing people for what they are, but how they compare to everyone else?

If all INTP are outliers then the category INTP cannot even be registered in a model so models of other types become flaky as well.

IBM had an MBTI text detector. It looked for patterns in text. With enough data, it could give a detailed analysis.
If you look at INTP profile you will see one thing stand out.

They are outliers. So you can clearly have an outlier category.

What is more interesting about INTPs is they are defined out of all types with the most vague adjectives. Ingenious being one of them, which is clearly anything, but outlier territory. Theoretical being another vague term, that has hardly anything to do with personality unless you are INTP. Logically consistent, and critical analytical which is synonymous with IQ and analytical thinking etc.
So INTP is precisely what you are saying should not exist.

IS there something I missed about INTPs? Layed back and lazy? Perhaps.
 

ZenRaiden

One atom of me
Local time
Today 2:17 PM
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
5,262
---
Location
Between concrete walls
Didn't Deep Thought already say the answer was 42?
Yes it did. It was right it is 42. Trouble is no one gave it coordinates about how to explain the answer.

It did the thinking and it gave the exact answer people wanted.
No one bothered to realise that the answer might not be understandable
No different from running a super computer and not bothering to give it interface with humans.

Too bad.
 

scorpiomover

The little professor
Local time
Today 2:17 PM
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
3,383
---
Didn't Deep Thought already say the answer was 42?
Yes it did. It was right it is 42. Trouble is no one gave it coordinates about how to explain the answer.

It did the thinking and it gave the exact answer people wanted.
No one bothered to realise that the answer might not be understandable
No different from running a super computer and not bothering to give it interface with humans.
How is that different from Google's AI?
 
Top Bottom