My values are kosmocentric but also based on how conductive any activity is to evolutionary progress, relative to where its environment/circumstance is, relative to this situation coming near to manifesting kosmocentric values.
Therefore my values are not my "own" values, unless we talk about values behind my own actions, because only those happen in my own enviroment, circumstances and time. The value of Abe Lincoln (and thus his values) would be greatly reduced if he were time-traveled to the future.
What the hell are cosmocentric values then? Describing how they come about and why they are named that way could be a long essay (see Ken Wilber for that). To make it short: take everything into account: Not only sentient beings, also the supposedly dead matter that enables life. And time, thus the evolution of it all. Perhaps you can intuitively see, why its called kosmic.
Values have to be relative to possible actions, otherwise they are insane redundant egoic thoughts and therefore not valuable.
For instance suggesting i should be holy and am unworthy because i sinn is simply insane, because it is not true that i should be different from how i can possibly be. A true value guides a choice that i can make, chosing between a worse or lesser sin for instance.
If the quality of how a job is interpreted is not a real variable to be discussed (must be an uncreative job easily replaced by a robot), then what options are to be judged/decided upon here? Not doing the job at all? Replacing all police work with electrician work? Replacing both with robots? I see, its all about robo-cops with chemical weapons.
