ElvenVeil
Active Member
I imagine that philosophy is something that many of you like to tinker with, so I wish to start a thread regarding this topic.
What I wish to talk about (discuss maybe even(!)) is the legitimacy of philosophy as a tool for understanding. Where can philosophy be used, and what do you believe its limits to be?
I looked at these questions some years back myself, and my conclusions were that it seems philosophy to be relevant in two directions.
1) for introspective discoveries, as it can bring about a feeling of understanding of oneself. However the body and mind is not seperate but one a result of the other, and so an understanding of oneself must also be an understanding of the needs of the body (eating healthy etc)
2) within science. I do not believe that the actual workings of the world is found through sitting around and think, but through research and data. However the interpretation of data, and further back, the manner of how we collect our data (within some sciences) philosophy becomes much more interesting. This is naturally named philosophy of science, and so here, philosophy brings about consideration of what we do, but it, just like for underestanding of oneself (though to a much larger degree here) is not a sufficient tool in itself, if we wish to understand how things work.
Edit: I might have put this in the wrong sub forum
What I wish to talk about (discuss maybe even(!)) is the legitimacy of philosophy as a tool for understanding. Where can philosophy be used, and what do you believe its limits to be?
I looked at these questions some years back myself, and my conclusions were that it seems philosophy to be relevant in two directions.
1) for introspective discoveries, as it can bring about a feeling of understanding of oneself. However the body and mind is not seperate but one a result of the other, and so an understanding of oneself must also be an understanding of the needs of the body (eating healthy etc)
2) within science. I do not believe that the actual workings of the world is found through sitting around and think, but through research and data. However the interpretation of data, and further back, the manner of how we collect our data (within some sciences) philosophy becomes much more interesting. This is naturally named philosophy of science, and so here, philosophy brings about consideration of what we do, but it, just like for underestanding of oneself (though to a much larger degree here) is not a sufficient tool in itself, if we wish to understand how things work.
Edit: I might have put this in the wrong sub forum