Ex-User (5841)
Banned
- Local time
- Today 9:50 PM
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2012
- Messages
- 5,022
After a recent bout of psychological testing (first time ever), I'm curious about some things and comfortable enough sharing this stuff. Mostly because it's cool... and because I enjoy being my own lab rat data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82880/828807233588ced49b45f83304c2fe508f861712" alt=":D :D :D"
I'm not sure which tests correlate to which results for all the tests, but I connected the dots on a few.
My curiosity centers around the following: This led to diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder- bipolar type, PTSD, and ADHD. Can anyone clear the fog as to which tests and results likely led to which diagnoses? Some numbers regarding attention are superior while others are borderline impaired (or fully impaired, like the Faux Pas Recognition Test
).
Something that strikes me is that I was diagnosed with ADHD, yet the psychologist explicitly states in the summary that he does not recommend the use of stimulant medication. I assume this is because of the schizoaffective diagnosis (or specifically, the CCPT-2), but it raises the question of uh... how exactly is the ADHD treated?
Nonstimulant Strattera comes to mind, but does use of Strattera, or even a diagnosis of ADHD even fit with the testing results? I initially pursued therapy because of issues with attention, depression, and anxiety; and I'm walking out with quite a bit more than that data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f21f/3f21f2ee7efe27011db7a38ed3a53a56fdd0c5de" alt="Slash New :slashnew: :slashnew:"
My general approach to this whole mess is to avoid labeling myself as X/Y/Z, since a lot of this conflicts (e.g. the characteristics of ENTP vs schizoaffective- bipolar type) and I do believe and acknowledge that there are some positive aspects to all of these newfound labels of mine. Someone once recommended that I view this as a gift as opposed to a disorder, which I'm inclined to agree with.
Some members who I respect and believe can provide some input into this matter (although others are clearly free to chime in):
@snafupants
@Da Blob
@snowqueen
It's all up for grabs. Ask me/comment on anything.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82880/828807233588ced49b45f83304c2fe508f861712" alt=":D :D :D"
I'm not sure which tests correlate to which results for all the tests, but I connected the dots on a few.
Tests taken: WAIS III (Vocabulary, Digit Span, Letter Number Sequencing, Matrix Reasoning), Wechsler Memory Scale III (Spatial Span), Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Reitan Trail Making Test, Wisconsin Card Sort Test, Stroop Color Word Test, Iowa Gambling Task, Reading The Mind In The Eyes Test, Faux Pas Recognition Test, California Verbal Learning Test-2, Grooved Pegboard Test, Conners' Continuous Performance Test 2, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, MMPI-2, Dissociative Experiences Scale.
The results, presented as they are in the paragraphs of the report. Percentiles in (parentheses):
Right-hand lateral dominance
Literal fluency: average (52nd)
Category fluency: superior (94th)
Grooved Pegboard Test Dominant hand dexterity: low-average (16th)
Grooved Pegboard Test Nondominant hand dexterity: borderline (5th)
Expressive vocabulary: high average (84th)
Spatial reasoning independent of motor speed: superior (94th)
Nonverbal concept formation: high average (82nd)
Reading The Mind In The Eyes Test: low average (16th)
Faux Pas Recognition Test: impaired
Auditory attention span: superior (95th)
Visual attention span: low average (19th)
Reitan Trail Making Test Visual scanning: very superior (99.9th)
Auditory working memory: superior (95th)
Ability to maintain and alternate between two mental sequences: superior (92nd)
Conners' Continuous Performance Test 2 (Test of sustained attention):
Reaction speed: (99.5th)
Variability: (97th)
Impulsivity: (99.9th)
Reaction time did not slow (6th) or become more variable (24th) over the course of the test.
Response times became more variable (92nd) as the duration between stimulus presentations increased.
Number of omission errors: average (50th)
Number of commission errors: significant (95th)
Divided attention: borderline (8th)
Focused attention: above average (82nd)
Iowa Gambling Task: Normal ability to assess long term implications of decisions (68%)
Wisconsin Card Sort Test: did not display problem solving perseveration (53rd) and did not display difficulty with maintenence of response sets.
Learning of word lists: superior (92nd)
Immediate recall: average (50th)
Delayed recall: high average (82nd)
Rate of learning after 30 minute delay: very superior (99th)
Use of semantic learning and recall strategies: very superior (99th)
Did not display retroactive interference
MMPI-2 & Dissociative Experiences Scale: Endorsed dissociative experiences at a frequency similar to patients with PTSD, unusual beliefs, unusual perceptual experiences, anxiety, and depression.
The results, presented as they are in the paragraphs of the report. Percentiles in (parentheses):
Right-hand lateral dominance
Literal fluency: average (52nd)
Category fluency: superior (94th)
Grooved Pegboard Test Dominant hand dexterity: low-average (16th)
Grooved Pegboard Test Nondominant hand dexterity: borderline (5th)
Expressive vocabulary: high average (84th)
Spatial reasoning independent of motor speed: superior (94th)
Nonverbal concept formation: high average (82nd)
Reading The Mind In The Eyes Test: low average (16th)
Faux Pas Recognition Test: impaired
Auditory attention span: superior (95th)
Visual attention span: low average (19th)
Reitan Trail Making Test Visual scanning: very superior (99.9th)
Auditory working memory: superior (95th)
Ability to maintain and alternate between two mental sequences: superior (92nd)
Conners' Continuous Performance Test 2 (Test of sustained attention):
Reaction speed: (99.5th)
Variability: (97th)
Impulsivity: (99.9th)
Reaction time did not slow (6th) or become more variable (24th) over the course of the test.
Response times became more variable (92nd) as the duration between stimulus presentations increased.
Number of omission errors: average (50th)
Number of commission errors: significant (95th)
Divided attention: borderline (8th)
Focused attention: above average (82nd)
Iowa Gambling Task: Normal ability to assess long term implications of decisions (68%)
Wisconsin Card Sort Test: did not display problem solving perseveration (53rd) and did not display difficulty with maintenence of response sets.
Learning of word lists: superior (92nd)
Immediate recall: average (50th)
Delayed recall: high average (82nd)
Rate of learning after 30 minute delay: very superior (99th)
Use of semantic learning and recall strategies: very superior (99th)
Did not display retroactive interference
MMPI-2 & Dissociative Experiences Scale: Endorsed dissociative experiences at a frequency similar to patients with PTSD, unusual beliefs, unusual perceptual experiences, anxiety, and depression.
My curiosity centers around the following: This led to diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder- bipolar type, PTSD, and ADHD. Can anyone clear the fog as to which tests and results likely led to which diagnoses? Some numbers regarding attention are superior while others are borderline impaired (or fully impaired, like the Faux Pas Recognition Test
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c295f/c295fc174d8a656f9bfd0be0b0a1a9ed6c230de9" alt="Rolleyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:"
Something that strikes me is that I was diagnosed with ADHD, yet the psychologist explicitly states in the summary that he does not recommend the use of stimulant medication. I assume this is because of the schizoaffective diagnosis (or specifically, the CCPT-2), but it raises the question of uh... how exactly is the ADHD treated?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dc5c/3dc5c4ffbe4ca8e5e0f4c3e25668c26f96e55480" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f21f/3f21f2ee7efe27011db7a38ed3a53a56fdd0c5de" alt="Slash New :slashnew: :slashnew:"
My general approach to this whole mess is to avoid labeling myself as X/Y/Z, since a lot of this conflicts (e.g. the characteristics of ENTP vs schizoaffective- bipolar type) and I do believe and acknowledge that there are some positive aspects to all of these newfound labels of mine. Someone once recommended that I view this as a gift as opposed to a disorder, which I'm inclined to agree with.
Some members who I respect and believe can provide some input into this matter (although others are clearly free to chime in):
@snafupants
@Da Blob
@snowqueen
It's all up for grabs. Ask me/comment on anything.