BurnedOut
Your friendly neighborhood asshole
Are people stronger than they realize or are they a product of circumstances? I think that even if resilience is an inheritable character trait, it does not make up for the fact that coincidences play a greater role in shaping one's mind.
People cannot be expected to be resilient from the very beginning but due to heuristic of spotting patterns, people end up attributing positive personality traits to somebody simply because they have been more successful in their lives. If lives are so heavily dependent on one's character, how is that many people end up changing as time passes?
I know a person who lacks upper limbs due to a childhood mishap which got them electrocuted. Despite all that, the man is more optimistic than Usain Bolt despite lacking his arms. His childhood was consisted of very supportive people throughout his school life and social life. I feel that if that person was discriminated and mistreated, he would have emerged with low self-esteem instead of ending up working for the UN and then for the Indian Government as a policy consultant. Sadly, saying this would be taboo. I might potentially be excommunicated by him. However, does it change the fact that he was as resilient as he is portrayed to be?
The real question is this - as human beings, how many decisions that we end up making turn out the way we intend them to? Or do our expectations change as time passes too? These are poignant questions that psychology is not answering. Even if therapy does not innately assume that character resilience actually matters, I, after speaking to my former therapists, realized that therapists themselves have this false notion of a patient's progress dependent on her levels of emotional resilience. They tend to either 'adult' towards the patients if they feel that the patients are self-aware enough to accept criticism or 'parent' towards the patients if they feel that the patient tends to cower behind their backs. This is morally incorrect because the actions of the therapist and the reaction of the patient set up a self-fulfilling prophecy that seconds the patient's lack of courage to face her demons and the patient's thought that she is useless and therapy won't work on her.
It is very easy to attribute the future to one person by the way they present themselves. We are all guilty of this but we should try to understand from various real-life experiments and history itself that circumstances determine the character of a person much more than the person themselves. That being said, there are no 'masters' and there are no 'slaves' psychologically but politically it is convenient. This has got nothing to do with Capitalism because capitalism is rather pragmatic in this regard: Lift yourself up and become rich. And that is morally correct. It is not thought of as morally correct because Capitalism implies stepping over people's necks to achieve the goal but I don't think that there are any implications as such that can be derived from Capitalism.
This should make us rethink our thoughts about others. Is it okay to judge their characters or is it not? I cannot comment on that but what I can say is my life experience has taught me many things are simply out of our hands and the march of time writes your life's melody more than you. Your decisions matter a lot but your decisions if aligned with time will make you happy and if they are not, will fuck you and there is nothing you can do to stop that.
People cannot be expected to be resilient from the very beginning but due to heuristic of spotting patterns, people end up attributing positive personality traits to somebody simply because they have been more successful in their lives. If lives are so heavily dependent on one's character, how is that many people end up changing as time passes?
I know a person who lacks upper limbs due to a childhood mishap which got them electrocuted. Despite all that, the man is more optimistic than Usain Bolt despite lacking his arms. His childhood was consisted of very supportive people throughout his school life and social life. I feel that if that person was discriminated and mistreated, he would have emerged with low self-esteem instead of ending up working for the UN and then for the Indian Government as a policy consultant. Sadly, saying this would be taboo. I might potentially be excommunicated by him. However, does it change the fact that he was as resilient as he is portrayed to be?
The real question is this - as human beings, how many decisions that we end up making turn out the way we intend them to? Or do our expectations change as time passes too? These are poignant questions that psychology is not answering. Even if therapy does not innately assume that character resilience actually matters, I, after speaking to my former therapists, realized that therapists themselves have this false notion of a patient's progress dependent on her levels of emotional resilience. They tend to either 'adult' towards the patients if they feel that the patients are self-aware enough to accept criticism or 'parent' towards the patients if they feel that the patient tends to cower behind their backs. This is morally incorrect because the actions of the therapist and the reaction of the patient set up a self-fulfilling prophecy that seconds the patient's lack of courage to face her demons and the patient's thought that she is useless and therapy won't work on her.
It is very easy to attribute the future to one person by the way they present themselves. We are all guilty of this but we should try to understand from various real-life experiments and history itself that circumstances determine the character of a person much more than the person themselves. That being said, there are no 'masters' and there are no 'slaves' psychologically but politically it is convenient. This has got nothing to do with Capitalism because capitalism is rather pragmatic in this regard: Lift yourself up and become rich. And that is morally correct. It is not thought of as morally correct because Capitalism implies stepping over people's necks to achieve the goal but I don't think that there are any implications as such that can be derived from Capitalism.
This should make us rethink our thoughts about others. Is it okay to judge their characters or is it not? I cannot comment on that but what I can say is my life experience has taught me many things are simply out of our hands and the march of time writes your life's melody more than you. Your decisions matter a lot but your decisions if aligned with time will make you happy and if they are not, will fuck you and there is nothing you can do to stop that.