Reluctantly
Resident disMember
- Local time
- Today 7:46 AM
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2010
- Messages
- 3,135
What would you say?
That's super vague. Do you mean which genres an INTP would like, or which genres encapsulate what INTP means? If the latter, I might say existentially somber Joy Division.![]()
I've noticed trends but it's not definitive. I think if some more dimensions were added, cultural environment, personal background, and age(and generation), there might be a stronger correlation.
And it wouldn't just be a question of 'which genres' but 'why' and 'how'. For example, the specific genres I listen to don't matter much when I have an eclectic music taste. And what might be considered unusual for younger generations today could have been the popular music several decades earlier.
INTP's don't listen to music, we just listen to our rhythms of our brainwaves.
I listen to sea shanties, epic music, songs that elicit fond memories of my past (e.g., "Gravity Hurts," by Cryoshell and "Caught Up In A Dream," by All Insane Kids because I liked Bionicle; the Redwall theme because I loved the Redwall series), and songs that inspire me to create my future (e.g., "Glorious Dawn," by Symphony of Science).
-Duxwing
I remember back in the early days of INTPCentral, the big musical stereotype was something along the lines of:
"If you don't love TOOL, you aren't an INTP".
I like Melodic-Metalcore and Post-Hardcore mostly for the complexities of rhythm coupled with a flowing sound and aggressive style that is very attractive to me. Typically I am drawn to music that is aggressive and has enough complexity to keep me listening to it so that I can get different things out of the music rather than always hearing the same rhythms over and over again. I like all kinds of music but my passion lies in the harder stuff.
INTP's, due to Si largely, have a melancholic streak and combined with Ti/Ne often prefer complex melancholic music such as by Rachmaninov, Chopin, or various modern composers.
Most modern pop is oriented to the more common types such as XSXX
Architect
This makes me doubt my current typing (INTJ)
Chopin is by far my favorite composer (specifically his Nocturnes), but I (think) I have none of the same primary functions as INTPs.
Obviously, there's more to it than that, but coupled with the ambiguity of my typing (facilitated by a certain habitat doctor), it leaves me pondering the extent of my J-ness.
In addition, I can't stand modern pop and enjoy similarly melancholic music, as you stated.
Interesting.
Could the complete reversal of functions cause a similar taste, or no?
You seem to know much more about the functions than I.
Your taste in music doesn't predict your type. Correlation is not causation. But correlation does exist for types. As I said INTP's often like complex, melancholic music, but whether you do or not will not tell you if you are one.
You need to compare the top two functions for INTP's and INTJ's
INTP - Ti & Ne
INTJ - Ni & Te
So, a nice differentiation, it would be harder if they were merely in a different order with respect to each other.
INTP's predominately think, and secondarily explore, and those explorations take place in the external world.
INTJ's primarily look at internal, personal possibilities, and importantly they do their thinking out loud, in a sense.
A giveaway between Ti and Te is how the person does with institutional settings. Te INTJ's tend to do well in academia and corporate environments, while the Ti INTP prefers to be off in the corner thinking about something useless like General Relativity.
I mean I got to know their personalities first, then found out about the music they listen to, which was somewhat similar. Some were before I discovered typology, and others were after(which includes more bias/assumptions).Do you mean you typed people and extrapolated trends from that? Or do you mean you applied the theory and interpreted trends? Both?
Why and how, that sounds good. I think that would make this interesting.
Noting a person's respective generation/age would be important because "what might be considered unusual for younger generations today could have been the popular music several decades earlier." Therefore, for the 60s/70s generation, liking Led Zeppelin, Jefferson Airplane, psychedelic rock, garage rock, surf rock etc doesn't mean much relative to someone born in the 90s/2000s who discovers and enjoys those kinds of music.I don't quite understand the generation thing, personally; I can find music from any generation that I like. I think sometimes people get too hung up on the stuff they don't like and assume that's representative of all the music of that generation. It's too bad. Maybe I'm biased, but I've found that the prominent music in any generation tends to be about popularity, rather than talent and creativity anyway. So it goes, I guess.
The difficult thing for me is that I don't think I have a preference, or tendency, for either. For me, it's all about setting. If I'm interested in a class, then I will focus intently on the professor, take minimal notes, and do well in the class. If I'm not interested in a class, then I will take a lot of notes (trying to keep myself interested) but inevitably end up missing most of what the professor says because I'm thinking about something else..
...
On a side note, I have attempted to type myself based on Jungian functions alone (ie looking strictly at functions and ordering them in succession). I invevitably come up with a grouping that is not possible in MBTI - say, Ni,Te,Fe,Si.
That's actually the Functional Stack for the INTJ![]()