AndyC
Hm?
- Local time
- Tomorrow 4:41 AM
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2015
- Messages
- 353
I'm not sure if it's just me, but my logic seems to be quite selective. I don't rationalize everything I see, most of the time I guess I'm either perceiving or thinking about something other than what I'm doing with minimum detail. When I talk, I normally avoid fallacy, but not too much more than most people I know. I find I just don't tend to use Ti all that much, or my conception of it is off. I have transitioned from an F-T, not sure how but I am confident that an F is far from what I am now. I'm alright with being logical about anything abstract, like mathematics or philosophy, I'll wreck anyone who crosses me here, and scientific stuff, although that all fits in the same realm. I'm not sure if this is to with S and N, because people who normally seem to apply Ti alot more than me are good with 'exterior' things, things that aren't abstract or internal. This could be Te, not sure. But I know who is probably an ENTP, and they seem to out-logic me, could be my own lack of effort, I don't know. I have a couple ideas for how or why this is so, but I'm just wondering if this is common.