redbaron
irony based lifeform
if you wanna discuss the validity of different typing methodologies that's fine. but do it without the personal insults
pmj you're appealing to an external system of typing that you've interpreted as having a measure of objectivity and reliability. pmj feels certainty because you have the support of an external 'authority' on typing
pizzabeak you're appealing to the superiority of an individual internalised interpretation of typology, which has an aspect of nuance and discernment of context (such as inter-type dynamics) that an external system can't control for. you feel certainty because your typing is consistent with your internal experiences.
~
if you want to debate the validity of your typing based on this conflict in approach to typology, or debate people's type based on why you think your approach is superior, then go ahead. cut out the insults though
pmj you're appealing to an external system of typing that you've interpreted as having a measure of objectivity and reliability. pmj feels certainty because you have the support of an external 'authority' on typing
pizzabeak you're appealing to the superiority of an individual internalised interpretation of typology, which has an aspect of nuance and discernment of context (such as inter-type dynamics) that an external system can't control for. you feel certainty because your typing is consistent with your internal experiences.
~
if you want to debate the validity of your typing based on this conflict in approach to typology, or debate people's type based on why you think your approach is superior, then go ahead. cut out the insults though