thinking that you know something about external reality because you have formed a theory that is coherent in it self and compatible with all of your other theories about reality is related to mediocre or low IQ.
syncing theory with all data available and correctly estimating the likely meaning and significance of unavailable data is one hell of a difficult computation, when it's about understanding human beings.
topics like typology can bring everyone to their limit and beyond that limit there is enough overlooked data, to possibly falsify anyone's theory.
i have been wrong about typology a lot, and i went as far as thinking about it in my dreams. not dreaming about it. altered state 'einstein type of thinking'. nondual symbolic holo-deck. and i have been on this case for years. and i have always dared to attempt to think the opposite of what i was thinking before, to work out mistakes in theory. i don't know what else to do. the next step would have been to test my data by interacting with reality more, but this is no option for me, i have too few clients (so called friends) who ask for my analysis. being obsessed does not mean being right.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45389/453893ce95739dbfc7cd2a11e0f430acd3302f4c" alt=":( :( :("