Beat Mango
Prolific Member
- Local time
- Tomorrow 6:41 AM
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Messages
- 1,499
lol. I wish I had an X in there somewhere, XNTP would be nice.
____________
Here's a rule of thumb, that I admit it difficult to follow at times. There are reasons why the four ordered functions are in the order they are for each type. If possible, I advise you to make the set you are given work to explain your behavior before adding in anomalous functions. That's not to say you can't develop functions uncommon to your type, but if its the first explanation for any deviant behavior, you're going to find it hard to claim any type as what you are.
That being said, I sometimes wonder whether type is as structured or relentless as I once believed. I still believe it to be the case, but there is room for doubt. If you DO believe it, then try to use it strictly or you won't be able to derive the benefits it offers.
Sometimes its more helpful to learn of a previously unknown motivation than to assign a behavior to something that makes good surface sense.
Aw hell, I'm an INTP. I think I was ovulating or something before when I decided I was an INFP, and then I was premenstrual when I was an INXP. Female hormones are screwy. You guys have no idea how much they mess with our personality. I suspect it's even screwier for T females, because we have no understanding of what's up, especially when you're a P as well so you never keep track of these sorts of things.
Lots o' un-needed information, I suppose, but that's why I'm here!![]()
^ I'd say that post has more merit than you think. I seem to experience the same kind of thing as an INTP female. Emotion levels and levels of analysis keep fluctuating for better or worse depending of the time of month. It's confusing.
Aw hell, I'm an INTP. I think I was ovulating or something before when I decided I was an INFP, and then I was premenstrual when I was an INXP. Female hormones are screwy. You guys have no idea how much they mess with our personality. I suspect it's even screwier for T females, because we have no understanding of what's up, especially when you're a P as well so you never keep track of these sorts of things.
Lots o' un-needed information, I suppose, but that's why I'm here!![]()
In my opinion, this is part of where Keirsey got it wrong. In my opinion, all NPs have more in common than NTs. But maybe that's just me.
Maybe that's because he sorted the types into the four groups, which already the ancient Greeks distinguished.
Maybe all NPs have more in common, but eventually, the way of thinking is more common amongst NTs.
Just a theory.
-dreadful tellers of jokes... smirking and laughing at some private thought...
-The INTP melancolic is typically drawn to wild polar expanses, to mountain ranges and all places on the edges of civilisation.
-INTPs are collectors..The interests of an INTP would be enough to occupy him for several lifetimes if that were possible.
-Photography is a classic interest of the INTP
-...always chooses to listen to music which suits his current emotional state, be it aggression, warmth, excitement, relaxation or whatever.
-They feel an unpleasant sense of disharmony whenever a music style clashes with their emotional state.
-If they need to say something unpleasant to someone close to them, they would prefer to avoid this task for fear of the disharmony that may result.
-INTPs never like doing something until they know they can do it
I'm a collector, not a hoarder. I hate having messes and shit I don't use. I also hate photographers (I have a weird thing about freelance/artistic photographers) and don't care for taking picture much.
My favorite animal in the zoo is the cheetah and I prefer museum over zoo and aquarium, though aquariums are pretty cool.
I like any place with a curious architecture.
Also I can't believe you read the whole thread...
I can relate, though I can't be an ENTP or ENFP to the extent that you describe. It just kicks in when I'm more energetic than usual or going beyond myself without really knowing what I'm doing. In my opinion, this is part of where Keirsey got it wrong. In my opinion, all NPs have more in common than NTs. But maybe that's just me.
A bit off topic, but this has always bugged me: Why NF and NT, but SP and SJ? I mean, as Keirsey describes it, there seems to be nice, clear divisions as is, but I wonder if it could not've been just as easily separated as NT, NF, ST, SF, or as Ermine's post suggests, NP, NJ, SP, SJ?
you are an INTJ!^Very informative post.
One question that has come to mind for me is: What is supposed to be the role of Fi for an INTP, and Ti for an INFP? Most descriptions only talk about the leading four functions. I, like many here, feel that my Fi is often as strong as my Ti, even though Fi is supposed to be a shadow function for us.
I have seen it described as our "devilish" function, although it was tough to grasp exactly what that means. It seems to me to mean that it's a function we are tempted to abuse or use too much. So perhaps some of us are just naughty INxPs? lol