Jungle
In the middle of the maze
- Local time
- Tomorrow 10:59 AM
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2014
- Messages
- 53
I played football (soccer) from age 7 to 17. From a purely fantastical perspective, I have always been curious to know how close to a professional level I would be able to go if I ever get back into it. Pure egotism. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a395f/a395fc1c39d62cf677e5e2ccfe96159e9dee34a8" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
This leads me to the question: do INTPs have the potential to excel at football?
Jonathan Niednagel has written a couple of books which apply MBTI to sports. I haven't read them, but my understanding is that he ranks ISTP and ESTP as the strongest athletic personalities, with INTP pretty much disregarded aside from Tennis.
I can see why you might assume that INTPs are absent-minded dreamers who would be useless in team sports. But let's unpack the INTP functional stack a little.
ADVANTAGES
Ti: Ability to formulate high-level strategic insights into the game (perhaps more of a coaching skill than a playing skill, but still useful for a player to have). Probably not useful or viable during the actual game.
Ne: Ability to intuitively read the game and see potential opportunities. The ability to be a playmaker by identifying patterns and exploiting them to your team's advantage. The ability to improvise.
Si: The ability to learn certain plays and techniques by repetition and draw on them at will.
Fe: Because it is our inferior function it should not be considered an asset, but I recently wrote in the thread about laziness that striving for Fe appears to be one of the most powerful motivating forces for INTPs. This could manifest in two ways: 1) trying to get in synch with your teammates, help them and earn their respect; 2) trying to impress the crowd in a professional match.
POSSIBLE DISADVANTAGES
No Te: Inability to command other players. This could be mitigated by playing in a position that does not require organising other people. Ideal positions would be left midfield, right midfield, left striker and right striker. More significantly, an inability to make a quick decision (e.g. should I pass or should I shoot?)
No Ni: Unable to directly read another player's intentions (but might be able to predict their actions by using Ne-Si on a cumulative basis).
No Se: A major disadvantage. Slower reaction times than players with Se. Not 'wired in' to the details of the game. Less likely to identify subtle changes in gameplay. However, it is possible Ne-Si could again be used to mitigate this to some extent (by building up a database of previous behaviour from particular players). Less natural ability to learn the fundamental skills of the game (no easy solution but could be overcome through willpower and Si discipline).
No Fi: Does not appear to be relevant.
Comparison of INTPs vs ISTPs/ESTPs:
The big question here is whether Se-Ni is more useful than Ne-Si. I would suggest that Se-Ni is generally more useful, but that a strong Ne-Si player could carve out a niche for themselves by having different skills to the STP players and proactively mitigating their weaknesses.
I used to play right midfield. I was pretty good at delivering intuitive through-balls that would put a team mate in a scoring position. I was also quite good at reading the flow of the game and positioning myself so that the ball would often appear to magically land at my feet off a goalmouth scramble. However, I was completely incapable of scoring (partly due to lack of skill and partly due to indecision). This drove my teammates nuts!
I was really bad in one-on-one situations, especially when the other player had the ball and I was trying to defend. I would desperately try to read their intentions (failed attempt at Ni), and more often than not they were like a cat playing with a mouse as they casually outplayed me. Fitness was also a major issue for me (due entirely to laziness). Once the games were up to the full 90 minutes I could barely last the match. I also found it difficult to stay mentally focused on the match for its entire duration.
Getting really fit would be relatively easy if I actually made an effort to establish a routine (Si). Likewise, it would not be so difficult to get better at particular skills - like shooting and beating your marker- on the practice field and then lock them in using Si. Perhaps the issue of mental focus could be mitigated by taking up meditation. The ability to make a decision quickly is the only weakness I cannot decide how to mitigate (oh, the irony). Perhaps Si is once again the answer - just learning the appropriate behaviour through trial and error over time.
Case Studies: Lionel Messi and Diego Maradona
These guys are considered by many to be two of the best footballers of all time due to their incredible creativity and versatility.
So is there any chance that these guys are actually INTPs who worked out how to mitigate their weaknesses and showcase their strengths?
@nanook - I noticed in another thread you have built up a system for typing people based on body language. Would you be able to have a look at these videos?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWnqlOceKZk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INdnOf_JSLU
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a395f/a395fc1c39d62cf677e5e2ccfe96159e9dee34a8" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
This leads me to the question: do INTPs have the potential to excel at football?
Jonathan Niednagel has written a couple of books which apply MBTI to sports. I haven't read them, but my understanding is that he ranks ISTP and ESTP as the strongest athletic personalities, with INTP pretty much disregarded aside from Tennis.
I can see why you might assume that INTPs are absent-minded dreamers who would be useless in team sports. But let's unpack the INTP functional stack a little.
ADVANTAGES
Ti: Ability to formulate high-level strategic insights into the game (perhaps more of a coaching skill than a playing skill, but still useful for a player to have). Probably not useful or viable during the actual game.
Ne: Ability to intuitively read the game and see potential opportunities. The ability to be a playmaker by identifying patterns and exploiting them to your team's advantage. The ability to improvise.
Si: The ability to learn certain plays and techniques by repetition and draw on them at will.
Fe: Because it is our inferior function it should not be considered an asset, but I recently wrote in the thread about laziness that striving for Fe appears to be one of the most powerful motivating forces for INTPs. This could manifest in two ways: 1) trying to get in synch with your teammates, help them and earn their respect; 2) trying to impress the crowd in a professional match.
POSSIBLE DISADVANTAGES
No Te: Inability to command other players. This could be mitigated by playing in a position that does not require organising other people. Ideal positions would be left midfield, right midfield, left striker and right striker. More significantly, an inability to make a quick decision (e.g. should I pass or should I shoot?)
No Ni: Unable to directly read another player's intentions (but might be able to predict their actions by using Ne-Si on a cumulative basis).
No Se: A major disadvantage. Slower reaction times than players with Se. Not 'wired in' to the details of the game. Less likely to identify subtle changes in gameplay. However, it is possible Ne-Si could again be used to mitigate this to some extent (by building up a database of previous behaviour from particular players). Less natural ability to learn the fundamental skills of the game (no easy solution but could be overcome through willpower and Si discipline).
No Fi: Does not appear to be relevant.
Comparison of INTPs vs ISTPs/ESTPs:
The big question here is whether Se-Ni is more useful than Ne-Si. I would suggest that Se-Ni is generally more useful, but that a strong Ne-Si player could carve out a niche for themselves by having different skills to the STP players and proactively mitigating their weaknesses.
I used to play right midfield. I was pretty good at delivering intuitive through-balls that would put a team mate in a scoring position. I was also quite good at reading the flow of the game and positioning myself so that the ball would often appear to magically land at my feet off a goalmouth scramble. However, I was completely incapable of scoring (partly due to lack of skill and partly due to indecision). This drove my teammates nuts!
I was really bad in one-on-one situations, especially when the other player had the ball and I was trying to defend. I would desperately try to read their intentions (failed attempt at Ni), and more often than not they were like a cat playing with a mouse as they casually outplayed me. Fitness was also a major issue for me (due entirely to laziness). Once the games were up to the full 90 minutes I could barely last the match. I also found it difficult to stay mentally focused on the match for its entire duration.
Getting really fit would be relatively easy if I actually made an effort to establish a routine (Si). Likewise, it would not be so difficult to get better at particular skills - like shooting and beating your marker- on the practice field and then lock them in using Si. Perhaps the issue of mental focus could be mitigated by taking up meditation. The ability to make a decision quickly is the only weakness I cannot decide how to mitigate (oh, the irony). Perhaps Si is once again the answer - just learning the appropriate behaviour through trial and error over time.
Case Studies: Lionel Messi and Diego Maradona
These guys are considered by many to be two of the best footballers of all time due to their incredible creativity and versatility.
Wikipedia on Maradona said:He was a strategist and a team player, as well as highly technical with the ball. He could manage himself effectively in limited spaces, and would attract defenders only to quickly dash out of the melee (as in the second 1986 goal against England),or give an assist to a free teammate.
Wikipedia on Maradona said:One of Maradona's trademark moves was dribbling full-speed on the right wing, and on reaching the opponent's goal line, delivering accurate passes to his teammates.
Wikipedia on Maradona said:Maradona was famous for his cunning and clever personality.Some critics view his controversial "Hand of God" goal as a very clever move, with one of the opposition players, Glenn Hoddle, admitting that Maradona had disguised it cunningly in flicking his head at the same time as palming the ball.
Wikipedia on Messi said:Messi often undertakes individual dribbling runs towards goal, in particular during counterattacks, usually starting from the halfway line, or the right side of the pitch, although he has also been described as a versatile team player, with good vision, known for his passing and his creative combinations.
Wikipedia on Messi said:He began as a forward or winger but has also played in a deeper role, in particular under Maradona, in more of an attacking midfield and playmaking role.
So is there any chance that these guys are actually INTPs who worked out how to mitigate their weaknesses and showcase their strengths?
@nanook - I noticed in another thread you have built up a system for typing people based on body language. Would you be able to have a look at these videos?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWnqlOceKZk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INdnOf_JSLU