Continuing on with the recent themes of meta-cognition and collaboration, I was thinking maybe it would be a good idea to share what we're good at. Please list your interests
Computers, theology, religions, mythology, good public policies, etymology, linguistics, physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology, ethics and morality, rationality, psychology, mental health, personality theories, and evolutionary theory, to name a few.
and some indication of your level of expertise.
43 years coding. 26 years professionally. Coded for Windows, *nix, microcontrollers, mid-range mainframes. Coded in Assember, Basic, Pascal, Visual Basic 6, VB.NET, C#, RPG/400, RPG ILE, CLI, DDE, Java, C/C++, HTML, CSS, PHP, SQL, DOS, and more.
4.5 years in a religious seminary, and learning by myself ever since. Read the entire Old Testament in the original Hebrew & Aramaic. Studied Classical Hebrew and Classical Aramaic extensively.
First book about science was at age 6. Knew the 5 basic theories of the Big Bang, basic nuclear fission and fusion, by age 7. Studied biology by 9. Doing my own psychological experiments at age 9. Continued to analyse things since then. Predicted that saturated fats were harmful 20 years before they were publicly declared to be harmful. Predicted that diabetes would be likely to show remission, 20 years before the evidence came out.
Have a BSc(Hons) in Maths.
Studied lots of religions, and lots of mythologies my whole life.
Studied MBTI & Jungian typology for 30 years. Done plenty of experiments.
Studied rationality and mental health for over 40 years.
Been having discussions about politics and reading up on that, for over 40 years.
Generally said to be excellent at anything theoretical and at problem-solving, by pretty much everyone I've met, IRL.
If you list yourself here, you're volunteering to be @ ed to weigh when your listed interest comes up.
OK with that.
But I tend to say things that are true, even when everyone else already says the opposite, and tend to have solid arguments to back me up. So expect that some people might not like what I say.
This does not an invitation to appeal to authority. Please don't anyone take from this that someone with credentials or experience should be deferred to without making their case.
I hate it when people "take my word for it", as they can sometimes come back later on and claim that I misled them and blame me for their mistakes in being too trusting of what I said.
So I prefer it when people check what I've said.