After having left this forum to experience others, I had to come back. In addition to a host of other forums (varying in quality), I ventured into the realm of INTJ's at the INTJ Forum (or INTJf as they call it). Without going into detail, I would have to say that the lack of cleverness, bland culture, horrid logic, ass-raping mods, INTJ stereotyping (they all think they are amazing) and wild assumptions killed it for me. I've NEVER had a post edited, deleted, nor have I every gotten into trouble with any mods/admins before. It seems as though they dislike anyone who does not follow the norm over there, and anytime someone is pointed out for being illogical then flames must be lit. I digress. I suppose their ego is about as bad as those of ISTJ's, but I recognize that all INTJ's must be that way. In fact, I'd say that INTJf is a terrible display of INTJness.
-
OK, it's on.
I'm back.
- Thread starter Spectrum
- Start date
Mary
ad nauseam
Pshh, not all INTJs are bad. One of my closest friends is an INTJ, interestingly enough.
Good to see you back!
Good to see you back!
ApostateAbe
Banned
My experience at INTJf so far has been OK. The problem could really be your own behavior and aggressive mentality. It is irrelevant when people are illogical. When people say illogical things, then the relevant thing to say is that the statements are illogical, not that the people themselves are illogical, which only provokes aggressive reaction.
Dimensional Transition
Bill Cosbor, conqueror of universes
I don't think the problem is mainly in INTJs or ISTJs or something, it's more that Js in general are pretty JUDGEMENTAL(woah) which annoys people who are more perceiving.
Like I said, I know there are awesome INTJ's out there. The best forum I've ever had the pleasure of visiting is chock full of them (along with a few INTP's and INFJ's).
@ApostateAbe: Perhaps you are right. It's best if I hardly return to INTJf if ever; there was a severe dearth of deep thought and empirical explanations. Not to mention jokes and sarcasm are deeply prohibited, and jumping to negative conclusions (due to emotionally-damaged Ni?) by some of the INTJ's seemed instinctively primal. Like I said, I'm not really sure that they represent the type well at all.
If representations were desired of course.
@ApostateAbe: Perhaps you are right. It's best if I hardly return to INTJf if ever; there was a severe dearth of deep thought and empirical explanations. Not to mention jokes and sarcasm are deeply prohibited, and jumping to negative conclusions (due to emotionally-damaged Ni?) by some of the INTJ's seemed instinctively primal. Like I said, I'm not really sure that they represent the type well at all.
If representations were desired of course.