@Cegorach
I am definitely more Ni then Si
A video that shows me being abstract.
I wouldn't call that video particularly abstract.
Though perhaps the fault is with my explanation and the ambiguity and vast limitations of language:
"Abstract: thought of apart from concrete realities, specific objects, or actual instances."
Your story is comprised of specific objects; candy bars, gummy bears, etc.
It is also set in an actual instance, so far as actual instances being things that have happened and/or been created as though they actually did happen and that being based on the Wizard of Oz, you're creating a tangible link between that and the actual instance of the Wizard of Oz, it being tangible as a story.
Though any fictional story does require some element of abstract thinking, particularly in how connections are made between fictional elements; what it appears to me like you're doing here is Abstract connections through the filter of Tangible thinking.
Even the fact that you keep linking me back towards past experiences or creations seems a little suspicious, though non-conclusive, in the favor of Si.
Now, to better demonstrate an Abstract orientation, I'm going to expand on my previous definition into how an Abstract oriented and a Tangible oriented perceive the same thing; this is meant to be used in conjunction with my earlier definition.
Abstract: The object of perception is stripped of context and details and the essential underlying idea is what is directly oriented towards.
Tangible: The object of perception is directly oriented towards in context and in details.
Abstract is "x + y = z"
Tangible is "Red + Blue = Purple"
------------
I'm going to quote you on a few things from this thread to show further why I suspect tangible orientation:
"Id have to say that I anticipate great changes in society because of technology and I want them to happen fast. Popular science is my favorite magazine. I like combining different ideas to make new applications in my mind. I see many possibilities for change in all areas of life and in thought."
Popular science can be enjoyed just as much by iNtuitives as Sensors, it's what they take from it that actually shows their type.
Though the fact that you even told me such a Tangible thing again causes me a lean towards said orientation.
"In real life I don't even try to type some one. Except maybe 5 times I tied to tell people about it. I told them I was not an expert but they should look into it anyway."
Recall how what this is a response to was of me explaining how MBTI was a perversion of theory and that it was not accurate, so to not bother with it.
Notice how when I was speaking of it, I identified what I was speaking about only for the central of idea of creating understanding of typology.
Now notice how your response orients towards tangible examples of things you did in real life situations?
What an abstract oriented individual would usually do, at least the majority of the time when under the influence of their dominant Abstract attitude, is counter my concept of MBTI being worthless with either a question as to what part of its central idea is flawed, acceptance that the central idea is flawed, or denial that the central idea is flawed.
When an Abstract oriented person mentions Tangible situations or real life happenings it's generally for the purpose of identifying the central point.
"It could be said that when some one is defenseless against bad values I tell them there perspective is valued by me even if I disagree with it."
This is a Tangible experience of something you do in an
actual instance that forms your worldview and values.
"They do not ask what happens in real life situations about you such as; How would you react if a waiter dropped food in your lap/floor.
I would help them clean it up and try to to them I wont complain to the manger about it."
Not only do you specifically point to the fact that you orient towards Tangible realities in how you want them to ask about real life situations, but you also explain what you would do in a real life situation despite the fact that it's not relevant to the underlying idea.
"By my understanding I need constant stimulation. I am not ADHD but I get bored if my mind is not occupied by external things, thats a reason I'm addicted to the internet. Waiting in lobby's frustrates the Hell out of me. I read books better when I'm at parties than at a quite library. When I was a child I had low self esteem because I wanted to be an inverter but no one in my family or school wanted to mentor me. My dad left my mom when I was 6 so a male figure was not there for me. I avoided people because I thought they did not care. Fe makes me feel good about myself so when I was unable to express it I got depressed. My personal problem have now almost been resolved. I am socializing more and I no longer feel frustrated if I not good at things that are impossible for me to reach mentally."
This is just Tangible example after Tangible example, there isn't much to say except that you're compromising the underlying idea in favor of the context and details.
It entirely points to Tangible orientation.
"Have you viewed many INTJ videos on youtube? Or are you basing your thoughts on other experiences you've had with INTJ's."
Generally if someone is trying to guess why another would do something, they'll first look to what their own motivations would be in that situation, unless of course they have some form of knowledge
(such as typology) that will tell them the other thinks in an entirely separate way.
The way in which you immediately assume that member's guess has been gleaned from either direct observation or experience tells me that this is the most common way in which you gather information.
However, Ni is quite apt at assessing probabilities, it does not need to have ever experienced something in order to assume what is most likely based simply on their perception of inherent probability.
------------
I'm actually pretty convinced that you're an ESFJ, nothing points to an Abstract worldview or overarching orientation.
@Cegorach
Try asking about Extroverted Perception. Anime might give an interesting answer(Ne), which would dull Introverted Perception and ultimately his functions for perception.
I think I'll allow Animekitty to believe as he wishes, whether that be ENFJ or ESFJ, as I will believe according to what I have observed.
My goal here was to identify the underlying principles of what type he was and I believe I have done so, who I convince isn't really important to me as the truth stands on its own, above opinion.
Though that would be a good suggestion should I decide continuance of this endeavor.
------------
Between Adymus claiming DesertSmeagle is an ENTJ in
this thread and Words making an effort in convincing me to further explicate my reasoning, I'll try to divulge this as briefly as possible.
And I would have to say ESP here, with far less room for doubt than I've had with Animekitty, mainly due to an apparent lesser development of DesertSmeagle's lower hierarchy functions.
He predominantly orients Tangibly in his communication, especially in pointing at how his real life situations are cause for that which makes him worth something.
A few examples:
Notice how the bolded leads into real world Tangible examples.
There should b.e like subtypes of each personality because everyone is really unique and has different experiences..like i might like completely different music than some people.
o ya and how do i make posts? i have alot to talk about since everyone judges me in real life.
well, i dnt particularly like fasion because i see it as a means of comforming to social pressures and garbage like that. but if u just like fasion to look good go for it. I dnt wear many brand names but i try to look good haha.
im in this same identity crisis but for a different reason..i have social anxiety disorder, which ill make a post about soon.. i go to school all day lookin like a weirdo quiet retard, but i get home and im completely different..im 100% introverted, which i dnt think is good..i rely dont know how id act in public or college without anxiety. but i know id be pretty awesome.
i think that McDonalds has the most delicious double cheesburgers in the universe..too bad its so bad for you. i need to lose some weight.
Seriously, I didn't even put much effort into that, just looked through maybe ten of his first few posts on the forum.
Now that demonstrates a Tangible Orientation, particularly an Extraverted Tangible Orientation in that it focuses externally
(and yes, focusing on your body is still external), near all of his attitudes demonstrate an in the moment, Tangible, experience focused mind that does not orient towards the underlying idea in the slightest.
There is no way that he's iNtuitive.
There is no way he is utilizing Ni in his higher hierarchy.
There is, however, the possibility that he could be either F or T, though I would lean towards an Internal Value orientation in how he seems to be more concerned with "being awesome" than with creating a strong underlying system in which he can reference to prove his
awesomeness, as would be the case with a Te Dominant.
ESFP seems to gather the most credence in terms of probability, though an ESTP who has become stuck in a Dominant Tertiary loop hardly seems that far out of the realm of possibility.
But I never asked you to sort threw anything. I am doing that myself with this thread. Its good that your still helping me though.
Could you ask a direct question 
