I'm going to take a bit of a leap of faith and suggest
EFP (Xe - Fi - Te - Xi)
'X' symbolizing an unknown variable.
Though I must point out that being
F does not equate to being irrational, emotional or polite and friendly; what it actually signifies is that your mind naturally orients itself towards Values, as opposed to Principles in the case of a
T.
Value orientation is a bias towards that which is of an affective regard that acts as a basis of conduct, theory or attitude.
Principle orientation is a bias towards fundamental perceived laws or rules that act as a basis of conduct, theory or attitude.
A function's directional orientation
(Extraversion or Introversion) denotes whether it orients itself Externally or Internally.
Fi directs itself Internally and, as such, orients itself as a separate entity from the values of others, it's most comfortable with deriving its values from its own perceptions and principles.
However, a fundamental misunderstanding of Fi is that it does not participate in any form of communion or is egocentric and selfish; obviously this is incorrect, as it is more than capable of attempting to understand other individual's own unique values and sympathize with them as they are.
Fe directs itself Externally and, as such, orients itself as part of a larger web of values; contrasting and evaluating other's values in an effort to assimilate, direct and control those most appropriate.
It is relevant to note that Fe doesn't have to be group-think, rather it's oriented towards a more objective pool of information due to its External Directional orientation.
As well, there is an exceptionally vast difference between a Perception
(Ne, Se, Ni, Si) Dominant and Perception Auxiliary, like the difference between a filter
(Perception Dominant) and an influence
(Perception Auxiliary).
However, if you actually are an Extraverted Perception Dominant as I suggested, then defining Ne and Se will be quite appropriate in forming a solid basis for understanding of your type.
Ne|Se: Indiscriminate perception of external, transient, inter-related Abstract|Tangible information.
It needs to be understood that this is Ne and Se in an isolated state; like any Perception function it is not used for Judgment and is entirely indiscriminate in its disposition.
However, functions toss ideas and problems back and forth like a scalding hot potato and permeate one another into an often indistinguishable state.
I would really delve into considering whether you're oriented towards Abstract Perception or Tangible Perception.
I find many Ss believe themselves to be Ns because they have misconstrued ideas about N equating intellect.
------------
Short Description of EFP:
In using your functions hierarchy as an EFP you'll very often find that you wish to keep your options open so you can learn through experiences as they happen, sorting through which of them you can see as valuable to your distinct situation in that particular moment and thriving in contrasts between what is right for this moment and the next.
You may be bothered by those who make attempts at setting down rules with a less ephemeral stance that make an attempt to identify rules of conduct that are longstanding, though depending on your level of function development you may see some value in this, particularly if they are not forced.
Those with strong worldviews are going to get under your skin in particular.
In all likely-hood you would have a 'live and let live' philosophy; each to their own fits you perfectly and ultimately you want to do what
you want to do, what feels most
right to
you in that moment.
Though should you value another enough you may temporarily allow your own values to be superseded in such a way that you've decided between their momentary happiness and your own and chosen that their happiness was of higher value to you.
Although if they subvert your values too often you may be forced to reevaluate your value of them and even possibly come to resent them, regardless you may feel like they don't value you as much as you value them.
The idea of taking from a pool of values may trouble you a little, only if you can see some Principle based reason as to why their values are logical for you and your life would you even consider integration, but given extreme circumstances you will derive values from your Te after it has adequately evaluated their Principle oriented worth.
------------
But honestly, I haven't paid much attention to your posts and am, as I said, taking a leap of faith based on ones that I do happen to recall.
Longevity and emphasis of observation from somebody who actually understands typology are going to give you an accurate assessment like no form of real-time typing will and anybody who gives you an instant evaluation, including myself in this case, should be taken with a grain of salt.
.
, maybe taking a swig from his coke and having a stretch midway through, but for the most part, 
So I am more concerned about the practical application of the MBTI that can be applied to how I act in a 5 question multiple choice format that is not a dichotomy.