Growing up I lived in both inner city and compete isolation. I answered on the top end of the poll, since I live in an inner suburb now and I guess I'm still, 'growing up'. I've lived in various small towns of less than 5,000 people, and also lived in a place where the nearest house was 15km away.
Growing up I lived in both inner city and compete isolation. I answered on the top end of the poll, since I live in an inner suburb now and I guess I'm still, 'growing up'. I've lived in various small towns of less than 5,000 people, and also lived in a place where the nearest house was 15km away.
Since you've lived in both, which one do you prefer? (I've only lived in the same city, so I'm genuinely curious)
I love having access to nature in isolated areas. It's great to have easy access hundreds of hiking/walking trails and be surrounded by numerous national parks. Downside is that rural areas generally breed pack mentality and repression - Puffy's post about sums it up, although it does depend what town you live in, in my experience they are quite culturally dead with the exception of tourist towns.
City is the opposite. A park just isn't the same as an isolated hiking trail. There's less wildlife to observe and enjoy. That said people in cities have less of the hive mind mentality generally, there's more places to see and access to a lot more culture.
Suburbs are hit and miss I find. A bad suburb is really awful. A good suburb is great.
Whenever I've lived in cities I'd often travel out to the countryside at weekends to get more of what you're describing here in complement to it, as I like hiking. Cities represent their own ecologies though, incredibly multi-layered and complex both in a sensory and structural sense. It's a very different kind of exploration, but rewarding in its own way.
Personally I just find small towns to be a limbo like no-mans land. Not quite a city to get the benefits of ^ or the variety of population density and not quite rural enough to get the benefits of privacy, closeness to nature, etc.
So far the scaled results factoring in expected population frequency are:It's interesting, we seem to be vastly over-represented.
I would think, Words, that the question would concern the city you stayed in the longest. It would have had the most impact on your development and growth in theory.
And I gotta tell you, while I like to live on the outskirts of the metro area (so i can get to countryside and forests pretty quickly), I love the metro area far more. Much more diversity, more things to experience, more access to things I might want. I felt very stifled in Small Town USA.
<3 I've lived in many different places/been raised in different sizes, but I put my main one up there. I'm all about them new experiences + diversity...and more people leads to that![]()