Had that problem with MRSA 30 years ago when we used antibiotics liberally to wipe out SA. Oddly enough, it was more prevalent in hospitals than in the people outside of them.
In what way? I mean hospitals are where sick people go and often where their conditions are diagnosed, like if I had a giant fucking disgusting welt on my leg that looks infected and only seems to be getting worse over time, and rather than immediately going to hospital I went to my general practitioner, I'm pretty sure he would either immediately send me to hospital, or take a biopsy and send it off for testing then immediately send me to hospital.
So if you think about it MRSA being more common in hospitals than outside of them actually makes a lot of sense, or are you saying people being
infected with MRSA was more common in hospitals? Because that's a very bold claim.
Was a big deal in the UK for several years. Sooooo many people went into hospital for something, caught MRSA, and died. Wasn't spreading outside of hospitals. Even knew someone whose dad died of it. It was like COVID, but for a decade.
I'm sorry that you aren't aware of the epidemics that have been happening.
If vaccines are used ubiquitously, so that the body is consistently living in an environment where natural immunity isn't necessary, using up precious energy to make natural immunity where it's clearly unnecessary, is going to be against your biological survival instinct.
No that's not how it works, the immune system can't get lulled into complacency or slack off, indeed if anything our hyper aggressive immune systems are the cause of many problems. Y'know those kids with clean freak parents who never let them get dirty and then they start developing all kinds of problems, that's because without invaders to fight off the hyper aggressive human immune system goes
looking for a fight and starts killing off symbiotic bacteria and even the body's own cells.
So yeah if we vaccinated people against
absolutely everything that could actually cause problems, humans are not only survivors we actually thrive on adversity (within reason) and without it we begin to literally self-destruct.
But a vaccine for a particular strain of virus isn't going to do that
The main argument for vaccination for COVID, is that despite that our immune systems are strong at protecting us against thousands of coronaviruses, and have plenty of viruses to fight that gives them plenty of adversity to thrive on, they're still lax against COVID-19 because they haven't had to deal with THAT type of coronavirus before.
and if you get COVID it could really fuck you up, so it's simply better to get vaccinated than not,
My concern is that attitude is how we got MRSA. People said that bacterial infections could really mess someone up, and antibiotics aren't going to kill anyone. So it's simply better to use antibiotics than not. People took that to heart, and used antibiotics all over the place like they were water, particularly in hospitals, and ignored any other reasonable measures that were old-fashioned and considered something only Boomers would do.
So quite clearly, humans made poor decisions regarding MRSA.
Also, humans seem to have made bad decisions regarding Thalidomide.
I'd like to see something that considers the pros and cons of something. A black-and-white argument that presents only one side, seems to be probably missing the other side of things.
Maybe if we had that back in the 1990s regarding MRSA, many people would still be alive.
and if you're still worried about your immune system turning on you go buy a meat pizza and leave it in the fridge for 3-4 days to acquire character.
That would be trying to ramp up people's fears until they make the decision you want them to, that is contrary to the views of their rational mind. I believe that's called "demagoguery".
I believe that demagoguery was something that Trump was accused of doing. Weren't you against Trump?
For instance, since we started reguarly eating sources of food that contain plenty of Vitamin C, the genes that control Vitamin C synthesis stopped being activated, and have become dormant.
Eehhh, yeah, but that's over hundreds if not thousands of generations of humans having plenty of access to Vitamin C in the fruit and vegetables we ate, and sure modern medicine in general is weakening the human gene pool but as I said we're talking hundreds if not thousands of generations.
For most of human history, the global population was stable, and the healthiest 10% of children survived to adulthood to reproduce and father the next generation.
Today, 99% of children survive to adulthood.
Imagine if you had a university in your country, that only accepts the top 10% of students. Now imagine that the government passes a law that says that the university must accept the top 99% of students. Do you expect that the level of intelligence and competency of the university's graduates will drop?
If they do drop, then by how much? 0.1%? 1%? 10%? More?
Transhumanism will make natural selection irrelevant long before vaccinations have a noticeable impact.
People were talking about transhumanism, flying cars, and spaceships that could travel to different galaxies, when I was a kid. Still not there yet.
Meanwhile, no-one was talking about having portable communicators that you could use to play games on, i.e. smartphones.
We're still waiting...