And In Five Minutes Flat
YouTube- And the band played waltzing matilda by the houghton weavers
I found it rather too depressing to share the links collected, but I guess --- like BP --- it's best to start again...
I tried to enclose a little oil leak ticker as a widget, but due to the restrictions of vBulletin, not even Ragnar could put html in php: for those who want to slide the rate of flow about to see how much so far is in the ocean black, go to
here.
First, a meditation:
The administration has solidly attempted to evade responsibility --- not for the explosion, which no-one blamed them for, although the fact that the MMS regulators and the oil industry had in some cases, touchingly, been little boys and little girls together from an early age, seems
lax; and inspires as much confidence as the average person now has in Mr. Cheney ( who was additionally one of those responsible for this remarkable coincidence ). Mr. Obama's uncertainty as to whether the woman in charge of the MMS had resigned or been pushed demonstrates his effortless hands-off approach to the whole crisis.
One of the major reasons why --- over six weeks --- Americans are not angry, is that they have not been told what to think. For the Right, this is an opportunity to blackguard the credulous and incompetent Obama, yet how can they go against the Oil Companies whom they love more than they love their very families, and against Private Enterprise, the greatest invention of Mankind ? For the Left, this is an opportunity to excoriate Capitalism and Anti-Environmentalism, yet this necessitates criticizing Obama, and giving comfort to those filthy, fucking, hate-filled, racist, moronic scum who have
doubts about him. And who probably live in Arizona.
So reactions are muted. The French would have probably held a national strike by now. The Left's main reaction has been to jeer at the simple-minded worrriers by asking what the hell they expect the president to do ? Generally including something such as: '
Do you expect that Obama should dive in a frog-suit a mile deep and fix the riser himself ?'
This also has been the attitude of the administration. From the start they have pointed out that they have no equipment or skills that would work, that only BP has, and that it is solely BP's responsibility to fix any leak.
This is absolute rubbish. As is well-known, when the dam burst BP executives were holding a party on the rig to celebrate 7 years good luck in running Deepwater Horizon without any accidents. The blast blew in a wall where the party was held.
Now, hypothetically suppose that
all of BP's experts died then --- as well as those men who did die --- and BP been unavailable to fix anything at all: are we to imagine that in such case the government would merely have sat and wept by the oily waters of Babylon, unable to do a single thing ? There are other oil companies, some in Houston, and those other companies ---
who have all been helping BP ---have equipment; maybe as far away as Norway or Alaska, yet transport from those places need not take the six weeks that have resulted in nothing, let alone until August --- or conceivably, with someone like the unspeakable Albert Speer in charge, equipment could be manufactured in an emergency fashion along the coast.
Which is the point of competence. However unadmirable, nearly any of the old brutes murdered at Nuremberg ---
except Goering --- could have taken charge and made a better job by now than Obama or Bush: without violence even.
And their foreign peers to some extent. Admittedly the soviets would have executed a dozen managers by now, and sent the relevant cabinet ministers to guard small holes in Siberia, but still fucked it up as badly as this administration; yet past efficient American presidents, such as Hoover or FDR, would have the thing under control by now. Even Carter, who after all had served as nuclear engineer in the Navy, would have done far better.
There are other forces, effectually abetting government inaction, who have not been silent: the ever-popular --- not to mention
populist --- internet libertarian tendency. Urging that disasters are best left it to private industry to fix --- which ignores the fact that in a world without regulation coercively imposed by government there may be no reason for an oil --- or any other --- company to do the faintest thing but walk away from any disaster they cause. What's in it for them ? ( Alternatively the libertarian might claim companies may be sued by private individuals, but who then owns the courts ? Not to mention that law that is breakable can
only be dictated by government, not by mutual agreement between citizens --- some of whom are thieves. )
Mr. Obama seems to have anticipated there would be no emergencies or sudden challenges under his watch. He hates surprises; and hates being expected to
do stuff. All he needed was be inaugurated in order to heal the world, then to just continue the Bush Legacy as planned; to be sure, as expected he followed that doctrine both in the wars he inherited and in economics, and has extended it mightily: not even Bush dared announce the new power Obama boldly enunciated recently, that as president he has the right to have any American abroad murdered without trial upon private decision that he or she is
Not A Nice Person. Then again, even Philip II of Spain, who had a lot of people murdered, never claimed this as a regal
right. He just did it.
Which is an excellent motto for anyone.
More links after the break.
Claverhouse
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16897/168973591eb22bf3853854f5e48de16cbcaaae0e" alt="Phear :phear: :phear:"