• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

For Linux Users: Gnome or KDE?

KDE vs Gnome?

  • KDE!

    Votes: 2 20.0%
  • Gnome

    Votes: 6 60.0%
  • No Preference, or other (please explain)

    Votes: 2 20.0%

  • Total voters
    10

lightspeed

Banned
Local time
Today 8:24 AM
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Messages
357
---
Location
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Which do you prefer? I've been running on Windows systems lately, because of my living situations. At first, I liked the KDE...but came to realize that gnome was really the way to go. Slower, it seemed, but more stable.

:phear:

Ken: Hello ladies and gentleman, and welcome to the Linux Magazine Arena in beautiful downtown San Francisco! We’re here for tonight’s main event; GNOME vs. KDE; The Final Smackdown! I’d also like to welcome my co-commentator for tonight’s battle royale;Red Debuntu Volkersworth.

Red: Thanks, Ken. The energy in this place is truly amazing! These two industry giants intend to settle the score once and for all, and only one can hold the title of Universal Linux Window Manager. Judging by the sound of the crowd, I’d say the two are about to enter the ring. Who’s the favorite in tonight’s challenge?

Ken: Vegas odds have it as an even match going into the fight, although there’s been some talk that KDE’s 4th incarnation might give it the punching power to finally take GNOME out once and for all.

Red: Well, we’ll see. GNOME’s newest entry isn’t too shabby either, Ken. But let’s face it; This battle for desktop dominance has been raging for 10 years now. This is going to be one brutal brawl.

Ken: Yes, I think everyone is waiting to find out if either of them will walk away from this thing intact. So let’s go to the ring.

Announcer: Ladies and gentlemen, and fanboys of all nations! Welcome to tonight’s main event; The Linux Desktop Final Smackdown! In the corner to my right, wearing blue, and weighing in at just under 300 megabytes… The Kollosus… The Konquistidor… The Konqueror… KDE! And in the far corner, wearing a foot symbol… Weighing in at 310 megabytes… The pride of the GNU Project… The Gnerminator… The Gnihilator… GNOME!

ROUND ONE: THE SMACKDOWN

Ken: And there’s the bell. Man! These guys are wasting no time! GNOME charges into the center of the ring and stings KDE with a volley of jabs touting its latest version improvements in 2.2.6 as more advanced than those in KDE’s 4.2.2.

Red: GNOME definitely has a lot of firepower here, Ken. Look at how it’s using its Comprehensive Disc Burning software Brasero, its simpler file sharing via WebDAV, HTTP and Bluetooth, its media player improvements, and its integrated volume control with PulseAudio to really stick it to KDE.

Ken: Absolutely. Maybe this won’t be the fight everyone was expecting after all. GNOME is clearly in a groove now, with this powerful and surprising opening gambit. KDE seems a little off balance and has yet to respond. I almost feel sorry for KDE in the wake
of –

Red: GNOME is down!!!

Ken: What just happened?!?

Red: KDE pointed out that GNOME, at its current version, 2.2.6, is still in version 2.x after almost seven years! Oh! What a stunning blow and realization for the GNOME desktop and user community!

Ken: The referee’s count has reached five, six …

Red: This won’t end that quickly, Ken, GNOME is climbing back to its feet…

Ken: You’re right Red, that knockdown definitely surprised GNOME a bit, but it’s jumping right back into the fray! GNOME is back up and punching wildly with news of its support for multiple monitors, fingerprint authentication and its improved Epiphany web browser!

Red: Yes, and look at that! A viscious one-two punch combination from GNOME comparing Nautilus, it’s all-business file manager, to KDE’s bloated and less stable Dolphin file manager.

Ken: Dolphin? What the heck happened to Konqueror; The do everything file manager?

Red: In a major letdown to users, the KDE team decided to replace Konqueror with Dolphin; in an attempt to use something less bloated than Konqueror.

Ken: That’s like trading butter for that yellow-colored movie popcorn grease. Lots of fat and no taste.

Red: I’d have to agree. But look! KDE is using its new found version 4 speed improvements to stay just out of GNOME’s reach!

Ken: And the blows from KDE’s new Plasma desktop interface and Oxygen artwork are really starting to wear on GNOME’s tired 2.0 interface design, Red.

Red: Clearly… And there’s the bell ending round one!

Ken: Unbelievable! The Ref has to pull these two apart! Red, have you ever seen an opener like this?

Red: …Not since Python put the squeeze on C# a few years ago at that developer conference over in San Jose…

END OF ROUND ONE

Ken: Wow, that was an exciting first round! Let’s go to the scorecard.

Red: At the end of Round One, we have GNOME scoring with those version to version improvements, while KDE’s improvements were mostly bugfixes and not real enhancements. That said, the first knockdown goes to KDE with that notification of GNOME’s version stagnation.

Ken: I’m not sure what that has to do with anything. What difference does the version number make?

Red: As far as functionality goes, nothing. But the GNOME look hasn’t changed since the introduction of version 2.0 back in 2002, while KDE has undergone major transformations with each successive major version step. The point clearly goes to KDE.

Ken: Yes, I can see where you’re coming from. On the other hand, I have the default file manager decision belonging to GNOME because of Nautilus. Changing KDE’s default file manager to Dolphin was a major mistake.

Red: I had it scored that way as well. And the final point for KDE this round is the look, feel and speed of its new Plasma shell interface. Its quick startup and snappy responsiveness feel much lighter than GNOME’s.

Ken: OK! So at the end of Round One, my scorecard has the contenders dead even with two points each. Thanks Red, and now let’s head back to the ring for Round Two.

----


Announcer: …A dead even draw between GNOME and KDE, ladies and gentleman; WE HAVE A DRAW!!!

Ken: A DRAW?!? I don’t believe it!!! A draw!!!

Read full article at: http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7296

To Linux users:

Gnome or KDE?
 

Claverhouse

Royalist Freicorps Feldgendarme
Local time
Today 2:24 PM
Joined
Sep 7, 2007
Messages
1,159
---
Location
Between the Harz and Carpathians
As my KDE 4.4 is responsible for my current difficulties, the computer freezes very randomly and fairly often --- which could be down to any hardware one can name naturally, but I only built it 4 months ago ( cheaply, alas ) and it was working fine until a week ago... --- and there are other difficulties on common with other OpenSuse users, judging by their forums: I'm unthrilled with it right now.

( Sunday has been spent making a new user, and copying .mozilla profiles, which is never as easy as it sounds, but the new user has the same behaviour but less often. )


On the other hand, Gnome is fugly.


I'll chose semi-functioning beauty every time over her plain but efficient soviet sisters. It rather like the horrors of the modern built environment: the depressing effect of functional concrete or utilitarian design or skyscapers cheapens the soul.




Claverhouse :phear:
 

lightspeed

Banned
Local time
Today 8:24 AM
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Messages
357
---
Location
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Kubuntu screenshots:

(not that it differs too much from other KDE desktops)

These are random other people's desktops...not mine.

kubuntu_full.jpg


WoW_OnKubuntuLinux3.jpg
 

walfin

Democrazy
Local time
Today 10:24 PM
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
2,436
---
Location
/dev/null
Kubuntu has gotten steadily worse since the advent of KDE 4. It's not OpenSuse, it's KDE.

But what right do we have to complain when it's free? For all its foibles it's as good as it gets.

Though sometimes I think it's quite absurd that Linux with KDE is now less stable than Windows.

I think I'll be switching to LXDE next. Bad experience with Enlightenment in the past (horrible lag), xfce seems too Gnomish (I just hate GNOME - no beauty, like Claverhouse says), and IceWM is a tad too minimalistic (so you can guess what I think of Fluxbox et al). KDE3.5 with compiz was the best. Wobbly windows, desktop cube and glass effects all ran without a hitch, and you just gotta love the transparent taskbar.

And of course, there's nothing wrong with using Konqi instead of Dolphin.
 

Madoness

that shadow behind lost
Local time
Today 4:24 PM
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
978
---
Location
Estonia
I must openly admit. I am using GNOME, and it kind of fits my needs. I've tried KDE a few times... though somehow didn't like it. There must be something wrong with me?:confused::(
 

NeverAmI

2^(1/12)
Local time
Today 8:24 AM
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
285
---
Location
Iowa
I have way more experience with Gnome than KDE and I prefer Gnome, although I don't know either all that well. I don't typically use linux on my personal machines, usually just servers with runlevel 3.
 

lafmeche

Inmate#2626
Local time
Today 9:24 AM
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
111
---
I rarely use Linux these days... I like games and I just don't care to fiddle with WINE anymore (not that it works for most new games anyway).

Anyway, I've always used Gnome. I try KDE off and on but it's never really done anything for me. Maybe I'm just used to Gnome. Come to think of it, Win7 is pretty painless to use once you're set up. I might not bother with KDE for quite a while.

* Holding off voting because I've probably never really given KDE a fair chance (and I'm sure this rambling post does nothing for the rest of you :p)
 
Top Bottom