Andropov, you seem to share my sentiment on the public education system. If memory serves me correctly, I failed at least two classes per year, for the majority of my high school career. For the latter half of my junior year, I suffered from a moderate form of depression, failing four out of my five classes in one trimester. The one class I passed, I passed by a margin of about two or three percentage points, scraping a D- in AP Government.
Ironically, I was one out of three people in a forty-person class to pass the AP Government AP exam. I never studied, I never paid attention in class, and I may have turned in a dozen assignments all year. Yet I had still managed to master the material better than the vast majority of my classmates, many of whom spent in excess of one hour per night studying, reading, and taking notes on the Pearson government books we had been given the option to buy.
The same thing happened with my AP English class, which I had failed with a 40-something percent. I passed the official exam with flying colors (I received a 4), even though I had opted out of the required essays and had instead decided to create a comic-book style strip depicting Robo-Jesus fighting Christmas Hitler in New York City. In glossing over a few materials at the beginning of the day and relying on a teenager's knowledge-bank of information, my slacking succeeded where a year-long course had failed for so many others.
The difference between me and them, I feel, is that I didn't live the same life as my academic peers. Instead of partying and hanging out with friends once I got home, I'd spend my time debating on Internet forums and losing myself in Wikipedia articles for hours at a time. While many of my acquaintances still watched cartoons and turned off their television sets when George W. Bush made addresses to the nation, I'd watch several hours of news, each and every day. True, I was acting as a classic no-life, the archetypal nerd who never left his house - the fact remains that my personal regimen of education worked far better for me than the institutionalized. Even in the midst of my junior-year slump, most of my free time was spent walking down country roads, wandering for hours on end, thinking and mulling over a multitude of psychological topics.
After receiving my ACT scores in the mail that same summer (roughly half of my scores grouped me in the 99th percentile or higher), reality began to set in. As summer vacation morphed into the early weeks of senior year and the early weeks of senior year dissipated into the routine of autumn, college applications were sent off with expectations high. My high school counselor had all but assured me that, substandard GPA aside, I was almost guaranteed admission to Michigan State University. My ACT scores were far better than the middle 50% and my personal statement was informative and relatively well-written. I had been in MSU student organizations for a year prior and a volunteer at a regional hospital for a similar length of time. My extracurricular activities were all unique and my standardized test scores were all well above average.
Needless to say, I was almost immediately rejected on the basis of my GPA. A public school with a 72% acceptance rate rejected a potential student with outstanding ACT scores, recommendations from his teachers and his school counselor (who was friends with MSU's representative for our region), and an interesting sob story to boot.
You may end up luckier than I did (your SAT scores are very good - my ACT scores were as well, but my math and science subscores were significantly lower than the ones for reading and English), but if you want to up your chances of getting into a good university and not having to suffer a year at community college (it's not the worst place, but it can feel stifling for kids with big plans for the future), you need to turn things around now. Don't do what I did, which was wait until my last year of high school to get all A's. I could have been doing it the entire time, with minimal effort. I'm going to take a wild guess and say that you, like me, aren't going to have to do much more than your homework to get a 4.0.
As utterly obnoxious, redundant, and idiotic as it may seem, there are a lot of people in the real world, with influence over your life, who put more stock into grades than you and I. It's one of those things you can't help. Nice as it would be if colleges could look at every student individually and analyze all aspects of their life to determine who has the most potential, that's not realistic. You get an application, a few recommendations, and approximately 500 words to explain your position. That's it. If you happen to find a place that cares about SAT scores more than anything, maybe you'll be in luck. If you don't, you're pretty screwed.
To reiterate, I know what you're going through and I think that I have a good sense of your state of mind. Schools sucks, but sometimes you've just got to man up and soldier through it, making yourself look like a model college applicant in the process. Painful as it may be for me to admit, I can see why a university would go with an applicant who isn't "naturally" (I use the quotations because what many of us here have isn't natural, it's the result of internal drive and intrinsic motivation) talented and who put a boatload of effort into school to get a 3.95 than somebody who coasted through with nothing to show for their travels but a great SAT score and a GPA of 2.3.
And yeah, the whole scheduling debacle is quite ridiculous.
I'm going to cut myself short here. I see that there's more discussion on page 2 about dropping out and whatnot. Much as I'd like to respond to that right now, it's almost 1AM and I should be getting to bed soon.
Note that this was in response solely to the original post, so I apologize if I didn't hit on any of the more recently discussed topics. Also, sorry if the anecdote was a bit much. Tried to make a point, but sometimes I go overboard with stories in situations where evidence and arguments aren't exactly objective (since this is a matter of opinion, more than anything else).
---> I didn't see how long this was until I went advanced and saw the preview. Whoops! I carried on for several more minutes than I thought. Since this is a drawn-out, first-draft forum post, it probably wasn't the best quality piece of writing I could have turned out. So sorry in advance for any grammatical or stylistic errors.