Keep in mind 100 is the average IQ, for every person above that threshold there's someone below it. This is why politicians favor emotional arguments, a horrifying number of people are simply too stupid to really understand modern day geopolitical and local socioeconomic issues.
If you're on trial and you're innocent, so you want a fair trial, then you absolutely do not want a jury of your peers.
Is a drug dealer in a low income ghetto being judged by other drug dealers in that same geographic area? Almost never, they're judged by people who live in suburbs, people who live in nice condos, maybe 1 or two low income people.
Sounds like justice to me.
You Americans have this weird concept of society, you think human rights are inherent and inalienable, but you're wrong, the protections given to you by a civilized society are enforced by the institutions of that society to protect the interests of that society, because a society that doesn't protect itself, that being the productive members of society, is a society doomed to fail.
If drug dealers were judged by a jury of their peers they'd rarely be found guilty, not because that is justice but because they're criminals who don't want to go to jail when its their turn to stand before the court. If it was the law that all convicted drug dealers were executed society wouldn't be worse off, indeed it would arguably be better for their absence and in many parts of the world that is in fact the penalty.
