• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Anyone else had plans for world domination?

NormannTheDoorman

Rice is love. Rice is life.
Local time
Tomorrow 5:21 AM
Joined
Aug 18, 2012
Messages
437
---
Location
Guam
I think I have far too many. One was cloning myself an army using me. Another was turning my home country of Norway into a superpower and uniting all northern European countries into one. Anyone else have ideas about world domination? These were just small parts of the plans I made.
 

LarsMac

Member
Local time
Today 6:21 PM
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
78
---
Location
Rocky Mountain Empire
Hell no. I am happy just hanging back and letting someone else run the show.
 

Proletar

Deus Sex Machina
Local time
Today 7:21 PM
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
730
---
Location
The Cold North
Do I sense a J in that INT over there?


No. I've debunked many empires though.
 

nanook

a scream in a vortex
Local time
Today 7:21 PM
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
2,026
---
Location
germany
the concept of domination has never been relevant to my interests. uniting people through philosophy and ideology is, though.

when i was a skater, meaning a teen with a punk haircut and without any pubic hairs, i already felt that i should preach the spirit of skateboarding, because my mates, who were much better skaters and had more evolved sex organs, had only a very superficial awareness of the liberating significance of skate spirit and i wasn't too surprised to see, that they would soon give it all up for a little bit of social acceptance, going to billard bars, exchanging skate rags against fashion, working for capitalism to afford overpriced alcohol, getting laid -> few years later wearing suits.

a while later, i was imagining that my sleeping countrymen should be shocked with huge video panels, showing 3rd-world people dying in real time. that was a bit like a psychotic peak for me.

i'm now balanced. i heart philosophy and spirituality, but this visionary voice in me is primarily meant to guide my perceptions towards penetrating the issue of samsara more deeply and perhaps secondarily to inspire the like minded.
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Today 7:21 AM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,155
---
I've got many plans, most involve leveraging of some kind of technology, for example a "diplomatic super weapon" in the form of an advanced email based chatbot, imagine if everyone on Earth could talk to one person an that one person could reply to everyone, at least everyone with an email address or social media page.

The idea came to me when I was thinking about how often I have to have the same conversations over and over with different people, so why not automate it? I think this could be a real force for good, I mean everyone wants the world to be a better place right, well at least most people do, it's just that the world's problems are too big/complex for any one person to make a real difference, but if I can talk to everyone then, insofar as they'll let me I can organize everyone, and I could source and distribute precisely the right information to change people's opinions/perspectives for the better.

Heck even if this only works 0.001% of the time I'll still be getting through to a hell of a lot of people.
 

Minuend

pat pat
Local time
Today 7:21 PM
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
4,142
---
No. I had a greater desire to avoid human interaction all together by living in a cabin in a forest far from all.

Except internet.
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Today 7:21 AM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,155
---
There are of course many, many plans involving robotics in some form or another, but my current favourite is the "all in one factory" which was inspired by playing Portal 2 oddly enough. So imagine a car factory with all it's robot arms, already such factories are being designed so they can make several different types of car on the one production line, but why stop there, with modular tools the same production line could churn out white goods, furniture, electronics, y'know everything.

If you think about it that's absolutely the most efficient way to go, instead of rebuilding factories every time you want to mass manufacture one product, design a smart factory that can redesign itself to make anything from raw materials. Better yet with a foundry on site a lot of the materials could come from recycling, also instead of mass manufacturing crap that you hope people are going to buy, everything could be on a by-order basis, indeed every single thing that comes out of that factory could be unique.

There's 3D printing sites where people post their designs for free, but what if they got paid, the factory itself may be automated but it would create jobs for work-at-home designers/artists/engineers who instead of getting paid an hourly wage or salary would submit their designs and get a percentage of the profit on however many are actually made (depending upon factors of complexity so there's as much incentive to design real cars as toy cars) and there would be feedback & rating systems so the good designs (and designers) would get acknowledged over the bad.

So there would be one of these factories in each region and aside from raw materials this insane system of global freight would cease, and more importantly everyone (even people who want to prototype stuff) will get exactly what they want, there won't be any more reject stores (retail outlets where other retails dump the crap they can't sell) and because of that I imagine it'll all end up being cheaper.

And makes building my robot army of doom all the easier.
 

Chronomar

NOPE
Local time
Today 6:21 PM
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
678
---
I've got many plans, most involve leveraging of some kind of technology, for example a "diplomatic super weapon" in the form of an advanced email based chatbot, imagine if everyone on Earth could talk to one person an that one person could reply to everyone, at least everyone with an email address or social media page.

The idea came to me when I was thinking about how often I have to have the same conversations over and over with different people, so why not automate it? I think this could be a real force for good, I mean everyone wants the world to be a better place right, well at least most people do, it's just that the world's problems are too big/complex for any one person to make a real difference, but if I can talk to everyone then, insofar as they'll let me I can organize everyone, and I could source and distribute precisely the right information to change people's opinions/perspectives for the better.

Heck even if this only works 0.001% of the time I'll still be getting through to a hell of a lot of people.

This is a really great idea. What would you say though?

It's an interesting thing to think on--how to best convey in the clearest (not everyone will be a native English speaker, and automated translation only goes so far), in most concise format possible, a message that would change the world to the greatest degree in a positive direction.
 

Chronomar

NOPE
Local time
Today 6:21 PM
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
678
---
I routinely like think up which countries should ally together to maximize their influence (based on who has which resources, geographical location, composition of their militaries, cultural/economic/value ties, etc.) ... this is fun because you learn a lot about global politics and power.

Most of my "take over the world" plots were more theoretical, for "somebody", not me, fun only because of the planning it took.

Like nanook I never really liked the idea of it, in the end.

But, world domination as achieved by an idea, not a person, I could get behind.

That's what I like planning now.
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Today 7:21 AM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,155
---
But, world domination as achieved by an idea, not a person, I could get behind.
Well that's kind of the idea, I figure all differences aside people essentially want the same things, so my bot talks to them (builds a psychological profile and deduces their beliefs) then slowly but surely talks them around to my communist/industrialist way of thinking (like the "all in one factory" and more) so when I make a play for power through other means they'll be more accepting of it, indeed I could even refer people to each other who I think will have a positive effect on one another, e.g. a racist and an ethnic minority that both love the same leisure activities.

Anyway I wouldn't actually be saying anything per say, my bot would understand my position, figure out the position of the other person, discuss the overlap initially, then slowly work it's way up through the differences in the most agreeable way possible, something I personally don't have the patience to do ;)
 

Puffy

"Wtf even was that"
Local time
Today 6:21 PM
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
3,859
---
Location
Path with heart
Ehh, I would hope any plan with the word domination in the title would appear problematic. :p

I think this could be a real force for good, I mean everyone wants the world to be a better place right, well at least most people do, it's just that the world's problems are too big/complex for any one person to make a real difference, but if I can talk to everyone then, insofar as they'll let me I can organize everyone, and I could source and distribute precisely the right information to change people's opinions/perspectives for the better.

The first and second parts appear to have a contradiction to me; the world's problems are too complex for one person, yet you presume that you can speak for everyone, and that you could be an arbiter of information towards the 'right' direction. In this worldwide exchange, I'm sure many would have the chance to read your voice, but I wonder how many emails you'd respond to? ;)
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Today 7:21 AM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,155
---
In this worldwide exchange, I'm sure many would have the chance to read your voice, but I wonder how many emails you'd respond to?
All of them.

Well my chatbots will formulate the actual responses but I'll be directing the whole thing with data analysis software, y'see the real trick of it is figuring out how to make a bot that can read and understand what someone's talking about, which is difficult but by no means impossible, then it formulates a response based upon what I would say given the extensive profile it would have of my thoughts/opinions/personality/etc.

Obviously this wouldn't be easy, we're talking about some really clever software here and I haven't yet figured out exactly how it's going to work, but none of the challenges I see are insurmountable.

The whole idea is that I don't have to talk to people directly because my bots would know what I would say and how I would respond, so they talk for me and collect data on people's responses which I can then analyze with yet more clever software so I can edit/refine the database of my thoughts/opinions/personality/etc that the bots are working from, perhaps eventually getting to a level of complexity/sophistication where I'm not just telling people my thoughts and recording data on theirs, I'll be able to "listen" to people's problem on an individual basis, give them advice/directions, direct others to help them, and all sorts of other things.

But still let me make this perfectly clear, with this system I'm not talking to anyone directly, it's all through the database and the bots that take their cues from it, I just do holistic data analysis and edit/develop the database.

The first and second parts appear to have a contradiction to me; the world's problems are too complex for one person, yet you presume that you can speak for everyone, and that you could be an arbiter of information towards the 'right' direction.
I can try, how does that saying go...
"a saint is a sinner that keeps on trying"
 
Top Bottom