Black Rose
An unbreakable bond
This is what I have so far, need help with type interactions(4 phases of matter) Introvert and Extrovert.
- why are they divided up in this way in particular? what makes water T etc.
- what characteristics do each of the elements have in common with each other, and how does this map to the characteristics of the functions?
- we need an introverted and extraverted interpretation of each element
Fire represents outward energy, but it also represents warmth and comfort (see: socionics sensing)
Both fire and air are light, water and earth are heavy.
Fire is hot, Earth is solid, Air rises without bound, Water does what?
Can we create rings of three functions? e.g. just water/fire/earth or just fire/air/water
We need a full range of the properties of each element, then we can make systems by only considering specific properties
We should forget N/F/T/S even exist. Typology should be made purely elemental.
whatter is watter?
Mastering all for functions lets you do?
Okay AK47, this is all wrong. Water, fire, earth, and air have nothing to do with the cognitive functions.
'sigh'
You'd be best to scrap all of this. Having an Ego Death is never fun, but you'll soon realize why what you're doing right now is completely irrelevant. I'm sorry if I'm coming of as rude, but I'm doing this in your favor.
The more complex the mind, the greater the need for the simplicity of play.
Philosophy, and as a result Western Civilization [sp] as a whole, was created by meditation on the four elements. I for one, do not see myself as above such a question lest I see myself as above the greatest minds of all time.
But even the greatest minds can come to false conclusions if the premise they work from is wrong. (the four elements)
But even the greatest minds can come to false conclusions if the premise they work from is wrong. (the four elements)
Symbolism is neither true nor false, it simply is. Philosophy cannot make claims of knowledge. Meditation on structure in the form of symbolic archetypes leads to higher states of understanding.
Life is like a bowl of noodles. Some noodles are longer than others.
Ooh! It's so profound!
Symbolism in this form is a subtly presented opinion, and as such is neither true nor false. While it may look artistic, there is nothing to substantiate this model as anything but an attempt to combine two of the author's interests, followed, of course, by several vague and almost incoherient statements about how the different functions and elements relate.
You mean reading the article in order to sleep faster?I have read this article before I slept yesterday, and I... well, I think that it is nice idea
You mean reading the article in order to sleep faster?![]()