It's all bogus, man.
You can do it.
I'm usually disappointed with a progress I've made. When it begins I plan on doing this, this, and this but by the end of the day it seems as if I could have worked harder/gotten more done than I actually did. What is that? Is that what ritalin is for? Factors include needing to take breaks for meals and maybe some other random things.
Some need a little more exercise, training and attention than others.
But who said that a pill can make good for those?
the thing is, it also destroys your brain.
Yeah drugs tend to do that.
The add/ADHD stuff is mostly horseshit. Anyone can take the drug and have improved concentration. They should have just marketed them as a nootropic.
I'm not even diagnosed but could probably "benefit" from taking Ritalin.
I thought they also recently standardized shyness as a disorder? They're gonna start prescribing cocaine to people, which is basically what Ritalin is![]()
Maybe so to all of the above, who knows, but I have a very short attention span and cant seem to learn things that I NEED to learn without medication that increases my attention span.
If you cant relate to the topic please refrain from making any comments, im not looking for why you think ADD doesnt exist or why you think medication is nonsense. Im not trying to sound like a dick but I'm looking for personal experiences that I can relate to as someone who does have ADD.
For those who do have ADD which of these medications do you prefer? Adderrall makes me agitated when I have to deal with other human beings but it gets the job done, and ritalin used to work when I was very young but its been such a long time since Ive tried ritalin.
Most of that is probably the SJ oriented school system sucking. Not knowing what page the class is on happens sometimes, if you're intp it's probably normal enough from speculating on personal curricula or going off on a tangent, depending on the class you're in I guess. Even if it's something you really like the teacher could suck.
Even when I do extracurricular reading sometimes re-reading is necessary probably for the same reasons listed above ^
probably just read later and do something more conducive for the moment or convince yourself to have discipline and get the thing done
everyone has add
I've always wanted to try it once just to see how different I'd operate
Most of that is probably the SJ oriented school system sucking. Not knowing what page the class is on happens sometimes, if you're intp it's probably normal enough from speculating on personal curricula or going off on a tangent, depending on the class you're in I guess. Even if it's something you really like the teacher could suck.
Even when I do extracurricular reading sometimes re-reading is necessary probably for the same reasons listed above ^
probably just read later and do something more conducive for the moment or convince yourself to have discipline and get the thing done
everyone has add
I've always wanted to try it once just to see how different I'd operate
Most of that is probably the SJ oriented school system sucking. Not knowing what page the class is on happens sometimes, if you're intp it's probably normal enough from speculating on personal curricula or going off on a tangent, depending on the class you're in I guess. Even if it's something you really like the teacher could suck.
Even when I do extracurricular reading sometimes re-reading is necessary probably for the same reasons listed above ^
probably just read later and do something more conducive for the moment or convince yourself to have discipline and get the thing done
everyone has add
I've always wanted to try it once just to see how different I'd operate
I don't know man, the thought of putting children to meds that can scar their mind just so they can get honors... It's just plain wrong.
So far no one has answered Coopers question.
^^ not really. It hasn't really been a thing I was ultra interested in to attempt to look more in depth to. Appreciate the links and testimony though. If I did actually read everything and still said the same thing it might be a little different.
The add/ADHD stuff is mostly horseshit. Anyone can take the drug and have improved concentration. They should have just marketed them as a nootropic.
I'm not even diagnosed but could probably "benefit" from taking Ritalin.
I thought they also recently standardized shyness as a disorder? They're gonna start prescribing cocaine to people, which is basically what Ritalin is![]()
I was trying to get to the root of the concern
Yeah drugs tend to do that.
Attention deficiency is overdiagnosed and ritalin is a nootropic. Therefore I am afraid it follows that Pissbeak and Salmon are completely justified in being disrespectful cunts who don't know what they are talking about.![]()
Scanning through, it doesn't appear that anyone actually addressed the specific meds (if someone has... sorry).
None of those listed. Strattera is what you want, because it's not a stimulant. Adderall/Ritalin/Concerta et al do cause very real brain damage with long term use.
G'nite folks. Fishin' in the mornin'![]()
But over-diagnosis ALSO doesn't negate the fact the condition is real. Is your attitude typical in Sweden, I wonder? Are there more and more people getting this dx?
I have problems with the application of the word nootropic. That implies a neurotypical person that takes a 'smart drug' to get a boost, or enhanced capabilities.
ADHD medication is not used as such. It is not applied to go from a baseline operation to an enhanced operation, but to go from a sub-par operation to a baseline operation or neurotypical standard.
Therefore, ADHD medication, such as methylfenidate, cannot be considered nootropics for people with ADHD and is therefore rightfully labeled a 'medication', not a nootropic.
Never said it was perfect.Doesn't Strattera also have sideeffects? And what about the long term use? Strattera affects the liver and may damage it used long term. 1:50.000 chance.
It can cause suicidal thoughts. Also, quick to anger and irritation.
I don'think it is fair to elevate one particular medicine above another.
I also always have this idea that people worry a lot, rightfully so - believe me, I lived it - about the sideefects yet forget that the need for it outweighs the risks.
To live with ADHD and be so debilitated is worse than taking the chance to damage your liver, brain or whatever. It seems to me that there is this notion in critics that you need to preserve your live and brain and what not for future use.
Which is a fair goal. But is it a worthy goal, when in the meantime, as you live your life when you need the assistance of the drug when it matters the most, you preserve your future body by sacrificing the positive results you may have in the here and now?
What is so important about your future liver that you will have a terrible life? At what point would you start taking a potentially harmful medicine? At age 25? 35? After 40? But what wasted years do you leave behind, where your life is a continues struggle for concentration, attention, focus, clarity? Dealing with all the myriad issues that branch of from it, at work, in relationships, in your family and with friends?
If I get liver failure at 75, so be it. In saying that I want to convey the notion that having this disorder requires one to take responsibility for it and accept the bad hand you've been dealt in life. So you get bodily issues later in life perchance. But I would not sacrifice my whole life going without it out of fear of e.g. liver failire.
And certainly not with 1 to 50.000 chance, as per a 2005 UK study.
It is, but... From the modafinil wiki article:Why isn't modafinil being used to tread add that's what I wonder...
Largest population with ADHD diagnoses? The children...Approval for ADHD in children was rejected in 2006 due primarily to two cases of skin rash, one severe, suspected to have been erythema multiforme or Stevens–Johnson syndrome, among 933 subjects receiving the drug.[10][11][12][13]
That's the spirit!You can make it at home, maybe too, or you can accidentally make it and destroy it because you accidentally made it.
Not all drugs. Even now you have DMT in your brain, which is dimethyltriptamine, so in fact you have an illegal substance in your blood. It is the most harmless drugs, because it is metabolized so fast, the trip takes mere minutes.
Other substances have no harmful effects, like heroine in pure form and psilocybine, which is very closely related to brain chemistry. There are others. I don't have a list ready.
But over-diagnosis ALSO doesn't negate the fact the condition is real. Is your attitude typical in Sweden, I wonder? Are there more and more people getting this dx?
I have problems with the application of the word nootropic. That implies a neurotypical person that takes a 'smart drug' to get a boost, or enhanced capabilities.
ADHD medication is not used as such. It is not applied to go from a baseline operation to an enhanced operation, but to go from a sub-par operation to a baseline operation or neurotypical standard.
Therefore, ADHD medication, such as methylfenidate, cannot be considered nootropics for people with ADHD and is therefore rightfully labeled a 'medication', not a nootropic.
I once had ADD. I took Concerta for a few months, got somewhat angry and hungry, grew a pair of man-boobs, and stopped. My ADD was cured!
-Duxwing
I once had ADD. I took Concerta for a few months, got somewhat angry and hungry, grew a pair of man-boobs, and stopped. My ADD was cured!
-Duxwing
^This. Risperdal at the same time? If so, that's probably the source of the boobage.How did you manage to gain weight by taking a medicine which accelerates your metabolism and decreases hunger? :S
^This. Risperdal at the same time? If so, that's probably the source of the boobage.
They need to start pumping people with modafinil, seriously. My doctor didn't even know what it was, I will never get my hands on it unless the states state that it's the thing.
I was attempting sarcasm with my last post, it is as you say. Though I disagree about ADHD meds not being nootropics for those with ADHD, I see what you mean but one could as well say that people with ADHD have a lower baseline ability. I would also wager that the definition of nootropic includes any increase in mental performance.
Though... Does that mean that alcohol is a nootropic when administered to those suffering withdrawal syndrome?