A system to win at Roulette on online casinos

[LAM]

http://www.easyformula4success.com/aunz/thankyou.html

I really don't understand what the catch with this is. It seems like a system that would work well and doesn't seem to have any pitfalls. I tried it out on the eurogrand casino software but without using any real money and basically could not find a way to lose money. Does anyone know anything about this?

 

[Claverhouse]

From the site:

...and I began to analyze all the ins and outs. I soon discovered that some of these casino sites are worth $8 Billion!

To get started, choose a casino from the list below

Funniest of all:

Luck has nothing to do with Roulette, and only those who are willing to gamble their money away rely on luck.


Roulette is pure luck. Just like, but more so as an exemplar, everything else in life.



I hope you win; but possibly you have won so far due to the software installed from the site. At a guess, this is a site dedicated to getting people to gamble at those establishments. Should you then become a degenerate gambler, and lose money you can't afford to lose, there's no-one to sue for you having taken free advice off an internet page...


There is no such thing as a system in gambling. If there were, then those establishments would have each been cleaned out of $8 billon yesterday.


[ I know nothing of gambling nor of mathematics: I know when someone's barking outside a tent though. ]


A month back I bought an old 1930s autobiography: Jan van Overhof's 'The Diary of a Gambler' written by D. A. Haselhoff Lich after the other's suicide at Mentone... Half deals with stories of persons at Monte Carlo then, and the other half exposes the odds of different roulette systems.

The only proper way to win massively at roulette, whether you are the Bank/House or the mark, is to rig the wheel in one's own favour: that is the good old traditional way.




Claverhouse

 

[5k17]

Is that supposed to be a new system? I'm quite sure I already read about something very similar years ago.
Anyway, while a normal game with constant bets will theoretically, if repeated ad infinitum, result in neither winning nor losing anything, this is more of an all-or-nothing approach (with a very small, but nevertheless still present chance for losing everything).
Plus, a statement such as "[T]he more times (in a row) one color comes out, the higher the probability is that the opposite color will come out sooner or later." is complete nonsense. It may be improbable that you get red 20 times in a row, but already having 19 does not in the slightest change the chances for the next roll.

 

[nexion]

Are you talking about online gambling? You are aware that nothing can be truly random on the computer as it is in real life don't you? There are algorithms determining this stuff that seems random, but truly isn't. If you had these algorithms, it would probably be possible to know each and every move.

 

[fullerene]

*snickers*... I think they just wrapped up a bunch of fallacies and packaged them into a strategy they were looking to sell.

If he's smart, the owner wrote all that software and bugged it so that using his strategies always worked when you played for free. If he's dumb, he probably got someone else to do it for him.

 

[Trebuchet]

Is that supposed to be a new system? I'm quite sure I already read about something very similar years ago.
Anyway, while a normal game with constant bets will theoretically, if repeated ad infinitum, result in neither winning nor losing anything, this is more of an all-or-nothing approach (with a very small, but nevertheless still present chance for losing everything).
Plus, a statement such as "[T]he more times (in a row) one color comes out, the higher the probability is that the opposite color will come out sooner or later." is complete nonsense. It may be improbable that you get red 20 times in a row, but already having 19 does not in the slightest change the chances for the next roll.

This is exactly right, except that the house takes a small percentage when the ball lands on green, and then red and black both lose. This isn't a system for winning, it is just a lot of fallacies that look like common sense. Play roulette for fun if you want, but not to make money.

 

[I'mProbablyanINTP]

So you'll find whoever made that website gets money per download + signup / referral from that site.

He 'teaches' you how to gamble so that you will gamble on the sites 'he' recommends, which he may or may not own or have a stake in.

The system of doubling your bet every time only works in a vacuum where you have infinite money to bet. Since no possible scenario exists, the house will eventually win because it has more money than you. You could win $8million and lose it the next roll and go bankrupt for good. The casino offers planes and shit to big time gamblers because they recognise even a winner will have his dog day.

 

[LAM]

NM this system is BS. I didn't put any real money on it but I did research this. Doesn't work.

 

[nexion]

Its what I thought at the start as well, although after testing the casinos extsensively on free mode I have to say I am thinking it might be possible. I would have to go onto one colour more than 8 times in a row. And that is uinlikely to happen.

Apparently the guy who made that website stole from this website which actually seems better;

http://www.cmsystem-guide.com/cmsgu...il.com&xhfjryus1oOnnskj28=Free+Instant+Access

I kid you not, when I say, if you can get the algorithm, you can know all the outcomes with 100% certainty. Theoretically.