• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

A fantastic resource for stimulating thought... 21st century enlightenment, and beyond.

Linsejko

Ghost of עמק רפאים.
Local time
Today 10:31 AM
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
603
---
Location
In the center of the world. (As opposed to the ear
RSA videos are immensely impressive. Check out this one on 21st Century Enlightenment (one of the heavier, deeper ones I've seen so far that really required me to listen and think):

YouTube - RSA Animate - 21st century enlightenment

Aside from that though, there are a huge number of stimulating, entertaining, educational videos from this group, and I feel smarter for having seen them--not something I would say lightly.

Feel free to post others that you find interesting, or from other sources.

.L
 

Observer

Member
Local time
Today 5:31 PM
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
41
---
Location
Denmark
I saw your first post, watched the video, went to the site, found the smile or die video and watched that, and then came back here to only to see you highlight it in your second post.

That is some good stuff my friend, I'll be bookmarking that.

Although the main theme of the smile or die video is about striving for realism, it does touch on the cruelty of telling people, whenever they have a problem, that it's really all in their head due to lack of optimism. That is something that has frustrated me a lot.

I couldn't help but recall this xkcd:
positive_attitude.png
 

Roran

The Original Nerdy Gangsta
Local time
Today 11:31 AM
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
431
---
Location
North Carolina, USA
Hooray for web comics!
 

zago

Banned
Local time
Today 11:31 AM
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
121
---
All I can say is "wow." Those videos from OP enrage me. I was very impressed by your recent posts in "basic guidelines for social success," Linsejko, so I went browsing through some of your posts and threads. I saw things I liked, but this surprises me.

Edit: I suppose I should give a basic explanation of why these vids anger me. There are many reasons, but I guess they can all be grouped under one big main reason that is: this is a bunch of socialist bullshit by idiots who don't understand economics.

And there is almost nothing I hate more than people who talk about how "studies show" that people aren't good at predicting what makes them happy. What are you gonna do about it you babbling fuck? Try to make people's decisions for them, or limit them? That's what I thought. That's what socialists always get a huge boner for.

And they cry about greed and corporate layoffs. Typical. Cry about it. The bastards don't understand economics. Clearly they also have a big boner for "workers" and "manufacturing" as if that is all that economics consists of, and the financial aspect is only there for bloodsucking greedy leeches. Then again, they don't understand economics (edit 2: at all).

By the way, these intellectual blowhard assholes don't understand economics. They should go and read "Basic Economics" by Thomas Sowell. Then they will understand what it really means to be "enlightened" by something. Great fuckin book for socialists to read. Basic economics.

I hate these emotional thinkers who can't stop crying about greed and corporatism. Go fuckin kill yourself already. Empathic capacity? WHAT THE FUCK? Look pal, I don't give a FUCK about understanding you or anyone else in the world. What, are you gonna force me to, you raving socialist? Are you gonna try to "redistribute" my wealth?

Ya know. That kind of stuff.
 

boondockbabe

I am a little cold hearted
Local time
Today 10:31 AM
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
342
---
Location
BFE Missouri
Aou have obiousy never had a hard day in your life.
 

zago

Banned
Local time
Today 11:31 AM
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
121
---
Aou have obiousy never had a hard day in your life.

Ha, people like you piss me off. You don't know me. I've faced shit that would make you break down and cry. You don't know how to type, either. And probably don't understand economics. It's the pie-in-the-sky assholes of those videos that need to come back down to Earth. Go figure, someone would respond to my post with something completely baseless.
 

sammael

Adrift
Local time
Tomorrow 5:31 AM
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
234
---
Ha, people like you piss me off. You don't know me. I've faced shit that would make you break down and cry. You don't know how to type, either. And probably don't understand economics. It's the pie-in-the-sky assholes of those videos that need to come back down to Earth. Go figure, someone would respond to my post with something completely baseless.

Don't be such a dick zago, this is the reason why you were met with so much resistance in your guidelines for social success thread. It's not necessarily what you say, it's the way you go about it. Personal attacks achieve nothing, they only make enemies. Being entirely objective, both your above posts make you sound like a self important, presuming asshole. If you're actually not, then perhaps you'll think about the way you're portraying yourself, and realise a little understanding, acceptance and objectivity will go a long way.
 

Lobstrich

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 4:31 PM
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
1,434
---
Location
Ireland
Ha, people like you piss me off. You don't know me. I've faced shit that would make you break down and cry.
Quit the selfpity, 'shit' is relative. For some people a broken nail is enough to break down. But okay, let's measure out "I've had a tougher life than you" Tell me what you've seen, what you've experienced. You mother and father got divorced? You turned to drugs? You got into a bad circle of people, turned to crime? Was your father a drug addict? Did he hit you?

We could also go extreme. I could ask you if you've experience what many other people have. Have you seen your own mother raped and killed in front of you? Have you had your skin torn off becuase you've been suspected a witch? Have you had your arms cut off? A lot of people have experienced that. So should they be pissed off that you're whining because of some fucking drugs? Or whatever it is that you've experienced..

I certaintly know that you, piss me off.

You don't know how to type, either.
Non of us do.. According to the MBTI theory itself. Only oneself can type.. Oneself. Not anyone else.

And probably don't understand economics. It's the pie-in-the-sky assholes of those videos that need to come back down to Earth. Go figure, someone would respond to my post with something completely baseless.
I'm sure you have great knowledge on those things. We will never be able to fathom it. And because you have some bachelor degree, your opinion is more valid than hers or any of ours?

You know what amuses me? Ignorance.. You amuse me Zago, you really do.
 

zago

Banned
Local time
Today 11:31 AM
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
121
---
Don't be such a dick zago, this is the reason why you were met with so much resistance in your guidelines for social success thread. It's not necessarily what you say, it's the way you go about it. Personal attacks achieve nothing, they only make enemies. Being entirely objective, both your above posts make you sound like a self important, presuming asshole. If you're actually not, then perhaps you'll think about the way you're portraying yourself, and realise a little understanding, acceptance and objectivity will go a long way.

I'm not the type of person to turn the other cheek. Call me an asshole, sure. People love assholes. Every once in a while you gotta choose between being an asshole or a sucker.

Quit the selfpity, 'shit' is relative. For some people a broken nail is enough to break down. But okay, let's measure out "I've had a tougher life than you" Tell me what you've seen, what you've experienced. You mother and father got divorced? You turned to drugs? You got into a bad circle of people, turned to crime? Was your father a drug addict? Did he hit you?

I don't want to discuss my personal life with you.

We could also go extreme. I could ask you if you've experience what many other people have. Have you seen your own mother raped and killed in front of you? Have you had your skin torn off becuase you've been suspected a witch? Have you had your arms cut off? A lot of people have experienced that. So should they be pissed off that you're whining because of some fucking drugs? Or whatever it is that you've experienced..
Christ man, I'm not saying I've experienced the worst life in the world. This is the sort of argument that seems like it was only made for its own sake. Dude said I've never had a tough day in my life. I don't think you have to have had your skin peeled off to be able to say you've experienced some shit in life.

I certaintly know that you, piss me off.
Well, what am I gonna do about it? I consider you lucky. Back in my heyday of internet forum usage, I posted roughly twice a day. I believe my rate here is like 0.5 per day or something. Hopefully that doesn't ruin the forum for you.


Non of us do.. According to the MBTI theory itself. Only oneself can type.. Oneself. Not anyone else.
His post was riddled with misspellings... again with the excessive eagerness to nitpick...


I'm sure you have great knowledge on those things. We will never be able to fathom it. And because you have some bachelor degree, your opinion is more valid than hers or any of ours?
When did I ever say I knew anything about economics beyond a basic level? I didn't. I've read a couple books on the subject. Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell is enough to destroy any left-leaning person's political philosophy. Of particular relevance to this thread, though, is his book Intellectuals and Society. He delivers a scathing, even humiliating history of intellectuals' beliefs and how they have turned out to be very misinformed (in the same way that the vids in OP are).

Gee, I really don't see why I piss you off when I answer every single one of your personal attacks on me with a thorough justification of my viewpoint..

You know what amuses me? Ignorance.. You amuse me Zago, you really do.
Do I piss you off, or do I amuse you? I don't think both simultaneously is possible. Personal attacks don't become you, lobstrich.
 

Lobstrich

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 4:31 PM
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
1,434
---
Location
Ireland
I don't think you have to have had your skin peeled off to be able to say you've experienced some shit in life.
No you don't. But the "My life has been a lot tougher than yours" attitude is a little boring, don't you think? You don't now what neither me nor Boondock has exeperienced. So what makes you capable of assuming that you've experienced stuff that would make her cry?


His post was riddled with misspellings... again with the excessive eagerness to nitpick...
Misspellings are irrelevant. Vocabulary is irrelevant. What matters is her opinion. I guess you feel intellectually superior because you have proper grammar..
I just think you're a pretentious pseudo-intellectual.

When did I ever say I knew anything about economics beyond a basic level? I didn't. I've read a couple books on the subject. Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell is enough to destroy any left-leaning person's political philosophy. Of particular relevance to this thread, though, is his book Intellectuals and Society. He delivers a scathing, even humiliating history of intellectuals' beliefs and how they have turned out to be very misinformed (in the same way that the vids in OP are).
You've read a book, you must be proud. Let me be the first to tell you that this, makes your opinion on the matter much more valid than any other. Because you've read a book. Reading books make you smart.


Gee, I really don't see why I piss you off when I answer every single one of your personal attacks on me with a thorough justification of my viewpoint..
Don't act as if my personal attacks are completely out of line. You're attitude is obnoxious, and you know it. When you say "fuck you" you should not be surprised to get a "fuck you too"

Do I piss you off, or do I amuse you? I don't think both simultaneously is possible.
It's very much possible to be amused and pissed off at the same time. 'celebrities' that are "famous for being famous" like Paris Hilton. Are famous for that very reason.

Besides. It's also very much possible that I started of, pissed off in the beginning and then ended up amused.

personal attacks don't become you, lobstrich
Judging people, feeling superior, thinking you know stuff about us that we don't even know ourselves, *doesn't become you*. (That's the proper way of spelling it) I'd think you knew that. Seeing that you're a teacher and that you feel you have the right to judge other people by their spelling... Zago.
 

zago

Banned
Local time
Today 11:31 AM
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
121
---
The fact that you are still replying is ridiculous and baffling. Whatever. I'm in the mood to argue, so:

1. It's hilarious that you're now saying I don't know what either you or Boondock has experienced and am bragging about my tough life. Let's get this straight: I never said anything about you so don't involve yourself. I replied to someone who made an obnoxious and hasty personal attack against me. The end. This is not some debate about who has had the hardest life. The point is that this idiot was wrong about my never having had a tough day in my life, and he was extremely haughty (far more so than I have ever been here) to make that statement.

2. LMAO @ your disregarding of spelling and grammar. Yes, spelling and grammar is a reflection of your intelligence, and using them poorly is definitely grounds for judging someone. I'm willing to cut people slack considering this informal setting, but this moron can't even type the words "you" or "obviously," apparently. My last girlfriend used poor spelling and grammar when chatting online with me. It distracted from the meaning she was trying to convey and stuck out like a sore thumb. I found it unattractive. You may say, "that is so callous." I don't choose how I feel about things. If I find something distasteful, that's because it is distasteful. I don't need to ask myself whether I'm being nice or not. Guess what: people are judging you--everyone, all the time. It is impossible not to. So you better put your best foot forward, because you aren't getting around this one.

3. You pretend that I'm bragging when I'm clearly not. I re-asserted in my last post that my understanding of economics is basic, being that I have only read a couple books about it--no big deal. However, even my basic understanding is enough for me to know that most people have zero understanding of economics. I will add, though, that I am proud of my achievements and I am proud to have some understanding of economics. I don't know many people IRL who would bother to try to educate themselves about economics. You are completely free to shatter my pride if you can, though. I invite you to, because I'll see it as a call to improve. If I'm wrong, I should know about it.

4. My attitude is more confident than obnoxious, but I never said I wouldn't be a little obnoxious. People here have a tendency to take my arguments personally for some reason. I have not, however, seen an actual refutation of what I said about the RSA vids in OP. I've just seen people get angry about my apparent arrogance. The only way to make me look and feel stupid would be to actually prove me wrong, rather than get angry about the way I deliver. You want me to act like I am not sure of myself! Further, I never said people can't lash out at me if they think I'm obnoxious. Go right ahead. And I'll come right back at you with all I've got.

5. I didn't make a type-o when I said "personal attacks don't become you." You seem to think I did. But I guess to be consistent with my last point, I'll do the same kind of thing you've done in this thread and the "basic guidelines" thread (this is going to feel really weird): lobstrich, you are a foolish douchebag. I pity you for your stupidity. I feel sorry for your family, having a member who would argue so vehemently against simple and basic guidelines for social success, such as "keep your nails trimmed." See what I mean? I don't think that kind of statement becomes me at all. If you'll go back and notice, I always explain myself and never just barf out a bunch of unsupported insults.

6. Irony of the decade: you just professed to believe that since I am a teacher, I should not be so critical of people who can't use the English language. What kind of teacher do you envision? A teacher who would accept and admire slop so as not to make students feel dumb? How substandard! Not only do I have the right to judge people for their poor spelling, it is also my job. How cool is that? I am actually paid to judge people's academic performance! Judgment is half the basis of the student teacher relationship; the expert's duty is to evaluate the performance of the trainee and give feedback. Having a soft teacher is a rip-off. You'll get feedback that doesn't hurt your feelings, but you'll also have an inflated picture of your performance. Again, you can thank me via PM when you realize that this is what I've done for you.
 

Lobstrich

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 4:31 PM
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
1,434
---
Location
Ireland
The fact that you are still replying is ridiculous and baffling. Whatever. I'm in the mood to argue, so:

1. It's hilarious that you're now saying I don't know what either you or Boondock has experienced and am bragging about my tough life. Let's get this straight: I never said anything about you so don't involve yourself. I replied to someone who made an obnoxious and hasty personal attack against me. The end. This is not some debate about who has had the hardest life. The point is that this idiot was wrong about my never having had a tough day in my life, and he was extremely haughty (far more so than I have ever been here) to make that statement.

2. LMAO @ your disregarding of spelling and grammar. Yes, spelling and grammar is a reflection of your intelligence, and using them poorly is definitely grounds for judging someone. I'm willing to cut people slack considering this informal setting, but this moron can't even type the words "you" or "obviously," apparently. My last girlfriend used poor spelling and grammar when chatting online with me. It distracted from the meaning she way trying to convey and stuck out like a sore thumb. I found it unattractive. You may say, "that is so callous." I don't choose how I feel about things. If I find something distasteful, that's because it is distasteful. I don't need to ask myself whether I'm being nice or not. Guess what: people are judging you--everyone, all the time. It is impossible not to. So you better put your best foot forward, because you aren't getting around this one.

3. You pretend that I'm bragging when I'm clearly not. I re-asserted in my last post that my understanding of economics is basic, being that I have only read a couple books about it--no big deal. However, even my basic understanding is enough for me to know that most people have zero understanding of economics. I will add, though, that I am proud of my achievements and I am proud to have some understanding of economics. I don't know many people IRL who would bother to try to educate themselves about economics. You are completely free to shatter my pride if you can, though. I invite you to, because I'll see it as a call to improve. If I'm wrong, I should know about it.

4. My attitude is more confident than obnoxious, but I never said I wouldn't be a little obnoxious. People here have a tendency to take my arguments personally for some reason. I have not, however, seen an actual refutation of what I said about the RSA vids in OP. I've just seen people get angry about my apparent arrogance. The only way to make me look and feel stupid would be to actually prove me wrong, rather than get angry about the way I deliver. You want me to act like I am not sure of myself! Further, I never said people can't lash out at me if they think I'm obnoxious. Go right ahead. And I'll come right back at you with all I've got.

5. I didn't make a type-o when I said "personal attacks don't become you." You seem to think I did. But I guess to be consistent with my last point, I'll do the same kind of thing you've done in this thread and the "basic guidelines" thread (this is going to feel really weird): lobstrich, you are a foolish douchebag. I pity you for your stupidity. I feel sorry for your family, having a member who would argue so vehemently against simple and basic guidelines for social success, such as "keep your nails trimmed." See what I mean? I don't think that kind of statement becomes me at all. If you'll go back and notice, I always explain myself and never just barf out a bunch of unsupported insults.

6. Irony of the decade: you just professed to believe that since I am a teacher, I should not be so critical of people who can't use the English language. What kind of teacher do you envision? A teacher who would accept and admire slop so as not to make students feel dumb? How substandard! Not only do I have the right to judge people for their poor spelling, it is also my job. How cool is that? I am actually paid to judge people's academic performance! Judgment is half the basis of the student teacher relationship; the expert's duty is to evaluate the performance of the trainee and give feedback. Having a soft teacher is a rip-off. You'll get feedback that doesn't hurt your feelings, but you'll also have an inflated picture of your performance. Again, you can thank me via PM when you realize that this is what I've done for you.

I am not even going to bother with you anymore but my end reply will be this: You're an ignorant, obnoxious, idiot. You need to quit the pompous know-it-all attitude and let people do what they want. You are not perfect. Neither are we. So stop forcing your beliefs onto us. You are probably one of the most narrow-minded people I have ever 'met' in my 'entire' fucking life. You so strongly insist that vocabulary and grammar is a sign of intelligence. Then I think you need to smarten up. As far as I'm aware, your mother tongue is English. Yet I think you spell like a tool. So you must be unintelligent. And what if a person is just not very lingual? But instead very Mathematical? Then he/she is still unintelligent. Because he can't spell for shit. What if English is a second language? Can't spell.. Must be unintelligent.

Go force you opinions and beliefs onto your fucking students or something. They'd probably like it, seeing that you're Mr. Popular in "real life"



Fuck..
 

Hadoblado

think again losers
Local time
Tomorrow 2:01 AM
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
7,065
---
Ummm... would it be possible to move the Zago fanclub to a new thread? It's okay to disagree (frequently), but it seems every time Zago opens his mouth threads are torn asunder. Honestly Zago's popularity warrants a thread all in itself.

From what I can see, it looks like Zago you are XXXJ. You claim to have once been INTP, but the manner in which you speak is either an internet persona, or the manner of someone who judges.
I'm not poking fun of you, it just seems pretty obvious to me that you have very strong opinions which you are extremely confident in, which is something that pretty much defines a judger.

"My last girlfriend used poor spelling and grammar when chatting online with me. It distracted from the meaning she way trying to convey and stuck out like a sore thumb. I found it unattractive. You may say, "that is so callous." I don't choose how I feel about things. If I find something distasteful, that's because it is distasteful. I don't need to ask myself whether I'm being nice or not. Guess what: people are judging you--everyone, all the time. It is impossible not to. So you better put your best foot forward, because you aren't getting around this one."

1) - this shows your confidence in your judgements
2) - not everyone is judging. Just the judgers.
3) - you are in a forum full of perceivers.

I don't have any issue with you, but the way you communicate does stand out. Every time you contribute you are constantly attacked for the way you communicate. You could blame this on
1 - random intolerance or
2 - your methods of communication
Since you value the clarity of one's communication so much, surely you can see that the way in which you communicate your ideas is adversely affecting the clarity of your statements (at least in this forum). The nature of the members here is one where every detail is disassembled, organised categorically and then reassembled, then you come in here with your 'broad strokes' and 'confidence' and turn our worlds upside down. A fundamental difference I perceive between our thought patterns is that you are confident enough to presume yourself correct until someone prove you wrong, where as I (and I'll generalise to all/most INTPs here) work under what I consider the best hypothesis, but don't give force to these beliefs. "If experts in the top of their fields can disagree, who am I but to have one opinion among many?" - is a rough example of the type of self-doubt I'm talking about. If you're going to hold beliefs you read in a book until someone handily disproves them for you, will you become a Christian by reading the bible? What happens if you then read the Qu'ran?
Again, I'm not having a go or anything, I'm just attempting to illustrate my point.

Erm, so uh, back on track. I think you're an xxxJ, and while all are welcome to the forum, the way in which you present yourself is disadvantaging you. This is not some exclusive club or anything, but if you are, for example in INTJ, then surely you would either prefer to be some place where your manner is more accepted (some INTJ forum) OR adjust your manner to be more fitting of the ones you would be defending your manner against in order to talk to/with (INTP forum). This is not an invitation to leave, but merely an observation of a perceived problem and some solutions to it. I personally value your ideas and drive (something many people at this forum lack, including myself), but am not a fan of the form these wonderful things are materialised in.

I liked the OP vod, but found it too scatterbrained and fleeting to be able to concentrate on anything they were really trying to convey.

"What, are you gonna force me to, you raving socialist? Are you gonna try to "redistribute" my wealth?" I laughed really hard at this.
 

zago

Banned
Local time
Today 11:31 AM
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
121
---
I am not even going to bother with you anymore but my end reply will be this:

Good. I will gladly take the last word.

You're an ignorant, obnoxious, idiot. You need to quit the pompous know-it-all attitude and let people do what they want. You are not perfect. Neither are we. So stop forcing your beliefs onto us. You are probably one of the most narrow-minded people I have ever 'met' in my 'entire' fucking life.

Sheesh! So have you really only come to this thread to chastise me for my behavior? You have not made a single point about the topic; you have made this into a thread all about me and your problems with me. You claim that I am forcing you to do something other than what you want, but I'm clearly not. You chose to come to this thread. You chose to read my posts. I am not holding a gun to your head--you are free to believe whatever you want, and I am not forcing my beliefs on you. You're like the figurative animal at the zoo who screams and moans about the horrible conditions of captivity even though the cage door is open.

You so strongly insist that vocabulary and grammar is a sign of intelligence. Then I think you need to smarten up. As far as I'm aware, your mother tongue is English. Yet I think you spell like a tool. So you must be unintelligent. And what if a person is just not very lingual? But instead very Mathematical? Then he/she is still unintelligent. Because he can't spell for shit. What if English is a second language? Can't spell.. Must be unintelligent.
*Vocabulary and grammar are definitely a sign of intelligence. This is not up for debate.
*You think I spell like a tool? I made one type-o in my previous post, which is acceptable by my own standards ("I'm willing to cut people slack considering this informal setting"), and it is better than your record, which I have not criticized so far. I don't think I was out of line for criticizing someone's misspelling 2 of the 11 words he wrote to me.
*I know many people who speak English as a second language, and speak better than boondock did in the above post. So, even if English is his/her second language, my opinion holds.
*If a person is not very lingual, they shouldn't be engaging in written debate. If I suck at math, I'm not about to pick fights with mathematicians. And if I did, I hope they'd treat me the same as any normal person.
*I would LOVE to see boondock confirm your little "what if" scenario of not being very lingual. "AUO BASTERT, I HAEV A LANGWAJ DE-FISHINSEA!" I would totally apologize.

Go force you opinions and beliefs onto your fucking students or something. They'd probably like it, seeing that you're Mr. Popular in "real life"
I don't think you should have put "real life" in quotes. This forum is a dim comparison to real face-to-face interaction. It is bad form that you continue to jab into my personal life, which you know nothing about. You should be addressing me within the context of this forum, which is the only way you know me.
 

Hadoblado

think again losers
Local time
Tomorrow 2:01 AM
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
7,065
---
"Vocabulary and grammar are definitely a sign of intelligence. This is not up for debate."

While you are absolutely correct in this assertion, they ARE a sign of intelligence.

However:
P1 - Vocabulary and grammar are definitely a sign of intelligence
P2 - BoondockSaint has not displayed adherence to the proper code of vocabulary and grammar
C - BoondockSaint is not intelligent.

This shit's not valid. Everyone who displays good grammar and vocabulary are to some degree intelligent (with the exception of some cases, such as parrots or echolalia, but let's just go with this) but it does not follow that everyone who is to some degree intelligent has good grammar and vocabulary. There are thousands if not millions of intelligent dyslexics. If I were to glean all I could from Boondock's post, I'd say she was probably less than inspired to do her best under what you have already stated is an informal setting. Do you really think she couldn't spell 'you' or 'obvious'? I think maybe she was in a hurry to complete a short post and didn't spell check. You're not being charitable in your interpretation, but I don't blame you given the perceived slight on the difficulty of you lifewhat?>>>>
 

zago

Banned
Local time
Today 11:31 AM
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
121
---
Ummm... would it be possible to move the Zago fanclub to a new thread? It's okay to disagree (frequently), but it seems every time Zago opens his mouth threads are torn asunder. Honestly Zago's popularity warrants a thread all in itself.

In all fairness, the only other thread in which that has happened is the social guidelines one that I myself created.

From what I can see, it looks like Zago you are XXXJ. You claim to have once been INTP, but the manner in which you speak is either an internet persona, or the manner of someone who judges.
I'm not poking fun of you, it just seems pretty obvious to me that you have very strong opinions which you are extremely confident in, which is something that pretty much defines a judger.

"My last girlfriend used poor spelling and grammar when chatting online with me. It distracted from the meaning she way trying to convey and stuck out like a sore thumb. I found it unattractive. You may say, "that is so callous." I don't choose how I feel about things. If I find something distasteful, that's because it is distasteful. I don't need to ask myself whether I'm being nice or not. Guess what: people are judging you--everyone, all the time. It is impossible not to. So you better put your best foot forward, because you aren't getting around this one."

1) - this shows your confidence in your judgements
2) - not everyone is judging. Just the judgers.
3) - you are in a forum full of perceivers.

I used to be much more profoundly INTP than I am now. From about 21-25, I constantly agonized over my beliefs, questioning every assumption down to the very most basic. Is murder wrong? How do I know? By whose standard? That kind of thing. I was as lost as lost can be. It was to the point that I couldn't stand being alone with my thoughts, because I would always just wind up taking everything apart to the point where I could conclude nothing, and yet the thoughts and judgments kept coming. When I was 22 or 23, I began actively trying to stop thinking. I remember the exact day and place where I decided to just ignore all my thoughts and concentrate on mental silence. I spent a year or two doing this to varying degrees of obsession.

What began to clear things up for me was my interest in Zen Buddhism, my job teaching at a tough school, and an older and wiser friend who has been like a mentor to me. Especially the last 2. The Zen is like a thought-puzzle that I now understand. I always had the wrong idea about it, and it tormented me and drove me to try to understand. At my job, it took a couple years, but I found out what a sucker I was. Kids make excuses, try to pull stunts, etc. I can smell BS a mile away now. Last, I have always had friends who were about like I was, and usually not as smart. Now that I'm out of college, this is not the case any more. The social guidelines I posted? I got those all from a friend I admire. Before I met this person, I thought the same thing as all the people I now argue with here.

So, now I don't try to stop my thoughts any more. You can't really stop them anyway, but I at least see their validity. I didn't used to. After a long period of reflection and agonizing over my thoughts, I've come to see the reasons behind them and the way they all fit together. No, I don't know it all yet, but I've improved vastly and I'm getting closer all the time.

You've got to ask yourself: where does all this debate, both internal and external, lead? If you aren't getting somewhere with your thoughts and are stuck on uncertainty, it's time to start agonizing a little harder. INTPs may question themselves highly, and that's a good thing, but this doesn't mean it won't lead anywhere. Yes, a higher level of certainty is possible, and it improves life a great deal.

I don't have any issue with you, but the way you communicate does stand out. Every time you contribute you are constantly attacked for the way you communicate. You could blame this on
1 - random intolerance or
2 - your methods of communication
Since you value the clarity of one's communication so much, surely you can see that the way in which you communicate your ideas is adversely affecting the clarity of your statements (at least in this forum). The nature of the members here is one where every detail is disassembled, organised categorically and then reassembled, then you come in here with your 'broad strokes' and 'confidence' and turn our worlds upside down.

Maybe that's just what this place needs. I don't expect anyone to agree with me right away. If there's anything I know for sure, it's that change takes a long time. If you were all the sort of people that could just drop your beliefs immediately, I'd have no respect for you. I have no problem with people challenging me. If you're going to adopt new beliefs, you should at least put them to the test first.

A fundamental difference I perceive between our thought patterns is that you are confident enough to presume yourself correct until someone prove you wrong, where as I (and I'll generalise to all/most INTPs here) work under what I consider the best hypothesis, but don't give force to these beliefs. "If experts in the top of their fields can disagree, who am I but to have one opinion among many?" - is a rough example of the type of self-doubt I'm talking about. If you're going to hold beliefs you read in a book until someone handily disproves them for you, will you become a Christian by reading the bible? What happens if you then read the Qu'ran?

When you find the right information, you know it. It makes sense, and it makes you feel validated. When I began reading Intellectuals and Society, for example, I knew it was right because these were thoughts on the tip of my mind that I could never had the words to express. Everything made sense to me in an "oh, that's so obvious" kind of way. That's not how I always feel when I read books, though. To me it really depends on finding the right path. Until I knew what to look for, everything I found just confused me. Now that I have a better idea of what is right and wrong, I find it easier to select what is right. If I had seen OP's vids a couple years ago, I wouldn't have known what to make of them. I would have kept an open mind about them and tried using their belief system for a while, until I concluded it to be unsatisfactory, which could have been months. That's why it makes me so angry now that I know better.

Erm, so uh, back on track. I think you're an xxxJ, and while all are welcome to the forum, the way in which you present yourself is disadvantaging you. This is not some exclusive club or anything, but if you are, for example in INTJ, then surely you would either prefer to be some place where your manner is more accepted (some INTJ forum) OR adjust your manner to be more fitting of the ones you would be defending your manner against in order to talk to/with (INTP forum). This is not an invitation to leave, but merely an observation of a perceived problem and some solutions to it. I personally value your ideas and drive (something many people at this forum lack, including myself), but am not a fan of the form these wonderful things are materialised in.

You have a point. I realize it too, which is why I only take this kind of place in small doses. I used to post frequently at INTPc, but as I grew and began to see it for what it is, I got into more and more of this sort of argument and finally quit the place. Every once in a while, though, I do forget what it is like to get in a heated debate, and poke my head in here and state my mind. The rest takes care of itself.

I liked the OP vod, but found it too scatterbrained and fleeting to be able to concentrate on anything they were really trying to convey.

It is definitely scatterbrained and fleeting. They do anything but present a cohesive case. To the confused, uninformed, or unacquainted, it may seem impressive. They throw around a lot of big ideas, speak with a tone of authority, advocate high ideals, and have hip dry-erase board illustrations. It's a crisp product, but has no validity or practicality to speak of.
 

zago

Banned
Local time
Today 11:31 AM
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
121
---
"Vocabulary and grammar are definitely a sign of intelligence. This is not up for debate."

While you are absolutely correct in this assertion, they ARE a sign of intelligence.

However:
P1 - Vocabulary and grammar are definitely a sign of intelligence
P2 - BoondockSaint has not displayed adherence to the proper code of vocabulary and grammar
C - BoondockSaint is not intelligent.

This shit's not valid. Everyone who displays good grammar and vocabulary are to some degree intelligent (with the exception of some cases, such as parrots or echolalia, but let's just go with this) but it does not follow that everyone who is to some degree intelligent has good grammar and vocabulary. There are thousands if not millions of intelligent dyslexics. If I were to glean all I could from Boondock's post, I'd say she was probably less than inspired to do her best under what you have already stated is an informal setting. Do you really think she couldn't spell 'you' or 'obvious'? I think maybe she was in a hurry to complete a short post and didn't spell check. You're not being charitable in your interpretation, but I don't blame you given the perceived slight on the difficulty of you lifewhat?>>>>

Then just set up a different syllogism:

P1 - Poor vocabulary and grammar are a sign of poor intelligence
P2 - BoondockSaint has not displayed adherence to the proper code of vocabulary and grammar
C - BoondockSaint has poor intelligence

There is no need to split hairs, though. Her post was incredibly sloppy (both grammatically and argumentatively) and I had every right to nail her for it.
 

Hadoblado

think again losers
Local time
Tomorrow 2:01 AM
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
7,065
---
Haha I would direct you to my grammar nazi thread. I disagree with you on the grammar thing with every fiber of my being. I am absolutely certain that your certainty in your measure of stupidity is unfounded. I'm big on the Socrates, so when I hear myself thinking "the only thing certain is uncertainty" I sorta get a kick.

In my books anyone who can demonstrate their intelligence is smart. People who have demonstrated their intelligence to me include Albert Einstein, Charles Darwin, Henry Ford, Galileo Galilei and Issac Newton among many others.

Could you doubt the intelligence of these men? They are clearly the epitome of intellectual achievement. And yet by your standard these men have poor intelligence? We don't have a single 'intelligence' that is equally good at everything, we have an incredibly complex system which is interconnected and shit. I don't need to explain to you how complex a brain is, I don't even want to because explaining it is difficult. Making BBRRRROOOAAADDD stroke assumptions like 'brain does language bad, therefore brain does everything bad' is moronic but at the same time seems to be crucial to your belief that poor grammar is the equivalent of poor intelligence. I have myself witnessed Boondock being not stupid on several occasions, to accept your understanding of things I would be required to disregard these occasions and focus on this one event where there are so many possibilities other than 'Boondock is stupid' it blows my mind. I hope you didn't receive your understanding of grammar's link to intelligence from a book while having your (somewhat Cartesian) clear and distinct perception which has granted you so much confidence? Might I remind you where that got Descartes after he tried to branch out from the cogito?

Splitting hairs is exactly what we do here to be entirely clear. When someone is called stupid, everyone will come to their own conclusions on whether that person is stupid or not. Don't think that doesn't apply both ways. When a claim was made that you'd never experienced a hard day in your life I dismissed it (almost) immediately (I reread your post for clarification:phear:).

As to your claim to have every right to nail her (double entendres aside ;)), that right is completely self ordained. If you ask Boondocks about your right she'll probably say you're an arsehole. I would again advise you to read the grammar Nazi thread, as headway was made in mine and other's perception(s), at the very least I might consider it for your list of things to aid in social success. :D

Well I've had enough debate for today, I think I may go and watch some Mad Men :) Btw I'm the chronological yin to your yang, being an exINTJ who has been pulled over to the dark side of lazy. Well... depending on how old you are I guess... the graph might be interesting... pffft just a thought:smoker:
 

Hadoblado

think again losers
Local time
Tomorrow 2:01 AM
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
7,065
---
Wow do I use that many smiley faces? ...Bitches love them smiley faces...
:smiley_emoticons_mr
 

zago

Banned
Local time
Today 11:31 AM
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
121
---
FYI: when you call someone stupid you don't always have to prove your case as if it were the trial of the century. When someone cuts me off on the street, I call him a fucking idiot. Then it's over! I don't go through it all in my mind figuring out ways to logically prove they are idiotic, looking for historical examples, and asking myself how they would feel about it. Ever head of something called "overthinking things"? I called her stupid, big deal, she deserved it, the end. Look at what you are arguing about.
 

Hadoblado

think again losers
Local time
Tomorrow 2:01 AM
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
7,065
---
I can hear a million split second judgments in any other part of my life, most of which I don't have the satisfaction of correcting. I come here to read people's thought who are prone to over thinking, it's like a jungle gym or something. The worst crime in my eyes is convincing others of your wrong opinion, without this phenomenon there are only isolated incidents of deviance, with it there are recurring deviance systems (I'll point my finger at all but the true religion here, whichever one that may be).
I don't like letting shit fly, I have to do it to remain a functioning member of society on any level. Here I don't feel the compulsion to hold any back. I'll quit when I'm ignored or people admit their grand designs aren't fool proof.
You and I see eye to eye, but only the shadow of a reflection in a warped mirror of an eye that is only implied by lighting.

FYI: when I say something I mean it, and can probably back it up with evidence. If I can't I'll likely communicate this as I say it. Yelling out hateful unjustified slurs produces nothing worth while, I consider it beneath me and think it likely to be beneath most people if they stopped to think about it. Thought is a wonderful thing which you have purposefully altered in yourself for better or for worse. I may admire some outcomes you have achieved through your self-mod, it must be nice getting things done because you want them so, but the only tool for understanding this universe is thought, and I'll be thrice damned before I make the conscious decision to stop using it without a better alternative.
 

TheAndroid

Redshirt
Local time
Tomorrow 3:31 AM
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
16
---
LOL zago
Rather then admit your wrong, you dismiss the entire argument saying that it trivial?
You say Hadoblado is over thinking things, but you are the one having a bitch (for lack of a better word) about two wrong letters.

And i will also point out that your last post is contradictory of when you wrote something along the lines of 'I don't just throw insults at people unless I know that i am right!' (I'm too lazy to get the actual quote) Doesn't that imply that you do look for ways to logically prove the basis for your insults?

Anyway, I too, am obviously taking an opposed position to your opinions, kind of.
Firstly, as Hadoblado described, I think that correct grammar and spelling CAN be a sign of the intelligence of an individual, however there are many other 'variables' that can influence the correctness of that individuals grammar/spelling. One point that I would like to bring up, which has been proven by this thread and which proves your wrongness, is that a person simply may not care whether his spelling/grammar is concise. If this were true the persons spelling/grammar would not be a true indicator of their intelligence.

On a different note, you may be pleased that I am planning to read 'basic economics' as i generally favour Left wing. I realise that it is at most half-baked and am eager to learn more about economics and government(Why don't they teach this in school?). Do you have any suggestions for an unbiased (or as much possible) book on the matter?

I find your intelligence level highly respectable, but somehow limited by your judgement.
 

TheAndroid

Redshirt
Local time
Tomorrow 3:31 AM
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
16
---
Disregard my second paragraph, didn't think that one through..
:o
 

Hadoblado

think again losers
Local time
Tomorrow 2:01 AM
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
7,065
---
I'll read the damn book too just so I don't feel left behind!

I'm a lefty too, so eager to be taught am I.
 

Dr. Freeman

In a place outside of time
Local time
Today 11:31 AM
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Messages
725
---
1...2...3...4 I declare a flame war.
 

Dr. Freeman

In a place outside of time
Local time
Today 11:31 AM
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Messages
725
---
I was referring to the past dialogue. If I could, I would post this between post #6 and post #7, but I was not present at that time. I have no desire to participate in a flame war.

Also, even though I am fairly conservative, I am not willing to reject any possible solution without careful and meticulous consideration.
 

zago

Banned
Local time
Today 11:31 AM
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
121
---
I can hear a million split second judgments in any other part of my life, most of which I don't have the satisfaction of correcting. I come here to read people's thought who are prone to over thinking, it's like a jungle gym or something. The worst crime in my eyes is convincing others of your wrong opinion, without this phenomenon there are only isolated incidents of deviance, with it there are recurring deviance systems (I'll point my finger at all but the true religion here, whichever one that may be).
I don't like letting shit fly, I have to do it to remain a functioning member of society on any level. Here I don't feel the compulsion to hold any back. I'll quit when I'm ignored or people admit their grand designs aren't fool proof.
You and I see eye to eye, but only the shadow of a reflection in a warped mirror of an eye that is only implied by lighting.

That's fine, but most of us don't live in whatever universe you do. And by "us" I'm not just talking about this forum.

FYI: when I say something I mean it, and can probably back it up with evidence. If I can't I'll likely communicate this as I say it. Yelling out hateful unjustified slurs produces nothing worth while, I consider it beneath me and think it likely to be beneath most people if they stopped to think about it. Thought is a wonderful thing which you have purposefully altered in yourself for better or for worse. I may admire some outcomes you have achieved through your self-mod, it must be nice getting things done because you want them so, but the only tool for understanding this universe is thought, and I'll be thrice damned before I make the conscious decision to stop using it without a better alternative.
That's fine, because all my hate has been well-justified.

LOL zago
Rather then admit your wrong, you dismiss the entire argument saying that it trivial?
You say Hadoblado is over thinking things, but you are the one having a bitch (for lack of a better word) about two wrong letters.

Did you riddle this paragraph with errors purposely to prove your point?

On a different note, you may be pleased that I am planning to read 'basic economics' as i generally favour Left wing. I realise that it is at most half-baked and am eager to learn more about economics and government(Why don't they teach this in school?). Do you have any suggestions for an unbiased (or as much possible) book on the matter?
I'll read the damn book too just so I don't feel left behind!

I'm a lefty too, so eager to be taught am I.

Ah, that's great! You won't be disappointed. Thomas Sowell is a great author. Let me warn you, though, that Basic Economics is long, but its concepts aren't difficult and it is very readable and logical. If you want a good precursor, read Intellectuals and Society first. In the latter, he covers a lot of the same points about economics and it is really just as belief-shattering (but more concentrated). Please let me know what you think.

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell1.asp

^^that's his weekly column, archived. Have fun.
 

zago

Banned
Local time
Today 11:31 AM
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
121
---
PS, here's a youtube channel containing many videos by Sowell. For starters, I'd also recommend Milton Friedman's videos. http://www.youtube.com/user/LibertyPen

Trust me, you'll find that they make a LOT more sense than the ones in the OP. Enjoy. Hope this reaches someone.
 

TheAndroid

Redshirt
Local time
Tomorrow 3:31 AM
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
16
---
Did you riddle this paragraph with errors purposely to prove your point?

I'll take that as a stab at my intelligence level, but I'll let it slide this time because I deserved such a response for not double checking myself (especially considering the topic of discussion).

Ah, that's great! You won't be disappointed. Thomas Sowell is a great author. Let me warn you, though, that Basic Economics is long, but its concepts aren't difficult and it is very readable and logical. If you want a good precursor, read Intellectuals and Society first. In the latter, he covers a lot of the same points about economics and it is really just as belief-shattering (but more concentrated). Please let me know what you think.

Thanks for the suggestions, I'll definitely let you know my opinion when I finish reading.
 

Linsejko

Ghost of עמק רפאים.
Local time
Today 10:31 AM
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
603
---
Location
In the center of the world. (As opposed to the ear
"...this does not mean repudiating the rights of the individual."

How the hell are you taking this as leftist economics? This is psychology, not economics. Too bad I left the forum on hiatus before the responses here... What an idiot. I learn closer to anarchy than psychology...

The video about how to foster social empathy is basically, how to we keep people from being naturally selfish?

Why? Because we're fucking destroying the planet. This has nothing to do with taking people's money and re-distributing wealth. I am a fiscal libertarian and disapprove of large government myself. However, the human race is doomed if some social engineering doesn't take place...

Above all things, this is philosophy--it's deeper than philosophy, if possible. It's about social paradigm. It's the thought of the next step beyond the worldviews that have lead human society to its current state. It's the questions presented in the beginning of the video: what's working, what isn't, and what are we going to do about it?

Anyways, I doubt zago will be responding anytime soon... A small price to pay for the convenience of having him banned.

:rip:
 
Top Bottom