How would a population decline create a crisis?once the crisis reaches its breaking point
I don't give dick cheese about economy to be honest.Having children used to be a necessity, prior to the modern banking system people prepared for retirement by having as large a family as possible, in a sense your family was your business and having an easy retirement was your reward for managing it well.
The modern banking system prioritises assets and investments, to this end having children is not only irrelevant, it’s actively counter-productive, children have gone from being an economic asset to being expensive pets. By owning assets and investments you essentially get other people’s children to support you in your retirement, and they don’t get a choice in this, not if they want a job to work for and a house to live in.
Consequently most every developed nation has a falling birthrate as not only are people disincentivised from having children, as the population shrinks the economic burden of the elderly is amplified, encouraging people to double down on acquiring assets and investments, and avoid having children.
Until now the governments of these nations have been using immigration to restock the population, but these immigrants are often middle-aged or older and they also want to prepare for their own retirement by buying assets and investments, this fuels speculation and inflation.
It’s like drinking seawater when you’re dying of thirst.
The tax system needs to be changed to incentivise having children and disincentivise speculation on essential assets like housing, this can happen peacefully now or at the end of a bloody conservative revolution once the crisis reaches its breaking point.
The videos made clear points. Its a good choice to not have kids.then feel free to make that point. But know that you wouldn't have been born if your point was taken seriously by your parents.
So to value the programming? Are we programmed to value our programming?Nobody has kids because they have an "idea". They have kids because it's what they're programmed to do. It just happens. And only when you have them do you start to value the gift you've been given.
Sounds like a way to pit one generation against an other. The system adapting, reinforcing itself.
Yes. According to the selfish gene theory we are all programmed to like our own programming over that of others.So to value the programming? Are we programmed to value our programming?Nobody has kids because they have an "idea". They have kids because it's what they're programmed to do. It just happens. And only when you have them do you start to value the gift you've been given.
Yes. According to the selfish gene theory we are all programmed to like our own programming over that of others.So to value the programming? Are we programmed to value our programming?Nobody has kids because they have an "idea". They have kids because it's what they're programmed to do. It just happens. And only when you have them do you start to value the gift you've been given.
And so to sustain selfhood, suspicious cellular segments circulate seductively.Yes. According to the selfish gene theory we are all programmed to like our own programming over that of others.So to value the programming? Are we programmed to value our programming?Nobody has kids because they have an "idea". They have kids because it's what they're programmed to do. It just happens. And only when you have them do you start to value the gift you've been given.
Yes. According to the selfish gene theory we are all programmed to like our own programming over that of others.So to value the programming? Are we programmed to value our programming?Nobody has kids because they have an "idea". They have kids because it's what they're programmed to do. It just happens. And only when you have them do you start to value the gift you've been given.
Not having kids has vastly more advantages imho.i personally don't get it. At the very least will postpone it as much as possible