fluffy
Blake Belladonna
- Local time
- Today 2:22 PM
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2024
- Messages
- 563
I don't think intelligence is all about IQ tests.
But I do think intelligence can be based on the 1 in x relationship to solving problems.
So if I am better than 99% of people at solving problems I am 1 in 100 and so on for other problems.
Specifying what a problem is I cannot tell you but I have an analog.
People can remember 7 things at once on average being 100 IQ and this increases or decrease 1 item every 5 IQ points.
As example 145 can remember 16 things at the same time. What is important to know is that if a problem has 16 objects to be considered at the same time then they have an interrelationship of 256 when you must compare them all together at the same time.
This is only an example of what might be required. Other things are important to like what you can pay attention to at the same time but let think of this as happing in ones head.
You imagine 16 variables as 256 relationships and use this to create your ideas applied to the real world.
1 in 400 people would be able to do this.
Now let's say you as a person would like to think like this, what could you do?
You would need to expand your awareness.
Not by practicing puzzles as this only makes you good at that particular puzzle.
Instead you may have to shift focus.
To many people set themselves up to learn in unhealthy ways that diminishes parallel processing.
The best athlete's train with elite trainers, I believe the brain can be made more intelligent by a wider perspective shifting. The Flynn effect shows this. Because of special attention kids and adults can increase a perceptual range. This is what situational awareness is. And like the body can atrophy or become an Olympic athlete. The right Food water, special attention, so can perception. It is basically inter hemisphere synchronization to become autodidactic.
Stable Intelligence is a misnomer of aggregated data sets I believe of people doing normal life activities. Not enhanced activities.
The norms of population under enhanced activities would raise the average up considerably.
The 1 in x measure then would become almost useless. A normal curve would not exist anymore, it would shift right abnormally and be asymmetric to the other side.
I don't mean to say this will happen but that it is possible. Atrophy of awareness is a real problem that people face in cognition. Holding people back is not knowing how to pay attention that create synergistic effects. Like the poverty trap (I am poor because I am hungry, I am hungry because I am poor) type of thing.
It makes sense that first a person needs cognitive reflection as to emotional stability and health stability. Then further awareness training. The person who created the flow genome institute looks at ways to do this. He had depression and worked through it but by trial and error. More advanced techniques exist. The brain doesn't have to be an unresponsive blob of Jell-O. More so like a fighter pilot.
But I do think intelligence can be based on the 1 in x relationship to solving problems.
So if I am better than 99% of people at solving problems I am 1 in 100 and so on for other problems.
Specifying what a problem is I cannot tell you but I have an analog.
People can remember 7 things at once on average being 100 IQ and this increases or decrease 1 item every 5 IQ points.
As example 145 can remember 16 things at the same time. What is important to know is that if a problem has 16 objects to be considered at the same time then they have an interrelationship of 256 when you must compare them all together at the same time.
This is only an example of what might be required. Other things are important to like what you can pay attention to at the same time but let think of this as happing in ones head.
You imagine 16 variables as 256 relationships and use this to create your ideas applied to the real world.
1 in 400 people would be able to do this.
Now let's say you as a person would like to think like this, what could you do?
You would need to expand your awareness.
Not by practicing puzzles as this only makes you good at that particular puzzle.
Instead you may have to shift focus.
To many people set themselves up to learn in unhealthy ways that diminishes parallel processing.
The best athlete's train with elite trainers, I believe the brain can be made more intelligent by a wider perspective shifting. The Flynn effect shows this. Because of special attention kids and adults can increase a perceptual range. This is what situational awareness is. And like the body can atrophy or become an Olympic athlete. The right Food water, special attention, so can perception. It is basically inter hemisphere synchronization to become autodidactic.
Stable Intelligence is a misnomer of aggregated data sets I believe of people doing normal life activities. Not enhanced activities.
The norms of population under enhanced activities would raise the average up considerably.
The 1 in x measure then would become almost useless. A normal curve would not exist anymore, it would shift right abnormally and be asymmetric to the other side.
I don't mean to say this will happen but that it is possible. Atrophy of awareness is a real problem that people face in cognition. Holding people back is not knowing how to pay attention that create synergistic effects. Like the poverty trap (I am poor because I am hungry, I am hungry because I am poor) type of thing.
It makes sense that first a person needs cognitive reflection as to emotional stability and health stability. Then further awareness training. The person who created the flow genome institute looks at ways to do this. He had depression and worked through it but by trial and error. More advanced techniques exist. The brain doesn't have to be an unresponsive blob of Jell-O. More so like a fighter pilot.