Derail from MBTI fud takedown

[Miss spelt]

Two classes with a supported biological basis, not a theorized one.

(well that is actually gender. Sexuality has more classes and is more sociologically debatable)

Oh please, don't be silly.

 

[Miss spelt]

Re: MBTI FUD takedown thread

You're conflating an obvious truth (there are two sexes) with the biological theory of sexual dimorphism.

(Good rebuttal to my rebuttal, and yes I'm talking about gender, not sexual preference.)

None of that is true.

 

[Fukyo]

Re: MBTI FUD takedown thread

Oh please, don't be silly.

None of that is true.

mod notice-

These flippant statements don't add much to discussion besides their inflammatory potential. You just started posting and are already bombing threads and showing unnecessary animosity . This thread has a specific purpose, which is not discussion of matters of gender and sexuality, and even if it were this kind of response would still be inappropriate. Be a little more articulate with your disagreements and don't continue to derail threads. If you want to respond to this you can message me.

 

[Miss spelt]

Re: MBTI FUD takedown thread

Actually Jennywocky my posts have already been flagged as inflammatory, pointless, unproductive, and silly. Please refrain from responding.

 

[Jennywocky]

Re: MBTI FUD takedown thread

...but I like silly.

 

[Sinny91]

Re: MBTI FUD takedown thread

Actually Jennywocky my posts have already been flagged as inflammatory, pointless, unproductive, and silly

And how does that make you feel?
*cocks head forward to study subject past bespectacled glasses*

 

[Miss spelt]

Re: MBTI FUD takedown thread

And how does that make you feel?
*cocks head forward to study subject past bespectacled glasses*

Rejected. I was trying to be on topic and valid.

 

[Minuend]

Re: MBTI FUD takedown thread

Actually Jennywocky my posts have already been flagged as inflammatory, pointless, unproductive, and silly. Please refrain from responding.

Cheekiness is appreciated every now and again, but too much of it can make a topic a bit bland, with one liners back and forth. And there wont be much argument from either side to build a better, more thorough counter-argument. Sometimes a more interesting and complex discussion can evolve from tangents derived from more encompassing argumentation

You do seem to have knowledge in neurology and psychology, so I hope you stick around to post some thoughts. It would be interesting to read.

 

[Architect]

Re: MBTI FUD takedown thread

Cheekiness is appreciated every now and again, but too much of it can make a topic a bit bland, with one liners back and forth.

So far it's derailing threads, this is the second one and its annoying.

You do seem to have knowledge in neurology and psychology, so I hope you stick around to post some thoughts. It would be interesting to read.

Agree as I've said elsewhere, just stop the pot shots and put some understandable meat into the post.

 

[onesteptwostep]

Re: MBTI FUD takedown thread

w00t lady squad saves the day

 

[Sinny91]

Re: MBTI FUD takedown thread

Rejected. I was trying to be on topic and valid.

We're all rejects here.
You'll settle in, in a day or two.

 

[TheManBeyond]

Re: MBTI FUD takedown thread

w00t lady squad saves the day

hahahahha
indeed

 

[Miss spelt]

Re: MBTI FUD takedown thread

K well. Sorry I disagree that human sexuality classes the world population into two categories. I'll pick my battles a little more tactfully.

I guess they say seek first to understand, then to be understood. Obviously I skipped a step. I see now you didn't mean sexuality or biological sex or the entire world population how silly of me.

 

[Ex-User (11125)]

Re: MBTI FUD takedown thread

I guess they say seek first to understand, then to be understood.

exactly. dont take mod-notice the wrong way, you're not rejected and no one here is trying to censor you. its just that everyone here is expected to explain why they disagree with others without belittlement. you don't have to resort to that to make yourself heard here anyway. besides, it gives the impression that you're only involving yourself in discussions because you're looking to establish that you're right...obviously, that would make others reluctant to engage with you. the whole point of discussing things is to cross-pollinate ideas, and that can only happen when there is mutual patience understanding