Confusion

[heromust]

Hello there, I am new here but i joined for one purpose, to find the answer for my question
I am an INTP but there is one thing mismatching me with the INTP, Which is romance
I don't struggle with romance as i was young i used to watch couples and relationships and watch the patterns and learn from experience
I am pretty sensitive toward my partner and don't think of love as a big delusion but a necessity for me to be able to function right and focus toward a much bigger goal,
So i guess not all INTP are alike or i could be wrong which i doubt.

Thanks!

 

[Cognisant]

6/10

 

[AmacdaTNPI]

Honestly I believe most intps have the ability to understand anything they put their mind into when analysis can develop systematic patterns so I think you just found out what you care for most and that's romance and other intps just found something else they care in to tackle but it all depends on the person. I believe If other intps were to care enough about romance or found they do then they would be just as good but the real question is why romance? Maybe you're able to see the cause an effect of people from their emotions and see the big picture on how it effects each other and the economy but it seems to be more of an skill to you than an attached goal you thrive for. Maybe rather fun for you than emotional

 

[JR_IsP]

INTPs are good (A Si-Fe technique) in reading other people feelings and action and remember them for further use in our own relationships, and also Ti-Ne can formulate conduct patterns and theories about them. But love?

Love is irrational. By definition. But that's not bad, at all, I think that the ultimate love declaration of an INTP is to be irrational for love. Now, I'm not married, or in a long-term relationship or something like that, but from my own theories and conduct patterns... I think that love may be able to fill something that logic and theories can't.

That's all I have to say.

 

[AmacdaTNPI]

INTPs are good (A Si-Fe technique) in reading other people feelings and action and remember them for further use in our own relationships, and also Ti-Ne can formulate conduct patterns and theories about them. But love?

Love is irrational. By definition. But that's not bad, at all, I think that the ultimate love declaration of an INTP is to be irrational for love. Now, I'm not married, or in a long-term relationship or something like that, but from my own theories and conduct patterns... I think that love may be able to fill something that logic and theories can't.

That's all I have to say.

You're right that love can fill something that theories can't and if you think about it, every thought is a chemical reactions so in order to make the system flow correctly, certain emotions have to be evicted in order to think clearly and those emotions can be unstable that's why intps have to have the emotional outburst cause every person needs to experience emotions so if a person has more developed emotions it physically feels more elegant to think and it keeps the system going so hero probably knows that love makes it easier to think is vented out correctly and probably mentally relaxes all the time from it

 

[TAC]

Love is the 5th dimension, duh.
Didn't you losers watch interstellar

 

[JR_IsP]

Love is the 5th dimension, duh.
Didn't you losers watch interstellar

Eh, no. No dude. Love isn't 5th dimension. In the movie they define love as a force that is able to travel across dimensions, not as a dimension itself.

 

[AmacdaTNPI]

Love is the 5th dimension, duh.
Didn't you losers watch interstellar

Lol
Love can send messages across time intervals of course

 

[AmacdaTNPI]

Eh, no. No dude. Love isn't 5th dimension. In the movie they define love as a force that is able to travel across dimensions, not as a dimension itself.

It doesn't need to be a dimension to cross dimensions cause the speed of light is faster then everything going on an inertial time frame so that's why it's able to revalue at every dimension at the same speed and the force of gravity so if love is a message sorta like radio waves being sent from phones, it's a message that travels at the speed of light and if love is a message like that it would travel across the speed of light if it's able to travel across dimension and maybe this is actually possible from the electrons setting tune(influence of pull) with the electrons of the others persons brain creating the chemical reactions and quantum entanglement states that polar things will always move if the other polar side moves like compasses so no matter the distance it can have an effect across dimensions if traveled at the speed of light. This might be able to happen if the two people have a certain "lock" from expressing the same chemicals (from emotions) with each other at the same time frequently.

 

[JR_IsP]

Love as a "electron lock"? Maybe. But I think it's more likely to love to be the result of chemical reactions in our brains (releasing hormones and endorphines) than being something outside our head, beacuse if we accept the electron lock theorie, we'd be accepting also the existance of a "soul" or some kind of individual energy outside our bodies. I'm not saying that love must be that, nor the souls doesn't exist, I only think that we're going to need further info and experiments for testing these ideas.

 

[Turnevies]

Guys, love is a good example of something to relieve you of the burden of having to analyze everything and experience that there is more to life. Don't get me wrong, I also have intellectual curiosity for this, both just for the interest as for learning to get better at it myself. But especially if I do it for the second reason, it is always bit of a tradeof, it is some 'apple of knowledge' that removes some naivity and magic from the equation (except that there ought to be no equation for love).

Instead of only the reductionist's view, also learn to appreciate the poet's view.

@heromust MBTI itself is not hard science. If you want to identify with the pieces of INTP you recognize and not with the others, that is fine.

 

[AmacdaTNPI]

Love as a "electron lock"? Maybe. But I think it's more likely to love to be the result of chemical reactions in our brains (releasing hormones and endorphines) than being something outside our head, beacuse if we accept the electron lock theorie, we'd be accepting also the existance of a "soul" or some kind of individual energy outside our bodies. I'm not saying that love must be that, nor the souls doesn't exist, I only think that we're going to need further info and experiments for testing these ideas.

Well I'm not saying that love is controlled be a predecided fate or anything. I'm saying that after the two people decide to love each other "releasing hormones" on their own choice, it is then a created "lock" from the bonds created from the two as reactants. It just so happens with the possibility of it traveling across dimensions that no matter how far the two are, the two will always have an influence of relation afterwords because of the coincidence of the two people releasing the same pheromone/ chemical (oxytocin) at the same time causing a bond between the two through pure chemicals wanting to stay reacted together. But experiments wouldn't be hard by measuring waves in the air from certain thoughts emitted from two people that love each other and two people that don't comparing present waves emitted after certain thoughts which is convenient because chemicals are electrical and electricity waves and matter can al be converted into each other with law of conservation of mass, E=MC^2 and string theory. But since emotions and chemicals are electrical, it can be read through an electrical scanner linking electricity to certain neurotransmitters

 

[JR_IsP]

Maybe. I like how you defined love, it's so... idealistic and pure. Btw, if you'd like to read a thread about the nature of consciousness you can check it here.

 

[PmjPmj]

My best friend is a professionally confirmed INTP, and he's never had any trouble with the ladies.

For what it's worth.