• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Tree or Forest?

EmptyVessel

Banned
Local time
Today 6:04 AM
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
4
---
There is a saying, "Can't tell the forest from the trees." Never mind that. Just what is the difference between the forest and the tree? Does one exist without the other? What light does this shed on the meaning of existence? Can the forest ever be a tree or the tree a forest? What are the implications of this?
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 6:04 AM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
It's not complicated: A "tree" is (potentially) an element of the set called "forest."

The phrase in question just means that you need to step outside of all the distracting details of the individual trees and look at the collection (forest) as a big picture. When you're in the trees, you can get "lost" but when you're stepping outside the trees and looking at it as a forest, the broad shape and essence of the set is more clear -- just like you might not know where you are generally if you're on the planet somewhere but your location and framing is much more obvious when you're looking down from orbit.

(Yeah, maybe you were just Ne-flinging assorted questions around and didn't really have a goal in mind by asking this, but that's my "serious" answer.)
 

JansenDowel

Active Member
Local time
Today 11:04 PM
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
240
---
Location
New Zealand
This appears to be a quote about reductionism. I'm personally not a reductionist. What about you?
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Today 12:04 AM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,155
---
It's a quote about the shortcomings of subjective perception, on the ground all you can see is the trees, in the air you can only see one forest canopy, only by cross referencing the individual subjective perspectives can an objective understanding of the forest as a whole be obtained.

The forest ecology is neither one tree or many individual trees, it's many individual trees that together create the canopy and thus the ecology.
 

mrrhq

Dedicated Debian Dude
Local time
Today 3:04 AM
Joined
May 22, 2014
Messages
59
---
I will put it simply In Zen terms.
A tree is a tree, and a forest is a forest.
Your question has been answered.

In reality, they are two different definitions.
 

OrLevitate

Banned
Local time
Today 3:04 AM
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
784
---
Location
I'm intrinsically luminous, mortals. I'm 4ever
I will put it simply In Zen terms.
A tree is a tree, and a forest is a forest.
Your question has been answered.

In reality, they are two different definitions.

Reading your posts is like opening this spoiler
mind_blown.gif
 
Top Bottom